Cited by 76Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Formation of global self-beliefs in the human brain

Open access
Rouault, Marion, Fleming, Stephen M.·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Momentary feelings of confidence accompany many of our actions and decisions. In addition to such “local” feelings of confidence, we also construct “global” confidence estimates about our skills and abilities (global self-performance estimates or SPEs). Distorted SPEs may have a pervasive impact on motivation and self-evaluation, for instance affecting estimates of our competitiveness at work or in a sports team. Here, we found that components of a brain network previously implicated in the tracking of local confidence was additionally modulated by SPE level, whereas ventral striatum tracked SPEs irrespective of confidence. Our findings of a neurocognitive basis for global SPEs lay the groundwork for understanding how distorted SPEs arise in educational and clinical settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2003094117

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • vmPFC and precuneus integrate local confidence over longer timescales to track aggregate self-performance.

    “Global confidence was informed by local confidence fluctuations during the previous block, and using fMRI, it was found that vmPFC and precuneus integrate local confidence over longer timescales to track aggregate self-performance (Rouault & Fleming 2020, Wittmann et al. 2016).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Rouault & Fleming 2020

    The Results section, “Local Confidence Activity Sensitive to Global SPEs,” reports that vmPFC and precuneus activity tracked local confidence differently depending on global self-performance estimates. The Discussion offers accumulation of local confidence across a block as one possible interpretation, not an established finding that these regions integrate it over longer timescales. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. [1]J. Dunlosky, J. Metcalfe, Metacognition, (Sage Publications, 2008).
  2. [2]M. Guggenmos, G. Wilbertz, M. N. Hebart, P. Sterzer, Mesolimbic confidence signals guide perceptual learning in the absence of external feedback. eLife 5, e13388 (2016). 27021283 PMC4821804
  3. [4]A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84, 191– 215 (1977). 847061
  4. [6]R. Elliott., Neuropsychological impairments in unipolar depression: The influence of perceived failure on subsequent performance. Psychol. Med. 26, 975– 989 (1996). 8878330
  5. [8]D. D. P. Johnson, J. H. Fowler, The evolution of overconfidence. Nature 477, 317– 320 (2011). 21921915
  6. [10]M. Rouault, T. Seow, C. M. Gillan, S. M. Fleming, Psychiatric symptom dimensions are associated with dissociable shifts in metacognition but not task performance. Biol. Psychiatry 84, 443– 451 (2018). 29458997 PMC6117452
  7. [13]A. Kepecs, N. Uchida, H. A. Zariwala, Z. F. Mainen, Neural correlates, computation and behavioural impact of decision confidence. Nature 455, 227– 231 (2008). 18690210
  8. [14]C. B. Holroyd, M. G. H. Coles, The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychol. Rev. 109, 679– 709 (2002). 12374324
  9. [15]A. Boldt, N. Yeung, Shared neural markers of decision confidence and error detection. J. Neurosci. 35, 3478– 3484 (2015). 25716847 PMC4339357
  10. [16]S. M. Fleming, E. J. van der Putten, N. D. Daw, Neural mediators of changes of mind about perceptual decisions. Nat. Neurosci. 21, 617– 624 (2018). 29531361 PMC5878683
  11. [17]M. S. Fleck, S. M. Daselaar, I. G. Dobbins, R. Cabeza, Role of prefrontal and anterior cingulate regions in decision-making processes shared by memory and nonmemory tasks. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1623– 1630 (2006). 16400154
  12. [18]J. Heereman, H. Walter, H. R. Heekeren, A task-independent neural representation of subjective certainty in visual perception. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9, 551 (2015). 26500523 PMC4599046
  13. [19]M. K. Wittmann., Self-other mergence in the frontal cortex during cooperation and competition. Neuron 91, 482– 493 (2016). 27477020 PMC4961240
  14. [22]B. De Martino, S. M. Fleming, N. Garrett, R. J. Dolan, Confidence in value-based choice. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 105– 110 (2013). 23222911 PMC3786394
  15. [23]M. Lebreton, R. Abitbol, J. Daunizeau, M. Pessiglione, Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 1159– 1167 (2015). 26192748
  16. [25]J. Morales, H. Lau, S. M. Fleming, Domain-general and domain-specific patterns of activity supporting metacognition in human prefrontal cortex. J. Neurosci. 38, 3534– 3546 (2018). 29519851 PMC5895040
  17. [26]S. M. Fleming, R. S. Weil, Z. Nagy, R. J. Dolan, G. Rees, Relating introspective accuracy to individual differences in brain structure. Science 329, 1541– 1543 (2010). 20847276 PMC3173849
  18. [27]K. Christoff, J. Ream, L. P. T. Geddes, J. D. E. Gabrieli, Evaluating self-generated information: Anterior prefrontal contributions to human cognition. Behav. Neurosci. 117, 1161– 1168 (2003). 14674837
  19. [28]R. Daniel, S. Pollmann, Striatal activations signal prediction errors on confidence in the absence of external feedback. Neuroimage 59, 3457– 3467 (2012). 22146752
  20. [30]R. C. Wilson, Y. K. Takahashi, G. Schoenbaum, Y. Niv, Orbitofrontal cortex as a cognitive map of task space. Neuron 81, 267– 279 (2014). 24462094 PMC4001869
  21. [31]N. W. Schuck., Medial prefrontal cortex predicts internally driven strategy shifts. Neuron 86, 331– 340 (2015). 25819613 PMC4425426
