Cited by 4,268Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 23 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease.

Open access
Strittmatter, W J, Saunders, A M, Schmechel, D, Pericak-Vance, M, Enghild, J, Salvesen, G S, Roses, A D·1993·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Apolipoprotein E is immunochemically localized to the senile plaques, vascular amyloid, and neurofibrillary tangles of Alzheimer disease. In vitro, apolipoprotein E in cerebrospinal fluid binds to synthetic beta A4 peptide (the primary constituent of the senile plaque) with high avidity. Amino acids 12-28 of the beta A4 peptide are required. The gene for apolipoprotein E is located on chromosome 19q13.2, within the region previously associated with linkage of late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Analysis of apolipoprotein E alleles in Alzheimer disease and controls demonstrated that there was a highly significant association of apolipoprotein E type 4 allele (APOE-epsilon 4) and late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. The allele frequency of the APOE-epsilon 4 in 30 random affected patients, each from a different Alzheimer disease family, was 0.50 +/- 0.06; the allele frequency of APOE-epsilon 4 in 91 age-matched unrelated controls was 0.16 +/- 0.03 (Z = 2.44, P = 0.014). A functional role of the apolipoprotein E-E4 isoform in the pathogenesis of late-onset familial Alzheimer disease is suggested.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 23 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 20 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 12
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 19
24 of 24
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In vitro binding of ApoE to synthetic beta-A4 peptides reflects a biologically relevant interaction that occurs in vivo.

    “Using this technique, we have demonstrated high-avidity binding of ApoE in CSF to ,BA4 peptide.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The 91 unrelated CEPH grandparents used as controls are genetically comparable to the familial Alzheimer disease cases, so the allele frequency difference is not due to population stratification.

    “Controls used in the study were 91 unrelated grandparents from the Centre d'Etude du Polymorphisme Humain (16).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The two early-onset families in the sample do not materially affect the association between APOE-e4 and late-onset familial Alzheimer disease.

    “In 28 of the families the disease was of the late-onset type (mean age of onset >60 years of age), and in 2 of the families, early onset (mean age of onset < 60 years of age).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Localization of ApoE to Alzheimer disease lesions indicates a functional pathogenetic role rather than a secondary or incidental association.

    “The ldcalization of ApoE to the defining pathological lesions of Alzheimer disease suggests a functional pathogenetic role for ApoE.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The synthetic beta-A4 peptide fragments used in the binding assay reproduce the relevant structural features of native beta-A4 in senile plaques.

    “Preparation of Immobilized Peptides.fA4 peptides (Bachem) and other peptides were covalently immobilized on Immobilon AV affmity membrane (Millipore).”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Consistentz = 2.44reported p = .014 · recomputed p = .015

    “(Z = 2.44, p = .014”

  • Consistentz = 2.44reported p = .014 · recomputed p = .015

    “Z = 2.44, p = .014”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]2. Ignatius, M. J., Gebicke-Harter, P. J., Skene, J. H. P., Schill- ing, J. W., Weisgraber, K. H., Mahley, R. W. & Shooter, E. M. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 1125-1129.
  2. [5]5. Elshourbagy, N. A., Liao, W. S., Mahley, R. W. & Taylor, J. M. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82, 203-207.
  3. [7]7. Snipes, G. J., McGuire, C. B., Norden, J. J. & Freeman, J. A. (1986) Proc. Nat!. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 1130-1134.
  4. [22]22. Roses, A. D., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Saunders, A. M., Schmechel, D., Goldgaber, D. & Strittmatter, W. (1993) Epi- lepsia, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4,268

Metadata

Authors
Strittmatter, W. J., Saunders, A. M., Schmechel, D., Pericak-Vance, M., Enghild, J., Salvesen, G. S., & Roses, A. D.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Department of Medicine (Neurology), Joseph and Kathleen Bryan Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1993-03
Volume
90
Issue
5
Pages
1977-1981
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2021181758
Cited by
4,268
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 107 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 108 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 111 · 2018: 117 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 121 · 2015: 140 · 2014: 123 · 2013: 112 · 2012: 134
FWCI
125.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r35ag007922-07)
  • National Institute on Aging (5P50 AG-O5128, P50AG005128, 5R35 AG-O7922)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, amyloid-beta, amyloid plaques, amyloid binding, allele frequency, genetic association, Alzheimer disease pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Alleles, Alzheimer Disease, Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Brain, Gene Frequency, Humans, Lemur, Molecular Sequence Data, Peptides, Protein Binding, Solubility, Amyloid beta-Peptides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-01, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-01 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review