Cited by 234Visual perception and processing mechanismsMultisensory perception and integrationNeural dynamics and brain function

Microstimulation of visual cortex affects the speed of perceptual decisions

Ditterich, Jochen, Mazurek, Mark E, Shadlen, Michael N·2003·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

Direction-selective neurons in the middle temporal visual area (MT) are crucially involved in motion perception, although it is not known exactly how the activity of these neurons is interpreted by the rest of the brain. Here we report that in a two-alternative task, the activity of MT neurons is interpreted as evidence for one direction and against the other. We measured the speed and accuracy of decisions as rhesus monkeys performed a direction-discrimination task. On half of the trials, we stimulated direction-selective neurons in area MT, thereby causing the monkeys to choose the neurons' preferred direction more often. Microstimulation quickened decisions in favor of the preferred direction and slowed decisions in favor of the opposite direction. Even on trials in which microstimulation did not induce a preferred direction choice, it still affected response times. Our findings suggest that during the formation of a decision, sensory evidence for competing propositions is compared and accumulates to a decision-making threshold.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn1094

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the two-choice task, LIP neurons seem to reflect the difference in firing rates between neurons tuned to two opposing directions of motion.

    “In the two-choice task, LIP neurons seem to reflect the difference in firing rates between neurons tuned to two opposing directions of motion21.”

    From Decision-making with multiple alternatives (2008) · cites this paper as [21]

  • Stimulation in MT seems to affect the decision process by mimicking a change in motion strength.

    “Stimulation in MT seems to affect the decision process by mimicking a change in motion strength.”
  • Even for sites restricted to have comparable changes in reaction time, MT stimulation had much stronger effects on choice than LIP stimulation (11.06 ± 0.72% coh vs. 1.62 ± 0.25% coh, P < 0.001, t test).

    “Even for sites restricted to have comparable changes in RT, MT stimulation had much stronger effects on choice than LIP stimulation (11.06 ± 0.72% coh vs. 1.62 ± 0.25% coh, P < 0.001, t test; Fig. 4, shaded region).”
  • At face value, microstimulation of neurons in LIP appears to affect decisions about motion in a manner qualitatively similar to stimulation of direction-selective neurons in area MT during the same task.

    “At face value, microstimulation of neurons in LIP appears to affect decisions about motion in a manner that is qualitatively similar to stimulation of direction-selective neurons in area MT during the same task16.”
  • According to the diffusion-to-bound model, MT stimulation was accounted for best as a change in the momentary evidence equivalent to 9.3% coherence (CI: 7.8 to 10.8% coh).

    “According to the model, MT stimulation was accounted for best as a change in the momentary evidence equivalent to 9.3% coh (CI: 7.8 to 10.8% coh).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ditterich, J., Mazurek, M. E., & Shadlen, M. N.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Shadlen, Michael N
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2003-07-13
Volume
6
Issue
8
Pages
891-898
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2152408796
Cited by
234
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation
  • Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • National Eye Institute (EY11378, R01EY011378)
  • National Center for Research Resources (RR00166, P51RR000166)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
middle temporal area, direction-selective neurons, motion perception, perceptual decision making, decision-making speed, decision threshold, evidence accumulation, direction discrimination, rhesus monkeys
MeSH terms
Animals, Discrimination, Psychological, Electric Stimulation, Female, Macaca mulatta, Motion Perception, Neurons, Time Factors, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review