Cited by 541Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Inhibition of human telomerase in immortal human cells leads to progressive telomere shortening and cell death

Open access
Herbert, B.-S., Pitts, A. E., Baker, S. I., Hamilton, S. E., Wright, W. E., Shay, J. W., Corey, D. R.·1999·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The correlation between telomerase activity and human tumors has led to the hypothesis that tumor growth requires reactivation of telomerase and that telomerase inhibitors represent a class of chemotherapeutic agents. Herein, we examine the effects of inhibition of telomerase inside human cells. Peptide nucleic acid and 2′ -O- MeRNA oligomers inhibit telomerase, leading to progressive telomere shortening and causing immortal human breast epithelial cells to undergo apoptosis with increasing frequency until no cells remain. Telomere shortening is reversible: if inhibitor addition is terminated, telomeres regain their initial lengths. Our results validate telomerase as a target for the discovery of anticancer drugs and supply general insights into the properties that successful agents will require regardless of chemical type. Chemically similar oligonucleotides are in clinical trials and have well characterized pharmacokinetics, making the inhibitors we describe practical lead compounds for testing for an antitelomerase chemotherapeutic strategy.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Inhibiting telomerase in immortal human cells with 2′-O-MeRNA or PNA oligonucleotides caused progressive telomere shortening, apoptosis, and eventual loss of proliferation. Telomere shortening and growth arrest were reversible when inhibitor treatment was stopped.

Key findings

  • Complementary 2′-O-MeRNA inhibited >95% of telomerase activity 1 day after transfection and >70% at 3 days. HME50-5E proliferation slowed after 15–25 days, and no treated cells remained after 110 days; apoptosis rose from <5% during the first 60 days to 14% at 80 days and 56% at 100 days, versus 2–3% in controls.
  • DU145 cells began slowing after 60 days and had undergone 20 fewer population doublings than mismatch-treated cells by 120 days. HME50-hTERT cells, with longer telomeres, showed no significant growth reduction over 120 days.
  • Mean telomere restriction fragment length decreased from 2,000 to 1,700 bp in HME50-5E cells by 60 days, from 3,600 to 2,200 bp in DU145 cells by 76 days, and from 7,600 to 6,800 bp in HME50-hTERT cells after 75 days. A template-directed PNA inhibited >90% of telomerase activity at 1 day and shortened telomeres, whereas a nontemplate PNA inhibited only 50% and did not shorten telomeres.
  • After inhibitor withdrawal at 76 days, eroded telomeres returned to approximately initial lengths within 3 weeks, and previously static HME50-5E cells regained growth within 3 weeks. No evidence for an ALT pathway was observed.

Methods

  • Immortal human cell lines HME50-5E, DU145, and HME50-hTERT were transfected with 2′-O-MeRNA or PNA/DNA complexes using cationic lipids; treatment was repeated every 3–4 days for 120 days, with mismatch oligomers, lipid alone, or nontemplate PNA as controls.
  • Telomerase activity was measured by TRAP, mean telomere length by telomere restriction fragment Southern analysis, apoptosis by Annexin V flow cytometry, and proliferation by cell counts/population doublings.
  • Effects of matched versus mismatched or nontemplate inhibitors were compared over time to test sequence-specific, telomerase-dependent mechanisms.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: the TRF assay does not monitor subtelomeric erosion and may underestimate total telomeric DNA loss; 5–30% of telomerase activity remained after treatment; systemic telomerase inhibition would also affect normal stem cells; the long lag before phenotypic effects complicates drug development; and no ALT pathway was observed in these cell types, leaving applicability to ALT-positive tumors uncertain.
  • Evident from the text: findings are in vitro in a small number of immortal cell lines, including p53-mutant lines, with no animal or human efficacy/toxicity data; the 120-day culture experiments required stringent precautions against contamination but remain vulnerable to long-term culture artifacts.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14276

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 49 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Results

    By 100 days, 56% of HME50-5E cells treated with match oligomer underwent apoptosis.

    “and this percentage increased to 56% after 100 days”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Within 60 days of treatment, the mean telomere length of HME50-5E cells treated with 2'-O-MeRNA complementary to hTR was reduced from 2,000 to 1,700 bp.

    “Within 60 days of treatment, the mean telomere length of HME50-5E cells treated with 2′-O-MeRNA complementary to hTR was reduced from 2,000 to 1,700 bp (Fig. 4a).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Abstract

    Inhibition of telomerase by 2'-O-MeRNA leads to progressive telomere shortening.

