Cited by 113Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCellular transport and secretionDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Structure-dependent Impairment of Intracellular Apolipoprotein E4 Trafficking and Its Detrimental Effects Are Rescued by Small-molecule Structure Correctors

Open access
Brodbeck, Jens, McGuire, Jim, Liu, Zhaoping, Meyer-Franke, Anke, Balestra, Maureen E., Jeong, Dah-eun, Pleiss, Mike, McComas, Casey +11 more·2011·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Apolipoprotein (apo) E4 is the major genetic risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD) and likely contributes to neuropathology through various pathways. Here we report that the intracellular trafficking of apoE4 is impaired in Neuro-2a cells and primary neurons, as shown by measuring fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. In Neuro-2a cells, more apoE4 than apoE3 molecules remained immobilized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi apparatus, and the lateral motility of apoE4 was significantly lower in the Golgi apparatus (but not in the ER) than that of apoE3. Likewise, the immobile fraction was larger, and the lateral motility was lower for apoE4 than apoE3 in mouse primary hippocampal neurons. ApoE4 with the R61T mutation, which abolishes apoE4 domain interaction, was less immobilized, and its lateral motility was comparable with that of apoE3. The trafficking impairment of apoE4 was also rescued by disrupting domain interaction with the small-molecule structure correctors GIND25 and PH002. PH002 also rescued apoE4-induced impairments of neurite outgrowth in Neuro-2a cells and dendritic spine development in primary neurons. ApoE4 did not affect trafficking of amyloid precursor protein, another AD-related protein, through the secretory pathway. Thus, domain interaction renders more newly synthesized apoE4 molecules immobile and slows their trafficking along the secretory pathway. Correcting the pathological structure of apoE4 by disrupting domain interaction is a potential therapeutic approach to treat or prevent AD related to apoE4.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m110.217380

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Small molecules that disrupt the interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains of ApoE4, called structure correctors, have been tested and make ApoE4 less prone to fragmentation.

    “In this regard, small molecules that disrupt the interaction between the N- and C-terminal domains of ApoE4 protein, also called “structure correctors”, have been tested in such a way that ApoE4 becomes less prone to fragmentation [85].”

    From Apoe4 and Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis—Mitochondrial Deregulation and Targeted Therapeutic Strategies (2023) · cites this paper as [85]

    The Results section reports testing the structure correctors GIND25 and PH002, which disrupt apoE4 domain interaction, and finding that they rescued impaired intracellular trafficking. The Discussion says apoE4 proteolysis is domain-interaction-dependent, but this paper does not report testing whether the compounds make apoE4 less prone to fragmentation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • NSE-apoE4 mice have impairments in learning and memory and a loss of dendritic spines in primary neurons and in the hippocampus and cortex.

    “These mice have impairments in learning and memory [50], as well as a loss of dendritic spines in primary neurons and in the hippocampus and cortex [21].”

    From Arf4 Determines Dentate Gyrus-Mediated Pattern Separation by Regulating Dendritic Spine Development (2012) · cites this paper as [21]

    The dendritic-spine Results section (page not provided) reports significantly lower spine density in primary hippocampal neurons cultured from NSE-apoE4 mice than from NSE-apoE3 mice. It also refers to spine loss in the brains of transgenic mice, but does not specify loss in the hippocampus and cortex in vivo. The learning-and-memory clause is attached to a different citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The dendritic spine density of NSE-apoE4 neurons was significantly less than that of either NSE-apoE3 or WT neurons.

    “Consistent with previous findings [21], the dendritic spine density of NSE-apoE4 neurons (Figs. 12E and E′) was significantly less than that of either NSE-apoE3 (Figs. 12D and D′) or WT neurons (Figs. 12C and C′).”

    From Arf4 Determines Dentate Gyrus-Mediated Pattern Separation by Regulating Dendritic Spine Development (2012) · cites this paper as [21]

    The dendritic-spine development Results section reports significantly lower spine density in hippocampal neurons from NSE-apoE4 mice than in those from NSE-apoE3 mice (Fig. 11). The study does not report a dendritic-spine comparison with WT neurons, so that part of the attributed claim is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Multiple small molecules have been designed to correct the conformation of APOE4 so that it resembles that of APOE3 or APOE2.

