Cited by 284Ecosystem dynamics and resilienceChaos control and synchronizationMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning for early warning signals of tipping points

Open access

Abstract

Significance: Early warning signals (EWS) of tipping points are vital to anticipate system collapse or other sudden shifts. However, existing generic early warning indicators designed to work across all systems do not provide information on the state that lies beyond the tipping point. Our results show how deep learning algorithms (artificial intelligence) can provide EWS of tipping points in real-world systems. The algorithm predicts certain qualitative aspects of the new state, and is also more sensitive and generates fewer false positives than generic indicators. We use theory about system behavior near tipping points so that the algorithm does not require data from the study system but instead learns from a universe of possible models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2106140118

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Trends in indicators prior to three different bifurcations in ecological models. (A–C) Trajectory (gray) and smoothing (black) of a simulation of an ecological model going through a fold, Hopf, and transcritical bifurcation, respectively. (D–F) Lag-1 AC computed over a rolling window (arrow) of width 0.25. (G–I) Variance. (J–L) Probabilities assigned to the fold (purple), Hopf (orange), and transcritical (cyan) bifurcation by the DL algorithm. The vertical dashed line marks the time at which the system crosses the bifurcation.
Fig. 1. Trends in indicators prior to three different bifurcations in ecological models. (A–C) Trajectory (gray) and smoothing (black) of a simulation of an ecological model going through a fold, Hopf, and transcritical bifurcation, respectively. (D–F) Lag-1 AC computed over a rolling window (arrow) of width 0.25. (G–I) Variance. (J–L) Probabilities assigned to the fold (purple), Hopf (orange), and transcritical (cyan) bifurcation by the DL algorithm. The vertical dashed line marks the time at which the system crosses the bifurcation.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. ROC curves for predictions using 80 to 100% of the pretransition time series for model and empirical data. ROC curves compare the performance of the DL algorithm (blue), variance (red), and lag-1 AC (green) in predicting an upcoming transition. The area under the curve (AUC), abbreviated to A, is a measure of performance. Insets show the frequency of the favored DL probability among the forced trajectories: (F)old, (T)ranscritical, (H)opf, or (N)eutral. (A) May’s harvesting model going through a fold bifurcation; (B and C) consumer−resource model going through a (B) Hopf and (C) transcritical bifurcation; (D and E) behavior−disease model going through a transcritical bifurcation using data from (D) provaccine opinion (x) and (E) total infectious (I); (F) sediment data showing rapid transitions to an anoxic states in the Mediterranean sea; (G) data of a thermoacoustic system undergoing a Hopf bifurcation; and (H) ice core records showing rapid transitions in paleoclimate data. The diagonal dashed line marks where a classifier works no better than a random coin toss.
Fig. 2. ROC curves for predictions using 80 to 100% of the pretransition time series for model and empirical data. ROC curves compare the performance of the DL algorithm (blue), variance (red), and lag-1 AC (green) in predicting an upcoming transition. The area under the curve (AUC), abbreviated to A, is a measure of performance. Insets show the frequency of the favored DL probability among the forced trajectories: (F)old, (T)ranscritical, (H)opf, or (N)eutral. (A) May’s harvesting model going through a fold bifurcation; (B and C) consumer−resource model going through a (B) Hopf and (C) transcritical bifurcation; (D and E) behavior−disease model going through a transcritical bifurcation using data from (D) provaccine opinion (x) and (E) total infectious (I); (F) sediment data showing rapid transitions to an anoxic states in the Mediterranean sea; (G) data of a thermoacoustic system undergoing a Hopf bifurcation; and (H) ice core records showing rapid transitions in paleoclimate data. The diagonal dashed line marks where a classifier works no better than a random coin toss.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 3. CNN-LSTM architecture.
Fig. 3. CNN-LSTM architecture.CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bury, T. M., Sujith, R. I., Pavithran, I., Scheffer, M., Lenton, T. M., Anand, M., & Bauch, C. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Bauch, Chris T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-09-20
Volume
118
Issue
39
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3200303296
Cited by
284
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 2
FWCI
16.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Gouvernement du Canada | Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN 2019, RGPIN 2020)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
tipping points, early warning indicators, normal forms, dynamical systems, deep learning, state transitions, lag-1 autocorrelation, variance, scaling behavior, model-free prediction, ecological tipping points, thermoacoustics, climate tipping points

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review