  22. [32]B. A. Purcell, R. Kiani, Hierarchical decision processes that operate over distinct timescales underlie choice and changes in strategy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, E4531– E4540 (2016). 27432960 PMC4978308
  23. [33]M. Donoso, A. G. E. Collins, E. Koechlin, Human cognition. Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex. Science 344, 1481– 1486 (2014). 24876345
  24. [35]T. Sharot, C. W. Korn, R. J. Dolan, How unrealistic optimism is maintained in the face of reality. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1475– 1479 (2011). 21983684 PMC3204264
  25. [36]G. Lefebvre, M. Lebreton, F. Meyniel, S. Bourgeois-Gironde, S. Palminteri, Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0067 (2017).
  26. [37]A. Lopez-Persem, L. Verhagen, C. Amiez, M. Petrides, J. Sallet, The human ventromedial prefrontal cortex: Sulcal morphology and its influence on functional organization. J. Neurosci. 39, 3627– 3639 (2019). 30833514 PMC6510347
  27. [38]M. Pereira., Disentangling the origins of confidence in speeded perceptual judgments through multimodal imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 8382– 8390 (2020). 32238562 PMC7165419
  28. [39]S. Moritz, J. Gläscher, T. Sommer, C. Büchel, D. F. Braus, Neural correlates of memory confidence. Neuroimage 33, 1188– 1193 (2006). 17029986
  29. [40]A. G. Vaccaro, S. M. Fleming, Thinking about thinking: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies of metacognitive judgements. Brain Neurosci. Adv. 2, 2398212818810591 (2018). 30542659 PMC6238228
  30. [41]T. P. White, N. H. Engen, S. Sørensen, M. Overgaard, S. S. Shergill, Uncertainty and confidence from the triple-network perspective: Voxel-based meta-analyses. Brain Cogn. 85, 191– 200 (2014). 24424423
  31. [42]R. E. Passingham, S. L. Bengtsson, H. C. Lau, Medial frontal cortex: From self-generated action to reflection on one’s own performance. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14, 16– 21 (2009). 19969501 PMC2806969
  32. [43]A. E. Cavanna, M. R. Trimble, The precuneus: A review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 129, 564– 583 (2006). 16399806
  33. [44]H. E. M. den Ouden, U. Frith, C. Frith, S.-J. Blakemore, Thinking about intentions. NeuroImage 28, 787– 796 (2005). 15964210
  34. [45]M. Lebreton, S. Jorge, V. Michel, B. Thirion, M. Pessiglione, An automatic valuation system in the human brain: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Neuron 64, 431– 439 (2009). 19914190
  35. [46]M. Rouault, J. Drugowitsch, E. Koechlin, Prefrontal mechanisms combining rewards and beliefs in human decision-making. Nat. Commun. 10, 301 (2019). 30655534 PMC6336816
  36. [47]R. Frömer, C. K. Dean Wolf, A. Shenhav, Goal congruency dominates reward value in accounting for behavioral and neural correlates of value-based decision-making. Nat. Commun. 10, 4926 (2019). 31664035 PMC6820735
  37. [48]J. V. Baranski, W. M. Petrusic, Testing architectures of the decision–confidence relation. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 55, 195– 206 (2001). 11605555
  38. [49]A. L. Mitchum, C. M. Kelley, M. C. Fox, When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 200– 219 (2016). 27045282
  39. [50]B. Maniscalco, H. Lau, A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings. Conscious. Cogn. 21, 422– 430 (2012). 22071269
  40. [51]S. M. Fleming, HMeta-d: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings. Neurosci. Conscious. 2017, nix007 (2017). 29877507 PMC5858026
  41. [52]J. P. Mugler 3rd, J. R. Brookeman, Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn. Reson. Med. 15, 152– 157 (1990). 2374495
  42. [53]C. Hutton., The impact of physiological noise correction on fMRI at 7 T. Neuroimage 57, 101– 112 (2011). 21515386 PMC3115139
  43. [54]G. H. Glover, T. Q. Li, D. Ress, Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn. Reson. Med. 44, 162– 167 (2000). 10893535
  44. [55]O. Josephs, A. M. Howseman, K. Friston, R. Turner, “ Physiological noise modelling for multi-slice EPI fMRI using SPM” in Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Vancouver, Canada, (International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Concord, CA, 1997), p. 1682.
  45. [56]R. M. Birn, J. B. Diamond, M. A. Smith, P. A. Bandettini, Separating respiratory-variation-related fluctuations from neuronal-activity-related fluctuations in fMRI. Neuroimage 31, 1536– 1548 (2006). 16632379
  46. [57]R. M. Birn, M. A. Smith, T. B. Jones, P. A. Bandettini, The respiration response function: The temporal dynamics of fMRI signal fluctuations related to changes in respiration. Neuroimage 40, 644– 654 (2008). 18234517 PMC2533266
  47. [58]C. Chang, G. H. Glover, Effects of model-based physiological noise correction on default mode network anti-correlations and correlations. Neuroimage 47, 1448– 1459 (2009). 19446646 PMC2995588

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rouault, M., & Fleming, S. M.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Corresponding author
Rouault, Marion
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-10-15
Volume
117
Issue
44
Pages
27268-27276
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3092949476
Cited by
76
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8
FWCI
4.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (203147/Z/16/Z)
  • Wellcome Trust and Royal Society (206648/Z/17/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
metacognition, self-confidence, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, precuneus, ventral striatum, frontoparietal network, task difficulty, self-assessment
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Psychomotor Performance, Self Concept, Prefrontal Cortex, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review