Cited by 764Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics

Hayflick, his limit, and cellular ageing

Shay, Jerry W., Wright, Woodring E.·2000·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Abstract

Almost 40 years ago, Leonard Hayflick discovered that cultured normal human cells have limited capacity to divide, after which they become senescent -- a phenomenon now known as the 'Hayflick limit'. Hayflick's findings were strongly challenged at the time, and continue to be questioned in a few circles, but his achievements have enabled others to make considerable progress towards understanding and manipulating the molecular mechanisms of ageing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/35036093

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Finite cell lines undergo a programmed process of biological 'ageing' and eventually cease replication and enter a state of senescence.

    “Finite cell lines are cultures of cells that can be sub-cultured many times but undergo a programmed process of biological 'ageing' (Campisi and di Fagagna, 2007) and eventually cease replication and enter a state of senescence (Shay and Wright, 2000; Swim and Parker, 1957).”

    From Guidance document on Good cell and tissue culture practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0) (2021) · cites this paper as Shay and Wright, 2000

  • Proliferating cells reach the Hayflick limit largely because repeated DNA replication in the absence of telomerase causes telomeres to progressively shorten and eventually malfunction.

    “Over the ensuing decades, it was discovered that proliferating cells reach the so-called Hayflick limit largely because repeated DNA replication in the absence of telomerase causes telomeres to progressively shorten and eventually malfunction (Shay and Wright, 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shay, J. W., & Wright, W. E.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Shay, Jerry W.
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Published
2000-10
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
72-76
ISSN
  • 1471-0072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0080
OpenAlex
W1517051009
Cited by
764
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
Keywords
Hayflick limit, cellular senescence, cellular aging, replicative lifespan, human cell culture
MeSH terms
Aging, Cell Division, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Time Factors, United States, Telomere, Cellular Senescence, Telomerase, History, 19th Century, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review