Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 138

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Megalithic tombs in western and northern Neolithic Europe were linked to a kindred society

Sánchez-Quinto, Federico, Malmström, Helena, Fraser, Magdalena, Girdland-Flink, Linus, Svensson, Emma M., Simões, Luciana G., George, Robert, Hollfelder, Nina, Burenhult, Göran, Noble, Gordon, Britton, Kate, Talamo, Sahra, Curtis, Neil, Brzobohata, Hana, Sumberova, Radka, Götherström, Anders, Storå, Jan, Jakobsson, Mattias·2019·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1818037116PMC PMC6511028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Paleogenomic and archaeological studies show that Neolithic lifeways spread from the Fertile Crescent into Europe around 9000 BCE, reaching northwestern Europe by 4000 BCE. Starting around 4500 BCE, a new phenomenon of constructing megalithic monuments, particularly for funerary practices, emerged along the Atlantic façade. While it has been suggested that the emergence of megaliths was associated with the territories of farming communities, the origin and social structure of the groups that erected them has remained largely unknown. We generated genome sequence data from human remains, corresponding to 24 individuals from five megalithic burial sites, encompassing the widespread tradition of megalithic construction in northern and western Europe, and analyzed our results in relation to the existing European paleogenomic data. The various individuals buried in megaliths show genetic affinities with local farming groups within their different chronological contexts. Individuals buried in megaliths display (past) admixture with local hunter-gatherers, similar to that seen in other Neolithic individuals in Europe. In relation to the tomb populations, we find significantly more males than females buried in the megaliths of the British Isles. The genetic data show close kin relationships among the individuals buried within the megaliths, and for the Irish megaliths, we found a kin relation between individuals buried in different megaliths. We also see paternal continuity through time, including the same Y-chromosome haplotypes reoccurring. These observations suggest that the investigated funerary monuments were associated with patrilineal kindred groups. Our genomic investigation provides insight into the people associated with this long-standing megalith funerary tradition, including their social dynamics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1818037116

