Cited by 16Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumDental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques

Prevalence of blood and injection phobia among pregnant women

LILLIECREUTZ, CAROLINE, JOSEFSSON, ANN·2008·Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of blood and injection phobia in an unselected pregnant population, in order to estimate the need for curative intervention programmes. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: Antenatal care clinics in the southeast region of Sweden. Sample. In total, 1,606 consecutively registered pregnant women attending their first visit with a midwife. METHODS: The women were asked to complete the Injection Phobia-Anxiety scale, measuring phobic symptoms. Women who scored>20 on the questionnaire were telephone-interviewed and then diagnosed or dismissed according to the DSM-IV criteria for blood and injection phobia. Main outcome measures. Prevalence of blood and injection phobia according to the DSM-IV. RESULTS: Of 1,529 women who chose to participate (92.5%), 110 women or 7.2% fulfilled the DSM-IV criteria for blood and injection phobia. The mean age of the women was 29.1 years. CONCLUSIONS: Blood and injection phobia is hitherto unreported in the literature, but seems to be relatively common and needs to be recognized during pregnancy as it causes a great deal of discomfort and fear among pregnant women. The Injection Phobia-Anxiety scale is suitable as a screening tool in an antenatal care clinic setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00016340802468324

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LILLIECREUTZ, C., & JOSEFSSON, A.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
JOSEFSSON, ANN
Venue
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-12
Volume
87
Issue
12
Pages
1276-1279
ISSN
  • 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0412
OpenAlex
W2038176997
Cited by
16
References
24
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Forskningsrådet i Sydöstra Sverige
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Anxiety and Anesthesia Techniques
Keywords
pregnancy, prevalence, screening tool, prenatal care, phobic anxiety, DSM-IV diagnosis, fear of blood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood, Female, Humans, Injections, Phobic Disorders, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prevalence, Pregnant People, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review