CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural analysis of the LDL receptor-interacting FERM domain in the E3 ubiquitin ligase IDOL reveals an obscured substrate-binding site

Martinelli, Luca, Adamopoulos, Athanassios, Johansson, Patrik, Wan, Paul T., Gunnarsson, Jenny, Guo, Hongwei, Boyd, Helen, Zelcer, Noam, Sixma, Titia K.·2020·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.ra120.014349PMC PMC7521653
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.ra120.014349

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Brown, 1986, A receptor-mediated pathway for cholesterol homeostasis, Science, 232, 34, 10.1126/science.3513311 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baigent, 2010, Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials, Lancet, 376, 1670, 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Yokoyama, 1993, SREBP-1, a basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper protein that controls transcription of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene, Cell, 75, 187, 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80095-9 · DOI
  4. Hua, 1993, SREBP-2, a second basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine zipper protein that stimulates transcription by binding to a sterol regulatory element, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 90, 11603, 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11603 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Goldstein, 2006, Protein sensors for membrane sterols, Cell, 124, 35, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.022 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Sorrentino, 2012, Post-transcriptional regulation of lipoprotein receptors by the E3-ubiquitin ligase inducible degrader of the low-density lipoprotein receptor, Curr. Opin. Lipidol, 23, 213, 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283532947 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Abifadel, 2003, Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia, Nat. Genet., 34, 154, 10.1038/ng1161 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lagace, 2006, Secreted PCSK9 decreases the number of LDL receptors in hepatocytes and in livers of parabiotic mice, J. Clin. Invest., 116, 2995, 10.1172/JCI29383 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Seidah, 2014, PCSK9: a key modulator of cardiovascular health, Circ. Res., 114, 1022, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.301621 · DOI
  10. Zelcer, 2009, LXR regulates cholesterol uptake through Idol-dependent ubiquitination of the LDL receptor, Science, 325, 100, 10.1126/science.1168974 · DOI · Paper page
  11. van Loon, 2019, The E3 ubiquitin ligase inducible degrader of the LDL receptor/myosin light chain interacting protein in health and disease, Curr. Opin. Lipidol, 30, 192, 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000593 · DOI
  12. Yonemura, 1998, Ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins bind to a positively charged amino acid cluster in the juxta-membrane cytoplasmic domain of CD44, CD43, and ICAM-2, J. Cell Biol., 140, 885, 10.1083/jcb.140.4.885 · DOI
  13. Mangeat, 1999, ERM proteins in cell adhesion and membrane dynamics, Trends Cell Biol., 9, 187, 10.1016/S0962-8924(99)01544-5 · DOI
  14. Zhang, 2011, The IDOL-UBE2D complex mediates sterol-dependent degradation of the LDL receptor, Genes Dev, 25, 1262, 10.1101/gad.2056211 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wang, 2012, Molecular characterization of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9-mediated degradation of the LDLR, J. Lipid Res., 53, 1932, 10.1194/jlr.M028563 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Teslovich, 2010, Biological, clinical and population relevance of 95 loci for blood lipids, Nature, 466, 707, 10.1038/nature09270 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Sorrentino, 2013, Identification of a loss-of-function inducible degrader of the low-density lipoprotein receptor variant in individuals with low circulating low-density lipoprotein, Eur. Heart J, 34, 1292, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs472 · DOI
  18. Van Loon, 2016, Idolizing the clearance of amyloid-β by microglia, Ann. Transl. Med., 4, 536, 10.21037/atm.2016.11.63 · DOI
  19. van Loon, 2018, Inactivation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase IDOL attenuates diet-induced obesity and metabolic dysfunction in mice, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., 38, 1785, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311168 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Calkin, 2011, FERM-dependent E3 ligase recognition is a conserved mechanism for targeted degradation of lipoprotein receptors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108, 20107, 10.1073/pnas.1111589108 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Zulauf, 1992, Light scattering of proteins as a criterion for crystallization, J. Cryst. Growth, 122, 102, 10.1016/0022-0248(92)90232-8 · DOI
  22. Emsley, 2010, Features and development of Coot, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 486, 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Winn, 2001, Use of TLS parameters to model anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 57, 122, 10.1107/S0907444900014736 · DOI
  24. Hajizadeh, 2018, Consensus Bayesian assessment of protein molecular mass from solution X-ray scattering data, Sci. Rep., 8, 7204, 10.1038/s41598-018-25355-2 · DOI
  25. Konarev, 2003, PRIMUS: a Windows PC-based system for small-angle scattering data analysis, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 36, 1277, 10.1107/S0021889803012779 · DOI
  26. Hamada, 2000, Structural basis of the membrane-targeting and unmasking mechanisms of the radixin FERM domain, EMBO J, 19, 4449, 10.1093/emboj/19.17.4449 · DOI
  27. Krissinel, 2004, Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 60, 2256, 10.1107/S0907444904026460 · DOI
  28. Edwards, 2001, The 2.7 Å crystal structure of the activated FERM domain of moesin: an analysis of structural changes on activation, Biochemistry, 40, 7061, 10.1021/bi010419h · DOI
  29. Shimizu, 2002, Structural basis for neurofibromatosis type 2. Crystal structure of the merlin FERM domain, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 10332, 10.1074/jbc.M109979200 · DOI