    “leading to progressive telomere shortening”
    • Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
      “cause telomeres to shorten”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    Growth of HME50-5E cells treated with control mismatch oligomer was not affected.

    “The growth of cells treated with the control oligomer containing mismatch bases was not affected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Results

    By 80 days, 14% of HME50-5E cells treated with match oligomer underwent apoptosis.

    “By 80 days, however, 14% of cells treated with the match oligomer were observed to undergo apoptosis”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 14
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Results

    The TRF length of HME50-5E cells treated with mismatch 2'-O-MeRNA remained at 2,000 bp, and the signal intensity of probe hybridization was undiminished.

    “The TRF length of cells treated with 2-O-MeRNA containing mismatches relative to hTR remained at 2,000 bp, and the signal intensity of probe hybridization was undiminished.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Discussion

    Telomere shortening and decreased cell proliferation were observed even though between 5% and 30% of telomerase activity remained after treatment with inhibitor.

    “We observe telomere shortening and decreased cell proliferation, even though between 5% and 30% of telomerase activity remained after treatment with inhibitor.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Telomerase activity has been found in almost all human tumors but not in adjacent normal cells.

    “Telomerase activity has been found in almost all human tumors but not in adjacent normal cells (3, 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [3] Kim N W, Piatyszek M A, Prowse K R, Harley C B, West M D, Ho P L C, Coviello G M, Wright W E, Weinrich S L, Shay J W. Science. 1994;266:2011–2015. doi: 10.1126/science.7605428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Counter C M, Hirte H W, Bachetti S, Harley C B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:2900–2904. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.8.2900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Human telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein that adds repeated units of TTAGGG to the ends of telomeres.

    “Human telomerase is a ribonucleoprotein that adds repeated units of TTAGGG to the ends of telomeres (1, 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Morin G B. Cell. 1989;59:521–529. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] Bryan T M, Cech T R. Curr OpIN Cell Biol. 1999;11:318–324. doi: 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80043-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Materials and Methods

    The levels of telomerase activity were within the linear range of the TRAP assay.

    “The levels of telomerase activity were within the linear range of the TRAP assay (40).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Holt S E, Norton J C, Wright W E, Shay J W. Methods Cell Sci. 1996;18:237–248. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Telomerase activity is correlated with tumor aggressiveness.

    “or tumor aggressiveness (11, 12).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Ohyashiki J H, Ohyashiki K, Iwama I, Hayashi S, Toyama K, Shay J W. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:619–625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] Hoos A, Hepp H H, Kaul S, Ahlert T, Bastert G, Wallwiener D. Int J Cancer. 1998;79:8–12. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980220)79:1<8::aid-ijc2>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Abstract

    Recent reports of the effect of the mTR deletion in different genetic backgrounds suggest that the role of telomerase in cancer development could be highly context dependent.

    “recent reports of the effect of the mTR deletion in different genetic backgrounds (17, 18) suggest that the role of telomerase in cancer development could be highly context dependent (19).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [17] Greenberg R, Chin L, Femino A, Lee K, Gottlieb G J, Greider C W, DePinho R A. Cell. 1999;97:515–525. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80761-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] Chin L, Artandi S E, Shen Q, Tam A, Lee S L, Gottlieb G J, Greider C W, DePinho R A. Cell. 1999;97:527–538. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80762-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] de Lange T, Jacks T. Cell. 1999;98:273–275. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81955-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    In est1-deleted yeast, cells divide normally until telomeres shorten sufficiently to affect proliferation, at which stage most cells die.

    “The cells divide normally until telomeres shorten sufficiently to affect proliferation. At this stage, most cells die”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Lunblad V, Blackburn E H. Cell. 1993;73:347–360. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90234-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Expression of telomerase in conjunction with SV40 large T oncoprotein and an oncogenic allele of H-ras promotes tumorigenic conversion of normal human cells.

    “expression of telomerase in conjunction with expression of simian virus 40 large T oncoprotein and an oncogenic allele of H-ras has been shown to promote tumorigenic conversion of normal human cells (28).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] Hahn W C, Counter C M, Lundberg A S, Beijersbergen R L, Brooks M W, Weinberg R A. Nature (London) 1999;400:464–468. doi: 10.1038/22780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Late-stage neuroblastoma has high telomerase activity and correlates with a poor outcome.