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Map of Europe with megalithic burial sites (red squares) and nonmegalithic sites (red circles) from this study, and comparative published data from megalithic sites (black squares) sequenced to date in Europe (Dataset S1.3). The date range represents the 95% CI of available samples from these sites, except for La Mina in Spain. Blue shading represents the estimated distribution of early megalithic burials. Bold italic type indicates dates (95% CI) estimated for the start of dolmens and passage grave monuments, based on samples from these contexts. Regular text indicates time interval associated with the earliest cultural material in the megaliths (27, 45).
Fig. 1. Map of Europe with megalithic burial sites (red squares) and nonmegalithic sites (red circles) from this study, and comparative published data from megalithic sites (black squares) sequenced to date in Europe (Dataset S1.3). The date range represents the 95% CI of available samples from these sites, except for La Mina in Spain. Blue shading represents the estimated distribution of early megalithic burials. Bold italic type indicates dates (95% CI) estimated for the start of dolmens and passage grave monuments, based on samples from these contexts. Regular text indicates time interval associated with the earliest cultural material in the megaliths (27, 45).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. (A) PCA of 429 present-day west Europeans (gray dots) with previously published Western HG (WHGs), Atlantic coast and Central European Neolithic farmer samples (filled symbols), and the samples from the present study (shaded symbols) projected onto the first two principal components (more details in SI Appendix, Section S11.1). (B) Inferred ancestry components (assuming seven clusters) of ancient individuals (Methods and SI Appendix, Section S11.2). All individuals to the left of Yoruba are prehistoric individuals, all of which are shotgun-sequenced unless marked with “CP” for SNP capture data. In the label names, the following letters indicate an archaeological context: CA, Chalcolithic; EN, Early Neolithic; N, Neolithic; MN, Middle Neolithic; LN, Late Neolithic. The LN individuals from Portugal come from different sites (key provided in Dataset S1.3).
Fig. 2. (A) PCA of 429 present-day west Europeans (gray dots) with previously published Western HG (WHGs), Atlantic coast and Central European Neolithic farmer samples (filled symbols), and the samples from the present study (shaded symbols) projected onto the first two principal components (more details in SI Appendix, Section S11.1). (B) Inferred ancestry components (assuming seven clusters) of ancient individuals (Methods and SI Appendix, Section S11.2). All individuals to the left of Yoruba are prehistoric individuals, all of which are shotgun-sequenced unless marked with “CP” for SNP capture data. In the label names, the following letters indicate an archaeological context: CA, Chalcolithic; EN, Early Neolithic; N, Neolithic; MN, Middle Neolithic; LN, Late Neolithic. The LN individuals from Portugal come from different sites (key provided in Dataset S1.3).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3. Kinship relationships in the Primrose, Carrowmore, and Ansarve burials. Solid line, first degree; dashed line, second degree. Males are displayed in green; females, in orange. The MtDNA and YDNA haplogroups are presented to the right of the figures. Bars underneath figures represent calibrated dating, with 95% CI (details in Table 1 and SI Appendix, Table S1).
Fig. 3. Kinship relationships in the Primrose, Carrowmore, and Ansarve burials. Solid line, first degree; dashed line, second degree. Males are displayed in green; females, in orange. The MtDNA and YDNA haplogroups are presented to the right of the figures. Bars underneath figures represent calibrated dating, with 95% CI (details in Table 1 and SI Appendix, Table S1).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. P Skoglund, , Origins and genetic legacy of Neolithic farmers and hunter-gatherers in Europe. Science 336, 466–469 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  2. P Skoglund, , Genomic diversity and admixture differs for Stone-Age Scandinavian foragers and farmers. Science 344, 747–750 (2014). · DOI
  3. LM Cassidy, , Neolithic and Bronze Age migration to Ireland and establishment of the insular Atlantic genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113, 368–373 (2016). · DOI
  4. T Günther, M Jakobsson, Genes mirror migrations and cultures in prehistoric Europe: A population genomic perspective. Curr Opin Genet Dev 41, 115–123 (2016). · DOI
