Cited by 3Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderBehavioral and Psychological StudiesDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

A preliminary evaluation of the utility of sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms in predicting behavioral treatment response in children with behavioral difficulties

Open access
Little, Kelcey, Raiker, Joseph, Coxe, Stefany, Campez, Mileini, Jusko, Morgan, Smith, Jessica, Gnagy, Elizabeth, Greiner, Andrew +3 more·2021·Psychological Reports

Abstract

Interest in symptoms of sluggish cognitive tempo (SCT) has led to a number of studies evaluating how these symptoms respond to treatment commonly utilized in youths with symptoms of ADHD. No study to date, however, has examined the extent to which symptoms of SCT predict behavioral treatment response in youths across multiple domains of functioning. The current preliminary investigation integrates a number of methodological (e.g., direct observations) and analytic (e.g., Poisson regression) refinements to evaluate the extent to which symptoms of SCT predict treatment responses across multiple domains including behavioral (e.g., interruptions, rule violations), social (e.g., social skills, negative verbalizations), and severe behavioral difficulties (e.g., intentional aggression) above and beyond other demographic characteristics (e.g., symptom severity, Full Scale Intelligence Quotient [FSIQ]). A relatively small sample of 37 children, aged six to 12 years ( M = 8.03, SD = 1.83, 35 males: 2 females) attending an eight week multi-component intensive behavioral treatment program for youths with behavioral difficulties participated in the current study. Baseline parental perceptions of SCT were collected prior to the initiation of treatment. Results from this preliminary investigation revealed that pre-treatment SCT symptoms only predicted a less robust treatment response to time out which was associated also with parent’s perceptions of underlying working memory problems. Results revealed also that pre-treatment SCT symptoms failed to predict paraprofessional counselor’s and teacher’s improvement ratings of both rule following and social skills following treatment. Notably, other potential predictors (e.g., symptom severity, FSIQ) also largely failed to predict behavioral treatment response.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0033294120957239

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among adults with ADHD, SCT symptoms improved with lisdexamfetamine, with moderately large effect sizes largely independent of changes in ADHD symptoms.

    “Among adults with ADHD, SCT symptoms improved with lisdexamfetamine, with moderately large effect sizes that are largely independent of changes in ADHD symptoms.153”

    From Report of a Work Group on Sluggish Cognitive Tempo: Key Research Directions and a Consensus Change in Terminology to Cognitive Disengagement Syndrome (2023) · cites this paper as [153]

    The Abstract describes an eight-week behavioral treatment study in children aged 6–12. The Introduction mentions mixed findings on pharmacological treatment and SCT, but neither passage addresses lisdexamfetamine in adults, effect sizes, or whether SCT changes were independent of ADHD symptom changes. Searches for those terms found no passage supporting the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hilbe JM (2011). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Pelham WE Jr., Gnagy EM, Greiner AR, Waschbusch DA, Fabiano GA, & Burrows-Maclean L (2010). Summer treatment programs for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. In Weisz JR & Kazdin AE (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (2nd ed., pp. 277– 292). Guilford Press.
  3. Wechsler D (2011). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence–Second edition (WASI-II). NCS Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Little, K., Raiker, J., Coxe, S., Campez, M., Jusko, M., Smith, J., Gnagy, E., Greiner, A., Villodas, M., Coles, E., & Pelham, W. E.
Affiliations
Florida International University (US)
Corresponding author
Raiker, Joseph
Venue
Psychological Reports
Published
2020-09-13
Volume
124
Issue
5
Pages
2063-2091
ISSN
  • 0033-2941 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-691X
OpenAlex
W3086011701
Cited by
3
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
The Children's Trust (#7561)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
sluggish cognitive tempo, child behavior problems, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, time-out, rule-following, social skills, parental attitudes, predictors of treatment outcome
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review