Cited by 131Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Protein nanocages that penetrate airway mucus and tumor tissue

Open access
Huang, Xinglu, Chisholm, Jane, Zhuang, Jie, Xiao, Yanyu, Duncan, Gregg, Chen, Xiaoyuan, Suk, Jung Soo, Hanes, Justin·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Reports on drug delivery systems capable of overcoming multiple biological barriers are rare. We introduce a nanoparticle-based drug delivery technology capable of rapidly penetrating both lung tumor tissue and the mucus layer that protects airway tissues from nanoscale objects. Specifically, human ferritin heavy-chain nanocages (FTn) were functionalized with polyethylene glycol (PEG) in a unique manner that allows robust control over PEG location (nanoparticle surface only) and surface density. We varied PEG surface density and molecular weight to discover PEGylated FTn that rapidly penetrated both mucus barriers and tumor tissues in vitro and in vivo. Upon inhalation in mice, PEGylated FTn with optimized PEGylation rapidly penetrated the mucus gel layer and thus provided a uniform distribution throughout the airways. Subsequently, PEGylated FTn preferentially penetrated and distributed within orthotopic lung tumor tissue, and selectively entered cancer cells, in a transferrin receptor 1-dependent manner, which is up-regulated in most cancers. To test the potential therapeutic benefits, doxorubicin (DOX) was conjugated to PEGylated FTn via an acid-labile linker to facilitate intracellular release of DOX after cell entry. Inhalation of DOX-loaded PEGylated FTn led to 60% survival, compared with 10% survival in the group that inhaled DOX in solution at the maximally tolerated dose, in a murine model of malignant airway lung cancer. This approach may provide benefits as an adjuvant therapy combined with systemic chemo- or immunotherapy or as a stand-alone therapy for patients with tumors confined to the airways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1705407114

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BLI is used to assess nanodrug efficiency based on endogenic luminescence of tumors to confirm NPs diagnostics or theranostic prospects and to integrate with other imaging modalities.

    “BLI is used to assess nanodrug efficiency based on the endogenic luminescence of tumors to confirm NPs diagnostics or theranostic prospects and to integrate with other imaging modalities [19,134,135,136].”

    From Approaches to Improve EPR-Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis (2023) · cites this paper as [135]

    The Results (page not provided) use bioluminescence imaging to monitor tumor growth and assess the efficacy of drug-loaded nanocages in mice. But Materials and Methods (page not provided) show that the signal came from engineered luciferase-expressing tumor cells after d-luciferin administration, not endogenous tumor luminescence. The paper does not establish the claimed diagnostic or theranostic prospects or integration of BLI with other imaging modalities. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huang, X., Chisholm, J., Zhuang, J., Xiao, Y., Duncan, G., Chen, X., Suk, J. S., & Hanes, J.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-07-24
Volume
114
Issue
32
Pages
E6595-E6602
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2740024147
Cited by
131
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (U54CA151838, R01HL127413, R01HL136617)
  • Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (HANES07XX0, HANES15G0)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
protein nanocages, FTH1, PEGylation, pulmonary drug delivery, transferrin receptor 1, doxorubicin, acid-labile linker, anticancer drug delivery, nanoparticle functionalization
MeSH terms
Animals, Apoferritins, Doxorubicin, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Experimental, Polyethylene Glycols, Respiratory Mucosa, Nanostructures, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review