  30. Chinthalapudi, 2018, Lipid binding promotes the open conformation and tumor-suppressive activity of neurofibromin 2, Nat. Commun., 9, 1338, 10.1038/s41467-018-03648-4 · DOI
  31. Hamada, 2003, Structural basis of adhesion-molecule recognition by ERM proteins revealed by the crystal structure of the radixin-ICAM-2 complex, EMBO J, 22, 502, 10.1093/emboj/cdg039 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Takai, 2008, Structural basis of the cytoplasmic tail of adhesion molecule CD43 and its binding to ERM proteins, J. Mol. Biol., 381, 634, 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.05.085 · DOI
  33. Rambo, 2011, Characterizing flexible and intrinsically unstructured biological macromolecules by SAS using the Porod-Debye law, Biopolymers, 95, 559, 10.1002/bip.21638 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Busam, 2011, Structural basis of tumor suppressor in lung cancer 1 (TSLC1) binding to differentially expressed in adenocarcinoma of the lung (DAL-1/4.1B), J. Biol. Chem., 286, 4511, 10.1074/jbc.M110.174011 · DOI
  35. Mori, 2008, Structural basis for CD44 recognition by ERM proteins, J. Biol. Chem., 283, 29602, 10.1074/jbc.M803606200 · DOI
  36. Ghai, 2013, Structural basis for endosomal trafficking of diverse transmembrane cargos by PX-FERM proteins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110, E643, 10.1073/pnas.1216229110 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Stiegler, 2014, Structural determinants for binding of sorting nexin 17 (SNX17) to the cytoplasmic adaptor protein Krev interaction trapped 1 (KRIT1), J. Biol. Chem., 289, 25362, 10.1074/jbc.M114.584011 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Luna-Vargas, 2011, Enabling high-throughput ligation-independent cloning and protein expression for the family of ubiquitin specific proteases, J. Struct. Biol., 175, 113, 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.03.017 · DOI
  39. Mori, 2007, Crystallographic characterization of the radixin FERM domain bound to the cytoplasmic tail of adhesion molecule CD44, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. F Struct. Biol. Cryst. Commun., 63, 844, 10.1107/S1744309107041152 · DOI
  40. Mattiroli, 2012, RNF168 ubiquitinates K13-15 on H2A/H2AX to drive DNA damage signaling, Cell, 150, 1182, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.005 · DOI
  41. Bowler, 2015, MASSIF-1: a beamline dedicated to the fully automatic characterization and data collection from crystals of biological macromolecules, J. Synchrotron Radiat, 22, 1540, 10.1107/S1600577515016604 · DOI
  42. Svensson, 2015, Fully automatic characterization and data collection from crystals of biological macromolecules, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 71, 1757, 10.1107/S1399004715011918 · DOI
  43. Kabsch, 2010, XDS, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 125, 10.1107/S0907444909047337 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Keegan, 2007, Automated search-model discovery and preparation for structure solution by molecular replacement, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 63, 447, 10.1107/S0907444907002661 · DOI
  45. Winn, 2011, Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 67, 235, 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Joosten, 2014, The PDB_REDO server for macromolecular structure model optimization, IUCrJ, 1, 213, 10.1107/S2052252514009324 · DOI
  47. Chen, 2010, MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 12, 10.1107/S0907444909042073 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Krissinel, 2007, Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state, J. Mol. Biol., 372, 774, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.05.022 · DOI
  49. Battye, 2011, iMOSFLM: a new graphical interface for diffraction-image processing with MOSFLM, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 67, 271, 10.1107/S0907444910048675 · DOI
  50. Evans, 2006, Scaling and assessment of data quality, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 62, 72, 10.1107/S0907444905036693 · DOI
  51. McCoy, 2007, Phaser crystallographic software, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 40, 658, 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Mosca, 2008, RAPIDO: a web server for the alignment of protein structures in the presence of conformational changes, Nucleic Acids Res., 36, W42, 10.1093/nar/gkn197 · DOI
  53. Franke, 2017, ATSAS 2.8: a comprehensive data analysis suite for small-angle scattering from macromolecular solutions, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 50, 1212, 10.1107/S1600576717007786 · DOI
  54. Konarev, 2015, A posteriori determination of the useful data range for small-angle scattering experiments on dilute monodisperse systems, IUCrJ, 2, 352, 10.1107/S2052252515005163 · DOI
  55. Petoukhov, 2015, Ambiguity assessment of small-angle scattering curves from monodisperse systems, Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr., 71, 1051, 10.1107/S1399004715002576 · DOI
  56. Guinier, 1939, La diffraction des rayons X aux très petits angles: application à l'étude de phénomènes ultramicroscopiques, Ann. Phys, 11, 161, 10.1051/anphys/193911120161 · DOI
  57. Svergun, 1992, Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 25, 495, 10.1107/S0021889892001663 · DOI
  58. Svergun, 1995, CRYSOL—a program to evaluate X-ray solution scattering of biological macromolecules from atomic coordinates, J. Appl. Crystallogr., 28, 768, 10.1107/S0021889895007047 · DOI
  59. Panjkovich, 2016, Deciphering conformational transitions of proteins by small angle X-ray scattering and normal mode analysis, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys, 18, 5707, 10.1039/C5CP04540A · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martinelli, L., Adamopoulos, A., Johansson, P., Wan, P. T., Gunnarsson, J., Guo, H., Boyd, H., Zelcer, N., & Sixma, T. K.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
295
Issue
39
Pages
13570-13583
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.ra120.014349
PMC
PMC7521653
Cited by
14
References
9
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • EC | FP7 | FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (617376, 862537)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (714.014.002, 016.176.643)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review