Cited by 201Economic Theory and InstitutionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCulture, Economy, and Development Studies

Old Habits Die Hard:Path Dependency and Behavioral Lock-in

Barnes, William, Gartland, Myles, Stack, Martin·2004·Journal of Economic Issues

Abstract

(2004). Old Habits Die Hard:Path Dependency and Behavioral Lock-in. Journal of Economic Issues: Vol. 38, Papers From The 2004 AFEE Meeting, pp. 371-377.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00213624.2004.11506696

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barnes, W., Gartland, M., & Stack, M.
Venue
Journal of Economic Issues
Published
2004-06
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
371-377
ISSN
  • 0021-3624 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-326X
OpenAlex
W2236943162
Cited by
201
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Issues (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Keywords
path dependence, behavioral economics, habit formation, sunk costs, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review