    “Multiple small molecules have been designed to ‘correct’ the conformation of APOE4 so that it resembles that of APOE3 or APOE2 (refs. 213–217)”

    From Multifaceted roles of APOE in Alzheimer disease (2024) · cites this paper as [213]

  • In neurons, apoE4 is associated with neurotoxicity.

    “and neurotoxicity [10, 17–19, 34, 35]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Corder, E. H., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D. E., Gaskell, P. C., Small, G. W., Roses, A. D., Haines, J. L., and Pericak-Vance, M. A. (1993) Science 261, 921-923
  2. Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D., George-Hyslop, P. H., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Joo, S. H., Rosi, B. L., Gusella, J. F., Crapper-Ma- cLachlan, D. R., Alberts, M. J., Hulette, C., Crain, B., Goldgaber, D., and Roses, A. D. (1993) Neurology 43, 1467-1472
  3. Strittmatter, W. J., Saunders, A. M., Schmechel, D., Pericak-Vance, M., Enghild, J., Salvesen, G. S., and Roses, A. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  4. Raffai, R. L., Dong, L. M., Farese, R. V., Jr., and Weisgraber, K. H. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 11587-11591
  5. Mahley, R. W., Weisgraber, K. H., and Huang, Y. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 5644 -5651
  6. Elshourbagy, N. A., Liao, W. S., Mahley, R. W., and Taylor, J. M. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 203-207
  7. Brodbeck, J., Balestra, M. E., Saunders, A. M., Roses, A. D., Mahley, R. W., and Huang, Y. (2008) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 1343-1346
  8. Chang, S., ran Ma, T., Miranda, R. D., Balestra, M. E., Mahley, R. W., and Huang, Y. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 18694 -18699
  9. Ye, S., Huang, Y., Mu ¨llendorff, K., Dong, L., Giedt, G., Meng, E. C., Cohen, F. E., Kuntz, I. D., Weisgraber, K. H., and Mahley, R. W. (2005) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 18700 -18705
  10. Holtzman, D. M., Pitas, R. E., Kilbridge, J., Nathan, B., Mahley, R. W., Bu, G., and Schwartz, A. L. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 9480 -9484
  11. Huang, Y., Liu, X. Q., Wyss-Coray, T., Brecht, W. J., Sanan, D. A., and Mahley, R. W. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 8838 -8843
  12. Harris, F. M., Brecht, W. J., Xu, Q., Tesseur, I., Kekonius, L., Wyss-Coray, T., Fish, J. D., Masliah, E., Hopkins, P. C., Scearce-Levie, K., Weisgraber, K. H., Mucke, L., Mahley, R. W., and Huang, Y. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  13. Nehls, S., Snapp, E. L., Cole, N. B., Zaal, K. J., Kenworthy, A. K., Roberts, T. H., Ellenberg, J., Presley, J. F., Siggia, E., and Lippincott-Schwartz, J. (2000) Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 288 -295

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brodbeck, J., McGuire, J., Liu, Z., Meyer-Franke, A., Balestra, M. E., Jeong, D.-E., Pleiss, M., McComas, C., Hess, F., Witter, D., Peterson, S., Childers, M., Goulet, M., Liverton, N., Hargreaves, R., Freedman, S., Weisgraber, K. H., Mahley, R. W., & Huang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Gladstone Institutes (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Yadong
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-05
Volume
286
Issue
19
Pages
17217-17226
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143802939
Cited by
113
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (AG‐022074)
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG022074)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
APOE ε4, apolipoprotein E3, intracellular trafficking, Alzheimer's disease, endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, protein immobilization, domain interactions, neurite outgrowth, dendritic spine development, amyloid precursor protein, secretory pathway, FRAP
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Biological Transport, Cell Line, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Golgi Apparatus, Hippocampus, Humans, Models, Biological, Mutation, Neurons, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review