  5. A Omrak, , Genomic evidence establishes Anatolia as the source of the European Neolithic gene pool. Curr Biol 26, 270–275 (2016). · DOI
  6. GM Kılınç, , The demographic development of the first farmers in Anatolia. Curr Biol 26, 2659–2666 (2016). · DOI
  7. C Valdiosera, , Four millennia of Iberian biomolecular prehistory illustrate the impact of prehistoric migrations at the far end of Eurasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115, 3428–3433 (2018). · DOI
  8. I Olalde, , A common genetic origin for early farmers from Mediterranean cardial and central European LBK cultures. Mol Biol Evol 32, 3132–3142 (2015).
  9. R Bradley The Prehistory of Britain and Ireland (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007). · DOI
  10. I Olalde, , The beaker phenomenon and the genomic transformation of northwest Europe. Nature 555, 190–196 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  11. M Fraser People of the Dolmens and Stone Cists: An Archaeogenetic Investigation of Megalithic Graves from the Neolithic Period on Gotland. PhD dissertation (Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden). (2018).
  12. A Mittnik, , The genetic prehistory of the Baltic Sea region. Nat Commun 9, 442 (2018). · DOI
  13. R Joussaume Dolmens for the Dead: Megalith-Building Throughout the World (B.T. Batsford, London, 1988).
  14. AW Whittle Europe in the Neolithic : The Creation of New Worlds (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996).
  15. JA Sheridan The chronology of Irish megalithic tombs. Stones and Bones: Formal Disposal of the Dead in Atlantic Europe During the Mesolithic-Neolithic Interface 6000–3000 BC . British Archaeological Reports International Series 1201 eds Burenhult G Westergaard S (Archaeopress Oxford UK) pp 69–73. (2003).
  16. JA Sheridan The Neolithization of Britain and Ireland: The “Big Picture.” Landscapes in Transition Levant Supplementary Series 8 eds Finlayson B Warren GM (Oxbow Oxford UK) pp 89–105. (2010).
  17. JA Sheridan, Interdigitating pasts: The Irish and Scottish Neolithics. The Neolithic of Europe. Papers in Honour of Alasdair Whittle, eds P Bickle, V Cummings, D Hofmann, J Pollard (Oxbow, Oxford, UK), pp. 298–313 (2017). · DOI
  18. C Scarre The Megalithic Monuments of Britain and Ireland (Thames and Hudson, New York, 2007).
  19. M Collard, K Edinborough, S Shennan, MG Thomas, Radiocarbon evidence indicates that migrants introduced farming to Britain. J Archaeol Sci 37, 866–870 (2010). · DOI
  20. T Darvill, Megalithic tombs, barrows, and enclosures in forth millennium BC Britain. Giants in the landscape: Monumentality and territories in the European Neolithic. Proceedings of the XVII UISPP World Congress (1-7 September, Burgos, Spain), eds V Ard, L Pillot (Archaeopress, Oxford, UK) Vol 3/Session A25d, 3–17 (2016).
  21. TR McLaughlin, , The changing face of Neolithic and Bronze Age Ireland: A big data approach to the settlement and burial records. J World Prehist 29, 117–153 (2016). · DOI
  22. B Schulz Paulsson Time and Stone: The Emergence and Development of Megaliths and Megalithic Societies in Europe (Archaeopress, Oxford, UK, 2017). · DOI
  23. V Cummings, M Midgley, C Scarre, Chambered tombs and passage graves of Western and Northern Europe. The Oxford Handbook of Neolithic Europe, eds C Fowler, J Harding, D Hofmann (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK), pp. 813–838 (2015).
  24. MS Midgley The Megaliths of Northern Europe (Routledge, London, 2008). · DOI
  25. M Midgley, Monuments and monumentality: The cosmological model of the world of megaliths. Doc Praehist XXXVII, 55–64 (2010). · DOI
  26. MS Midgley, Megaliths in North-West Europe. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Death and Burial, eds L Nilsson-Stut, S Tarlow (Oxford Univ Press, Oxford, UK, 2013).
  27. A Fleming, Tombs for the living. Man (Lond) 8, 177 (1973).
  28. A Sherratt, The genesis of megaliths: Monumentality, ethnicity and social complexity in Neolithic North-West Europe. World Archaeol 22, 147–167 (1990). · DOI
  29. L Klassen Frühes Kupfer im Norden. Untersuchungen zu Chronologie, Herkunft und Bedeutung der Kupferfunde der Nordgruppe der Trichterbecherkultur (Jutland Archaeological Society, Højbjerg, Denmark) Vol 36 (2000).
  30. J Müller Megaliths and Funnel Beakers: Societies in Change 4100–2700 BC (Drieendertigste Kroon-Voordracht, Amsterdam, 2011).
  31. EJ Lee, , Collective burials among agro-pastoral societies in later Neolithic Germany: Perspectives from ancient DNA. J Archaeol Sci 51, 174–180 (2014). · DOI
  32. C Renfrew Before Civilisation: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe (Penguin, London, 1973).
  33. K-G Sjögren, Kinship, labor, and land in Neolithic southwest Sweden: Social aspects of megalithic graves. J Anthropol Archaeol 5, 229–265 (1986). · DOI
