Cited by 204Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Gender Differences in Silencing Following Childhood Sexual Abuse

O'Leary, Patrick J., Barber, James·2008·Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

The clinical literature commonly asserts that males are less likely than females to disclose child sexual abuse at the time it occurs and take longer to discuss their experiences. These hypotheses were tested in this study. This study included 145 men and 151 women. Participants were asked about disclosure at the time of the abuse and the length of time it took for them to discuss the experience. Comparison across these two studies found that boys were significantly less likely than girls to disclose the abuse at the time it occurred and also took significantly longer to discuss their childhood experiences later in life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10538710801916416

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common stereotypes about male survivors can influence the professionals who serve them, leading some to reinforce silence by suggesting the victims could have stopped the abuse.

    “O'Leary, and Barber (2008) found that popular stereotypes regarding male CSA survivors often reached the professionals working with them, causing them sometimes to help silence the victims by perpetuating the notion that they should have been able to prevent the abuse.”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as O'Leary, and Barber (2008)

  • Hostile views of male victims may deter boys from revealing abuse and men from talking about having been abused in childhood.

    “O'Leary and Barber (2008) explained that “negative attitudes towards male victims clearly have the potential to discourage boys from disclosing and men from discussing their experiences as abused children” (p.136).”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as O'Leary and Barber (2008)

  • A telephone survey of 145 men and 151 women found that men delayed disclosure longer than women and were more likely to be silenced.

    “The authors conducted telephone interviews with 145 men and 151 women and found that males generally took longer than females to disclose and ran an increased risk of being silenced.”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as O'Leary and Barber (2008)

  • O'Leary and Barber (2008) found that males had an increased chance of being silenced about their abuse.

    “In other words, males had an increased chance of being silenced regarding their abuse.”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as O'Leary and Barber, 2008

  • O'Leary and Barber (2008) found that social attitudes toward gender played an important role in silencing male victims.

    “The authors noted that social attitudes towards gender seemed to play an important role in the silencing of male victims.”

    From The Disclosure Experiences of Male Child Sexual Abuse Survivors (2016) · cites this paper as O'Leary and Barber, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Leary, P. J., & Barber, J.
Affiliations
RMIT University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
Published
2008-05-12
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
133-143
ISSN
  • 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0679
OpenAlex
W2048691298
Cited by
204
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian National University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, gender differences, disclosure, silencing, delayed disclosure, men and women
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Self-Assessment, Self Disclosure, Sex Factors, Survivors, Adult Survivors of Child Abuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review