    “whereas the late-stage disease has high telomerase activity and correlates with a poor outcome (6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Hiyama E, Hiyama K, Yokoyama T, Matsuura Y, Piatyszek M A, Shay J W. Nat Med. 1995;1:249–255. doi: 10.1038/nm0395-249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Results

    The decrease in measured TRF length may be an underestimate of the total loss of chromosomal DNA because the TRF assay does not monitor erosion of subtelomeric regions and because relatively little telomeric DNA remained to hybridize with radiolabeled probe.

    “This decrease in measured TRF length may be an underestimate of the total loss of chromosomal DNA, because the TRF assay does not monitor erosion of subtelomeric regions and because relatively little telomeric DNA remained to hybridize with radiolabeled probe.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Results

    The 2'-O-MeRNA inhibitor contained four phosphorothioate linkages, a chemical moiety noted for its propensity to produce misleading cellular effects that seem sequence-specific but are actually unrelated to binding to the intended target.

    “The 2′-O-MeRNA inhibitor contained four phosphorothioate linkages, a chemical moiety noted for its propensity to produce misleading cellular effects that seem sequence-specific but are actually unrelated to binding to the intended target (42).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] Stein C A. Antisense Res Dev. 1997;7:207–209. [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Abstract

    The lack of telomerase expression seems to curb growth of rapidly proliferating cells eventually, whereas an increase in telomerase permits indefinite proliferation.

    “Thus, the lack of telomerase expression seems to curb growth of rapidly proliferating cells eventually, whereas an increase in telomerase permits indefinite proliferation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Mutation of the RNA component of telomerase of Tetrahymena, Kluyveromyces lactis, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae leads to decreased cell proliferation.

    “Mutation of the RNA component of telomerase of Tetrahymena (20), Kluyveromyces lactis (21), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (22)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [20] Yu G-L, Bradley J D, Attardi L D, Blackburn E H. Nature (London) 1990;344:126–132. doi: 10.1038/344126a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] McEachern M J, Blackburn E H. Nature (London) 1995;376:403–409. doi: 10.1038/376403a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] Singer M S, Gottschling D E. Science. 1994;266:404–409. doi: 10.1126/science.7545955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    Although telomerase activity can confer extended life span to cells, other mechanisms may also exist.

    “Thus, although telomerase activity can confer extended life span to cells, other mechanisms may also exist.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Abstract

    Telomerase will be an unusually challenging target for drug development because of the long lag period expected before telomeres shorten sufficiently to produce detrimental effects on cell growth and because of the possibility of alternate mechanisms for maintenance of telomeres.

    “Telomerase will be an unusually challenging target for drug development because of the long lag period expected before telomeres would shorten sufficiently to produce detrimental effects on cell growth and because of the possibility of alternate mechanisms for maintenance of telomeres.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    Telomerase activity is correlated with pathologic stage.

    “other studies have suggested that telomerase activity is correlated with the pathologic stage (8–11)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [8] Albanell J, Lonardo F, Rusch V, Engelhardt M, Langenfeld J, Han W, Klimstra D, Venkatraman E, Moore M A S, Dmitrovsky E. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1609–1615. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.21.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] Tahara H, Kuniyasu H, Yokozaki H, Yasui W, Shay J W, Ide T, Tahara E. Clin Cancer Res. 1995;1:1245–1251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] Engelhardt M, Drullinsky P, Guillem J, Moore M A. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:1931–1941. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] Ohyashiki J H, Ohyashiki K, Iwama I, Hayashi S, Toyama K, Shay J W. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:619–625. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    In est1-deleted yeast, some rare survivors continue to proliferate through a recombination mechanism to maintain telomere length.

    “but some rare survivors continue to proliferate through a recombination mechanism to maintain telomere length.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] Lunblad V, Blackburn E H. Cell. 1993;73:347–360. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90234-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Abstract

    A few rare tumors and some experimentally immortalized cell lines lack detectable telomerase activity.

    “a few rare tumors (29) and some experimentally immortalized cell lines (30) lack detectable telomerase activity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [29] Gupta J, Han L P, Wang P, Bacchetti S. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1152–1157. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.16.1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [30] Bryan T M, Englezou A, Dalla-Pozza L, Dunham M A, Reddel R R. Nat Med. 1997;3:1271–1274. doi: 10.1038/nm1197-1271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Results

    Treatment of HME50-5E cells with 2'-O-MeRNA was repeated, and a similar decrease in proliferation was observed.

