Cited by 423Nutritional Studies and DietStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Statistical approaches for assessing the relative validity of a food-frequency questionnaire: use of correlation coefficients and the kappa statistic

Open access
Masson, LF, MCNeill, G, Tomany, JO, Simpson, JA, Peace, HS, Wei, L, Grubb, DA, Bolton-Smith, C·2003·Public Health Nutrition

Abstract

Objective: To compare different statistical methods for assessing the relative validity of a self-administered, 150-item, semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) with 4-day weighed diet records (WR). Design: Subjects completed the Scottish Collaborative Group FFQ and carried out a 4-day WR. Relative agreement between the FFQ and WR for energy-adjusted nutrient intakes was assessed by Pearson and Spearman rank correlation coefficients, the percentages of subjects classified into the same and opposite thirds of intake, and Cohen's weighted kappa. Subjects: Forty-one men, mean age 36 (range 21-56) years, and 40 women, mean age 33 (range 19-58) years, recruited from different locations in Aberdeen, Scotland. Results: Spearman correlation coefficients tended to be lower than Pearson correlation coefficients, and were above 0.5 for 10 of the 27 nutrients in men and 17 of the 27 nutrients in women. For nutrients with Spearman correlation coefficients above 0.5, the percentage of subjects correctly classified into thirds ranged from 39 to 78%, and weighted kappa values ranged from 0.23 to 0.66. Conclusions: Both Spearman correlation coefficients and weighted kappa values are useful in assessing the relative validity of estimates of nutrient intake by FFQs. Spearman correlation coefficients above 0.5, more than 50% of subjects correctly classified and less than 10% of subjects grossly misclassified into thirds, and weighted kappa values above 0.4 are recommended for nutrients of interest in epidemiological studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1079/phn2002429

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Holland B, Welch AA, Unwin ID, Buss DH, Paul AA, Southgate DAT. McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1991.
  2. Holland B, Welch AA, Buss DH. Vegetable Dishes. Second Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1992.
  3. Chan W, Brown J, Church SM, Buss DH. Meat Products and Dishes. Sixth Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Masson, L., MCNeill, G., Tomany, J., Simpson, J., Peace, H., Wei, L., Grubb, D., & Bolton-Smith, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • MRC Elsie Widdowson Laboratory (GB)
Corresponding author
MCNeill, G
Venue
Public Health Nutrition
Published
2003-06
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
313-321
ISSN
  • 1368-9800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2727
OpenAlex
W2001170097
Cited by
423
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
FWCI
10.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
food frequency questionnaire, questionnaire validity, nutrient intake assessment, Spearman correlation, Pearson correlation, weighted kappa, dietary assessment agreement
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet Surveys, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Scotland, Sex Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Nutrition Assessment, Diet Records, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review