  34. M Furholt, J Müller, The earliest monuments in Europe: Architecture and social structures (5000–3000 cal BC). Early Monuments and Neolithic Societies from the Atlantic to the Baltic, eds M Furholt, F Lüth, J Müller (Frühe Monumentalität und soziale Differenzierung, Bonn, Germany), pp. 15–32 (2011).
  35. C Renfrew, Megaliths, territories and populations. Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe, ed SJ de Laet (De Tempel, Bruges, Belgium), pp. 198–220 (1976).
  36. C Renfrew The Megalithic Monuments of Western Europe (Thames and Hudson, London, 1981).
  37. H Malmström, , Ancient DNA reveals lack of continuity between Neolithic hunter-gatherers and contemporary Scandinavians. Curr Biol 19, 1758–1762 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  38. M Fraser, , New insights on cultural dualism and population structure in the Middle Neolithic Funnel Beaker culture on the island of Gotland. J Archaeol Sci Reports 17, 325–334 (2018). · DOI
  39. R Martiniano, , The population genomics of archaeological transition in west Iberia: Investigation of ancient substructure using imputation and haplotype-based methods. PLoS Genet 13, e1006852 (2017). · DOI
  40. S Brace Population replacement in early Neolithic Britain. BioRxiv:10.1101/267443. Preprint posted February 18 2018. (2018). · DOI
  41. P Rowley-Conwy, Westward ho! Curr Anthropol 52, S431–S451 (2011). · DOI
  42. M Rivollat, , When the waves of European neolithization met: First paleogenetic evidence from early farmers in the southern Paris basin. PLoS One 10, e0125521 (2015). · DOI
  43. A Goldberg, T Günther, NA Rosenberg, M Jakobsson, Ancient X chromosomes reveal contrasting sex bias in Neolithic and Bronze Age Eurasian migrations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114, 2657–2662 (2017). · DOI
  44. ER Jones, , The Neolithic transition in the Baltic was not driven by admixture with early European farmers. Curr Biol 27, 576–582 (2017). · DOI
  45. T Günther, , Population genomics of Mesolithic Scandinavia: Investigating early postglacial migration routes and high-latitude adaptation. PLoS Biol 16, e2003703 (2018). · DOI
  46. I Mathieson, , The genomic history of southeastern Europe. Nature 555, 197–203 (2018). · DOI
  47. DY Yang, B Eng, JS Waye, JC Dudar, SR Saunders, Technical note: Improved DNA extraction from ancient bones using silica-based spin columns. Am J Phys Anthropol 105, 539–543 (1998). · DOI
  48. M Kircher, Analysis of high-throughput ancient DNA sequencing data. Ancient DNA, Methods in Molecular Biology, eds B Shapiro, M Hofreiter (Humana Press, Totowa, NJ), pp. 197–228 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  49. H Li, R Durbin, Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  50. G Jun, , Detecting and estimating contamination of human DNA samples in sequencing and array-based genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 91, 839–848 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  51. M van Oven, PhyloTree Build 17: Growing the human mitochondrial DNA tree. Forensic Sci International Genet Suppl Ser 5, e392–e394 (2015). · DOI
  52. H Weissensteiner, , HaploGrep 2: Mitochondrial haplogroup classification in the era of high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 44, W58–W63 (2016). · DOI
  53. C Wang, , Comparing spatial maps of human population-genetic variation using Procrustes analysis. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 9, 13 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  54. DH Alexander, J Novembre, K Lange, Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res 19, 1655–1664 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  55. AA Behr, KZ Liu, G Liu-Fang, P Nakka, S Ramachandran, pong: Fast analysis and visualization of latent clusters in population genetic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2817–2823 (2016). · DOI

Cited by

See all 138

Metadata

Authors
Sánchez-Quinto, F., Malmström, H., Fraser, M., Girdland-Flink, L., Svensson, E. M., Simões, L. G., George, R., Hollfelder, N., Burenhult, G., Noble, G., Britton, K., Talamo, S., Curtis, N., Brzobohata, H., Sumberova, R., Götherström, A., Storå, J., & Jakobsson, M.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences
Published
2019-04-15
Volume
116
Issue
19
Pages
9469-9474
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
DOI
10.1073/pnas.1818037116
PMC
PMC6511028
Cited by
138
References
17
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (M13-0904:1)
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (N/A)
  • Berit Wallenberg foundation (N/A)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review