    “To confirm that the effects of inhibitor addition were reproducible, treatment of HME50-5E cells with 2′-O-MeRNA was repeated, and a similar decrease in proliferation was observed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Results

    Stringent precautions were taken to avoid contamination of cultured cells, and all experiments were completed successfully without interruption.

    “Because of the extreme length of these experiments, stringent precautions were taken to avoid contamination of cultured cells, and all experiments were completed successfully without interruption.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Recent work with PNAs introduced into cells by electroporation has shown decreased cell viability.

    “Recent work with PNAs introduced into cells by electroporation has shown decreased cell viability, supporting our findings (49).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [49] Shammas M A, Simmons C S, Corey D R, Shmookler-Reis R J. Oncogene. 1999;18:6191–6200. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion

    Inhibition of telomerase in normal stem cells may result in few side effects because the relatively short telomeres of tumors may erode to a critical length before irreversible harm is done to other cells.

    “This inhibition may result in few side effects, because the relatively short telomeres of tumors may erode to a critical length before irreversible harm is done to other cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning
    § Discussion

    Telomerase is an ideal target for oligonucleotides because its RNA template is essential for activity and is intrinsically accessible to binding by nucleic acids.

    “Telomerase is an ideal target for oligonucleotides, because its RNA template is essential for activity and is intrinsically accessible to binding by nucleic acids.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
      “The exposed RNA template of hTR makes telomerase an ideal target for oligonucleotides”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    2′-O-MeRNA and other 2′-O-alkyl-derivatized oligomers bind more tightly to complementary RNA sequences than do analogous DNA oligomers.

    “In addition, 2′-O-MeRNA and other 2′-O-alkyl-derivatized oligomers bind more tightly to complementary RNA sequences than do analogous DNA oligomers”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [45] Agrawal S, Jiang Z, Zhao Q, Shaw D, Cai Q, Roskey A, Channavajjala L, Saxinger C, Zhang R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:2620–2625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] Zhou W, Agrawal S. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1998;8:3269–3274. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00591-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given
    § Discussion

    Systemic administration of telomerase inhibitors will also inhibit telomerase in normal stem cells.

    “Systemic administration of telomerase inhibitors will also inhibit telomerase in normal stem cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Oligonucleotides are being tested in 13 ongoing clinical trials.

    “Oligonucleotides are being tested in 13 ongoing clinical trials (43)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [43] Hogrefe R I. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1999;9:351–357. doi: 10.1089/oli.1.1999.9.351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Non-sequence-selective effects may be at least partially implicated in results reported in 94% of the 2,026 studies published through 1997.

    “Tu et al. (47) have performed a comprehensive survey of the literature, leading Stein (48) to estimate that non-sequence-selective effects may be at least partially implicated in results reported in 94% of the 2,026 studies published through 1997.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47] Tu G C, Cao Q, Zhou F, Israel Y. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:25125–25131. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.39.25125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] Stein C A. Nat Biotechnol. 1999;17:209. doi: 10.1038/6909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    2′-O-MeRNA and other 2′-O-alkyl-derivatized oligomers have improved resistance to degradation by nucleases.

    “and have improved resistance to degradation by nucleases, reducing the need for phosphorothioate linkages and improving the selectivity of antisense effects (45, 46)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [45] Agrawal S, Jiang Z, Zhao Q, Shaw D, Cai Q, Roskey A, Channavajjala L, Saxinger C, Zhang R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:2620–2625. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.6.2620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] Zhou W, Agrawal S. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1998;8:3269–3274. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(98)00591-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Oligonucleotides that contain uniform phosphorothioate oligonucleotides inhibit telomerase in a non-sequence-specific fashion, presumably through binding to hTERT.

    “Indeed, we have previously observed that oligonucleotides that contain uniform phosphorothioate oligonucleotides inhibit telomerase in a non-sequence-specific fashion, presumably through binding to hTERT (38).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Pitts A E, Corey D R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:11549–11554. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion

    Fomivirsen has been approved for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis.

    “one oligonucleotide, Fomivirsen, has been approved for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis (44).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [44] Marwick C. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280:871. [Google Scholar] source

      Not checked in the free run.

