Cited by 39Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsFace Recognition and Perception

Neurocomputational mechanisms of confidence in self and others

Open access
Bang, Dan, Moran, Rani, Daw, Nathaniel D., Fleming, Stephen M.·2022·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Computing confidence in one's own and others' decisions is critical for social success. While there has been substantial progress in our understanding of confidence estimates about oneself, little is known about how people form confidence estimates about others. Here, we address this question by asking participants undergoing fMRI to place bets on perceptual decisions made by themselves or one of three other players of varying ability. We show that participants compute confidence in another player's decisions by combining distinct estimates of player ability and decision difficulty - allowing them to predict that a good player may get a difficult decision wrong and that a bad player may get an easy decision right. We find that this computation is associated with an interaction between brain systems implicated in decision-making (LIP) and theory of mind (TPJ and dmPFC). These results reveal an interplay between self- and other-related processes during a social confidence computation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-022-31674-w

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent brain imaging studies suggest that propositional confidence formation in self and other draws on distinct brain networks, but dorsomedial PFC may act as a common node for furnishing model-based information for both metacognition and mentalizing.

    “Recent brain imaging studies suggest that propositional confidence formation in self and other draws on distinct brain networks (Bang et al. 2022, Jiang et al. 2022), but dorsomedial PFC may act as a common node for furnishing model-based information for both metacognition and mentalizing ( Jiang et al. 2022, Wittmann et al. 2016).”

    From Metacognition and Confidence: A Review and Synthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Bang et al. 2022

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [37]Saxe R Uniquely human social cognition Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2006 16 235 239 10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.001 16546372 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [38]Frith CD Frith U Mechanisms of social cognition Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2012 63 287 313 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100449 21838544 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [41]Fleming SM Van Der Putten EJ Daw ND Neural mediators of changes of mind about perceptual decisions Nat. Neurosci. 2018 21 617 624 10.1038/s41593-018-0104-6 29531361 PMC5878683 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [57]Green, D. & Swets, J. Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics (Wiley, 1966).
  5. [58]Kucukelbir A Ranganath R Gelman A Blei DM Automatic variational inference in Stan Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2015 28 568 576

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bang, D., Moran, R., Daw, N. D., & Fleming, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Bang, Dan
  • Fleming, Stephen M.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2022-07-22
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
4238-4238
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286697375
Cited by
39
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (213630/Z/18/Z)
  • John Templeton Foundation (61454)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
social confidence, perceptual decision making, decision difficulty, lateral intraparietal area, theory of mind, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, posterior parietal cortex, social cognition
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review