Cited by 176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

β-Secretase Processing in the Trans-Golgi Network Preferentially Generates Truncated Amyloid Species That Accumulate in Alzheimer’s Disease Brain

Huse, Jason T., Liu, Kangning, Pijak, Donald S., Carlin, Dan, Lee, Virginia M.-Y., Doms, Robert W.·2002·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

The amyloid beta (A beta) peptide that accumulates in Alzheimer's disease brain is derived from the proteolytic processing of the amyloid precursor protein by beta- and gamma-secretase activities. The beta-secretase enzyme beta-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme (BACE) generates the N terminus of A beta by cleavage at either Asp(1) (beta-site) or Glu(11) (beta'-site), ultimately leading to the production of full-length A beta 1-40/42 or truncated A beta 11-40/42. The functional significance of this variable cleavage site specificity as well as the relative pathological impact of full-length versus N-terminally truncated A beta remains largely unknown. In our analysis of BACE reactivity in cell culture, we found that the preference of the protease for either beta- or beta'-cleavage was strongly dependent on intracellular localization. Within the endoplasmic reticulum, beta-site proteolysis predominated, whereas in the trans-Golgi network, beta'-cleavage was favored. Furthermore, the contrasting cleavage site specificities of BACE were not simply due to differences in organelle pH or the oligosaccharide composition of the glycoproteins involved. Examination of post-mortem brain specimens revealed significant levels of A beta 11-40/42 within insoluble amyloid pools. Taken together, these data support an important role for beta'-cleavage in the process of cerebral amyloid deposition and localize the processing event to the trans-Golgi network.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m111141200

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Glenner, 1984, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 120, 885, 10.1016/S0006-291X(84)80190-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Masters, 1985, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 82, 4245, 10.1073/pnas.82.12.4245 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Selkoe, 1999, Nature, 399, A23, 10.1038/399a023 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hussain, 1999, Mol. Cell. Neurosci., 14, 419, 10.1006/mcne.1999.0811 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Sinha, 1999, Nature, 402, 537, 10.1038/990114 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Yan, 1999, Nature, 402, 533, 10.1038/990107 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lin, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 1456, 10.1073/pnas.97.4.1456 · DOI
  8. Esch, 1990, Science, 248, 1122, 10.1126/science.2111583 · DOI
  9. Guiroy, 1987, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 84, 2073, 10.1073/pnas.84.7.2073 · DOI
  10. Roher, 1993, J. Biol. Chem., 268, 3072, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53661-9 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Pike, 1995, J. Biol. Chem., 270, 23895, 10.1074/jbc.270.41.23895 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Farzan, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 9712, 10.1073/pnas.160115697 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Creemers, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 4211, 10.1074/jbc.M006947200 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Xu, 1998, J. Neurochem., 71, 1920, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71051920.x · DOI
  15. Cai, 2001, Nat. Neurosci., 4, 233, 10.1038/85064 · DOI
  16. Naslund, 1994, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 91, 8378, 10.1073/pnas.91.18.8378 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Huse, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 33729, 10.1074/jbc.M004175200 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Walter, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 14634, 10.1074/jbc.M011116200 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Capell, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 30849, 10.1074/jbc.M003202200 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Haniu, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 21099, 10.1074/jbc.M002095200 · DOI
  21. Cook, 1997, Nat. Med., 3, 1021, 10.1038/nm0997-1021 · DOI
  22. Suzuki, 1994, Science, 264, 1336, 10.1126/science.8191290 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Asami-Okada, 1995, Biochemistry, 34, 10272, 10.1021/bi00032a022 · DOI
  24. Bosshart, 1994, J. Cell Biol., 126, 1157, 10.1083/jcb.126.5.1157 · DOI
  25. Liu, 2002, Biochemistry, 41, 3128, 10.1021/bi015800g · DOI · Paper page
  26. Roher, 1993, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 90, 10836, 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10836 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Klausner, 1992, J. Cell Biol., 116, 1071, 10.1083/jcb.116.5.1071 · DOI
  28. Mollenhauer, 1990, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1031, 225, 10.1016/0304-4157(90)90008-Z · DOI
  29. Demaurex, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 2044, 10.1074/jbc.273.4.2044 · DOI
  30. Helenius, 2001, Science, 291, 2364, 10.1126/science.291.5512.2364 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Luo, 2001, Nat. Neurosci., 4, 231, 10.1038/85059 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Shi, 2001, J. Biol. Chem., 276, 10366, 10.1074/jbc.M009200200 · DOI
  33. Capell, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 3205, 10.1074/jbc.273.6.3205 · DOI
  34. Yu, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 16470, 10.1074/jbc.273.26.16470 · DOI
  35. Li, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 6138, 10.1073/pnas.110126897 · DOI
  36. Yu, 2000, Nature, 407, 48, 10.1038/35024009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Huse, J. T., Liu, K., Pijak, D. S., Carlin, D., Lee, V. M.-Y., & Doms, R. W.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-05
Volume
277
Issue
18
Pages
16278-16284
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
176
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review