31 of 31
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The mice used in these experiments possessed much longer telomeres than those found in cancerous human cells.

    “the mice used in these experiments possessed much longer telomeres than those found in cancerous human cells”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Chemically similar oligonucleotides are in clinical trials and have well characterized pharmacokinetics.

    “Chemically similar oligonucleotides are in clinical trials and have well characterized pharmacokinetics”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    HME50-5E cells were derived from HME50 preimmortal cells that had one mutant p53 allele and lost the second allele during spontaneous immortalization.

    “HME50-5E cells were derived from HME50 preimmortal cells that had one mutant p53 allele and lost the second allele during spontaneous immortalization”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DU145 cells have two mutant p53 alleles.

    “whereas DU145 cells have two mutant alleles”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The genetic background of HME50-hTERT cells is similar to that of HME50-5E cells.

    “even though the genetic background of HME50-hTERT cells is similar to that of HME50-5E cells”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    HME50-5E cells have shorter telomeres than DU145 cells.

    “which have shorter telomeres than DU145 cells”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    HME50-hTERT cells have an initial telomere length approximately 4,000 bp longer than that of HME50-5E cells.

    “their initial telomere length of HME50-hTERT cells is approximately 4,000 bp longer.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Induction of ALT has never been reported in previous publications using other means of telomerase inhibition.

    “Induction of ALT has also never been reported in previous publications using other means of telomerase inhibition (Hahn et al., 1999b;Herbert et al., 1999;Zhang et al., 1999).”

    From A highly selective telomerase inhibitor limiting human cancer cell proliferation (2001) · cites this paper as Herbert et al., 1999

  • Reported telomerase inhibition strategies include peptide nucleic acids and 2'-O-MeRNA oligonucleotides against the telomerase RNA template, telomeric DNA binders such as cationic porphyrins or anthraquinones, and nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

    “Several strategies to inhibit telomerase activity have been reported.These include peptide nucleic acids and 2¢-O-MeRNA oligonucleotides directed towards the telomerase RNA template (Herbert et al., 1999), compounds that target telomeric DNA such as cationic porphyrins or anthraquinones (Sun et al., 1997) and nucleosidic reverse transcriptase inhibitors (Strahl and Blackburn, 1996).”

    From A highly selective telomerase inhibitor limiting human cancer cell proliferation (2001) · cites this paper as Herbert et al., 1999

  • Unlike earlier anti-sense oligonucleotide or dominant-negative hTERT studies, inhibitor-treated cells showed no evidence of increased apoptosis.

    “In contrast to previous results employing anti-sense oligonucleotides or the expression of dominant-negative hTERT alleles (Hahn et al., 1999b;Herbert et al., 1999;Zhang et al., 1999) we saw no evidence for an increased rate of apoptosis in the inhibitor-treated cells.”

    From A highly selective telomerase inhibitor limiting human cancer cell proliferation (2001) · cites this paper as Herbert et al., 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. H Tahara, H Kuniyasu, H Yokozaki, W Yasui, J W Shay, T Ide, E Tahara Clin Cancer Res 1, 1245–1251 (1995).
  2. M Engelhardt, P Drullinsky, J Guillem, M A Moore Clin Cancer Res 3, 1931–1941 (1997).
  3. J H Ohyashiki, K Ohyashiki, I Iwama, S Hayashi, K Toyama, J W Shay Clin Cancer Res 3, 619–625 (1997).
  4. J W Shay, D Brasiskyte, M Ouellette, M A Piatyszek, H Werbin, Y Ying, W E Wright Methods Mol Genet 5, 263–268 (1994).
  5. C A Stein Antisense Res Dev 7, 207–209 (1997).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herbert, B.-S., Pitts, A. E., Baker, S. I., Hamilton, S. E., Wright, W. E., Shay, J. W., & Corey, D. R.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1999-12-07
Volume
96
Issue
25
Pages
14276-14281
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2118228848
Cited by
539
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 13
FWCI
27.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (CA 74908, R01CA074908, CA-85143)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007062, T32GM07062-23)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
telomerase inhibition, telomere shortening, apoptosis, peptide nucleic acid, 2'-O-methyl RNA, breast epithelial cells, cell immortalization, anticancer drug targets
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Division, Enzyme Inhibitors, Humans, Oligonucleotides, Telomere, Cell Death, Telomerase, Peptide Nucleic Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review