Cited by 124

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Expression of ABCG1, but Not ABCA1, Correlates with Cholesterol Release by Cerebellar Astroglia

Karten, Barbara, Campenot, Robert B., Vance, Dennis E., Vance, Jean E.·2006·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m508915200

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Treatment of astrocytes with LXR agonists upregulates expression of ABCA1 and ABCG1, promoting expression and secretion of ApoE from astrocytes.

    “Treatment of astrocytes with LXR agonists has been previously reported to upregulate the expression of ABCA1 and ABCG1, promoting the expression and secretion of ApoE from astrocytes (63, 64).”

    From Lipidome and proteome of astrocyte and microglia ApoE lipoprotein reveal differences based on cell type and ApoE isoform (2026) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Abstract reports that the LXR agonist TO901317 upregulated ABCA1 and ABCG1 in cultured cerebellar murine astroglia. The section on cholesterol efflux to exogenous ApoA1 reports increased apoE secretion after treatment, but the passages do not establish increased apoE expression or show that transporter upregulation caused the secretion increase. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Dietschy, 2001, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 12, 105, 10.1097/00041433-200104000-00003 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Turley, 1996, J. Lipid Res., 37, 1953, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)37560-X · DOI
  3. Lutjohann, 1996, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 93, 9799, 10.1073/pnas.93.18.9799 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Patel, 1995, Neuroreport, 6, 653, 10.1097/00001756-199503000-00017 · DOI
  5. Koch, 2001, J. Lipid Res., 42, 1143, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)31605-9 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ullian, 2001, Science, 291, 657, 10.1126/science.291.5504.657 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Mauch, 2001, Science, 294, 1354, 10.1126/science.294.5545.1354 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Nagler, 2001, J. Physiol., 533, 665, 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.00665.x · DOI
  9. Hayashi, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 14009, 10.1074/jbc.M313828200 · DOI
  10. Mahley, 1988, Science, 240, 622, 10.1126/science.3283935 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Vance, 2005, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 16, 193, 10.1016/j.semcdb.2005.01.005 · DOI
  12. Pitas, 1987, J. Biol. Chem., 262, 14352, 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)47945-8 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mockel, 1994, J. Neurochem., 62, 788, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.62020788.x · DOI
  14. Panzenboeck, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 42781, 10.1074/jbc.M207601200 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Oram, 2001, J. Lipid Res., 42, 1173, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)31566-2 · DOI
  16. Schmitz, 2001, J. Lipid Res., 42, 1513, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)32205-7 · DOI
  17. Ito, 2003, Drug News Perspect, 16, 490, 10.1358/dnp.2003.16.8.829346 · DOI
  18. Wang, 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 101, 9774, 10.1073/pnas.0403506101 · DOI
  19. Nakamura, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 45980, 10.1074/jbc.M408652200 · DOI
  20. Kennedy, 2005, Cell Metab., 1, 121, 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.01.002 · DOI
  21. Hirsch-Reinshagen, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 41197, 10.1074/jbc.M407962200 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wahrle, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 40987, 10.1074/jbc.M407963200 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Oram, 2003, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 23, 720, 10.1161/01.ATV.0000054662.44688.9A · DOI
  24. Lee, 2005, Curr. Opin. Lipidol., 16, 19, 10.1097/00041433-200502000-00005 · DOI
  25. Remaley, 2001, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 280, 818, 10.1006/bbrc.2000.4219 · DOI
  26. Krimbou, 2004, J. Lipid Res., 45, 839, 10.1194/jlr.M300418-JLR200 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Karten, 2005, Biochem. J., 387, 779, 10.1042/BJ20041694 · DOI
  28. Langmann, 1999, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 257, 29, 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0406 · DOI
  29. Klucken, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 817, 10.1073/pnas.97.2.817 · DOI
  30. Schwartz, 2000, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 274, 794, 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3243 · DOI
  31. Costet, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 28240, 10.1074/jbc.M003337200 · DOI
  32. Venkateswaran, 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 97, 12097, 10.1073/pnas.200367697 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Sparrow, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 10021, 10.1074/jbc.M108225200 · DOI
  34. Langmann, 2003, Clin. Chem., 49, 230, 10.1373/49.2.230 · DOI
  35. Choi, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 32569, 10.1074/jbc.M304553200 · DOI
  36. Stitt, 1991, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 633, 113, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb15602.x · DOI
  37. Yamada, 2002, Anat. Sci. Int., 77, 94, 10.1046/j.0022-7722.2002.00021.x · DOI
  38. Lordkipanidze, 2005, Glia, 51, 229, 10.1002/glia.20200 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Karten, B., Campenot, R. B., Vance, D. E., & Vance, J. E.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
281
Issue
7
Pages
4049-4057
ISSN
0021-9258
Cited by
124
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review