Cited by 290Neural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Laminar recordings in frontal cortex suggest distinct layers for maintenance and control of working memory

Open access
Bastos, André M., Loonis, Roman, Kornblith, Simon, Lundqvist, Mikael, Miller, Earl K.·2018·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: The anatomy and dynamics of different layers of the cerebral cortex are distinct. Physiological work in the sensory cortex has investigated how different layers process sensory inputs, and how they are engaged during attention tasks. In the frontal and prefrontal cortices, where lamination is present, very few studies have investigated the role of distinct layers for cognition. We studied frontal cortex laminar neuronal activity as monkeys performed working memory tasks. Spiking and gamma-band activity (50–150 Hz) in the superficial layers reflected active maintenance of working memories. Alpha/beta frequencies (4–22 Hz) in the deep layers modulated the gamma activity in the superficial layers. This might serve a control function, allowing information to enter or exit active storage in superficial layers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1710323115

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gamma power/spiking is anticorrelated with alpha/beta (8 to 30 Hz) power, which is higher under conditions of top-down control (e.g., attention and response inhibition).

    “They are anticorrelated with alpha/beta (8 to 30 Hz) power (26–29), which is higher under conditions of top-down control (e.g., attention and response inhibition) (30–34).”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results section (“Alpha/Beta Oscillations in Deep Layers Modulate Superficial Layers”) reports a negative correlation between deep-layer alpha/beta power and superficial gamma power, supporting the anticorrelation attributed to this source. The paper uses a 4–22 Hz alpha/beta band, rather than the stated 8–30 Hz band. The sentence cites other references for the separate claim about attention and response inhibition. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Gamma power is higher in superficial, feedforward, cortical layers, and alpha/beta power is higher in deep, feedback, cortical layers.

    “This is consistent with gamma power being higher in the superficial, feedforward, cortical layers, and alpha/beta power being higher in the deep, feedback, cortical layers (26, 35–40).”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results section, “Gamma Power Peaks in Superficial Layers and Alpha/Beta Peaks in Deep Layers” (page unavailable), directly reports the claimed power distribution. The Discussion links superficial-layer gamma to feedforward transmission in the visual system but says the function of feedforward connections in prefrontal cortex is undefined; our copy does not establish that the recorded deep layers are feedback layers. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Alpha/beta oscillations in deep cortical layers are anticorrelated with superficial-layer gamma associated with spiking carrying sensory inputs.

    “Further, alpha/beta oscillations in deep cortical layers are anticorrelated with superficial-layer gamma associated with spiking carrying sensory inputs (26, 27).”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results section, “Alpha/Beta Oscillations in Deep Layers Modulate Superficial Layers,” reports a negative correlation between deep-layer alpha/beta power and superficial-layer gamma power. The Discussion section, “Delay Activity in Superficial Layers,” links superficial gamma and spiking to stimulus information held in working memory, but does not establish that the spiking carries sensory inputs. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All across cortex, gamma power (>35 Hz)/spiking is higher during bottom-up sensory inputs.

    “A key observation is that, all across cortex, gamma power (>35 Hz)/spiking is higher during bottom-up sensory inputs.”

    From Layer and rhythm specificity for predictive routing (2020) · cites this paper as [26]

    The Results section reports that gamma bursts increased during the working-memory delay relative to baseline, and that gamma power peaked in superficial layers of the sampled frontal areas (page unavailable). Neither finding establishes higher gamma power or spiking during bottom-up sensory input across cortex. Searches for “bottom-up,” “sensory inputs,” and stimulus-onset comparisons found no passage making that claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bastos, A. M., Loonis, R., Kornblith, S., Lundqvist, M., & Miller, E. K.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Earl K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2018-01-16
Volume
115
Issue
5
Pages
1117-1122
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2784079369
Cited by
290
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
17.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • DOD | United States Navy | ONR | Office of Naval Research Global (ONR MURI N00014-16-1-2832)
  • HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH087027)
  • MIT Picower Innovation Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
working memory, frontal cortex, cortical laminar organization, local field potentials, gamma oscillations, alpha and beta oscillations, prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, supplementary motor area, primary motor cortex, neuronal spiking
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Electrodes, Frontal Lobe, Macaca mulatta, Memory, Short-Term, Neurons, Oscillometry, Visual Cortex, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review