Cited by 525Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Education and Learning Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Open access

Fischer, Frank, Kollar, Ingo, Stegmann, Karsten, Wecker, Christof·2013·Educational Psychologist

DOI 10.1080/00461520.2012.748005PMC PMC3557614

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article presents an outline of a script theory of guidance for computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL). With its 4 types of components of internal and external scripts (play, scene, role, and scriptlet) and 7 principles, this theory addresses the question of how CSCL practices are shaped by dynamically reconfigured internal collaboration scripts of the participating learners. Furthermore, it explains how internal collaboration scripts develop through participation in CSCL practices. It emphasizes the importance of active application of subject matter knowledge in CSCL practices, and it prioritizes transactive over nontransactive forms of knowledge application in order to facilitate learning. Further, the theory explains how external collaboration scripts modify CSCL practices and how they influence the development of internal collaboration scripts. The principles specify an optimal scaffolding level for external collaboration scripts and allow for the formulation of hypotheses about the fading of external collaboration scripts. Finally, the article points toward conceptual challenges and future research questions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00461520.2012.748005

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Untitled work
(1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 53,488
Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1 · Cited by 7,776
Untitled work
(1998) · Cited by 4,875
SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50019-4 · Cited by 4,544
Active‐Constructive‐Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities
Michelene, T. H. (2009) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x · Cited by 1,799
Educational Leadership
Boyd, W. L. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/02360-3 · Cited by 1,083
New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCL
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748006 · Cited by 722
Reconceptalizing change in the cognitive construction of knowledge
Dole, J. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (1998) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294 · Cited by 672
Dynamic Memory Revisited
Schank, R. C. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511527920 · Cited by 669
Collaboration Scripts – A Conceptual Analysis
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2 · Cited by 559
Self-citation

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 50 references

2 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

Dillenbourg P., 2007, Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives
10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5 · DOI
10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.033 · DOI
10.1080/00461520.1998.9653294 · DOI
Stegmann K., 2011, Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings Volume I—Long Papers, 406
Stegmann K., 2011, Unterrichtswissenschaft, 39, 231
10.1504/IJTEL.2010.031262 · DOI
Wang X., 2011, Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 Conference proceedings volume I—Long papers, 382
Wecker C., 2010, Learning in the Disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences—ICLS 2010, 1, 810
10.1016/j.chb.2009.08. 007 · DOI

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 525

The Theory of Immersive Collaborative Learning (TICOL)
Makransky, G., & Petersen, G. B. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09822-5 · Cited by 70
Computer-supported collaborative learning with digital video cases in teacher education: The impact of teaching experience on knowledge convergence
Zottmann, J., Stegmann, K., Strijbos, J.-W., Vogel, F., Wecker, C., & Fischer, F. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.014 · Cited by 50
Self-citation
Individual preparation for collaborative learning: Systematic review and synthesis
Mende, S., Proske, A., & Narciss, S. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2020.1828086 · Cited by 47
Epistemic agency for costructuring expansive knowledge‐building practices
Zhang, J., Tian, Y., Yuan, G., & Tao, D. (2022) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21717 · Cited by 46
The potential of temporal analysis: Combining log data and lag sequential analysis to investigate temporal differences between scaffolded and non-scaffolded group inquiry-based learning processes
Lämsä, J., Hämäläinen, R., Koskinen, P., Viiri, J., & Mannonen, J. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103674 · Cited by 47
Analyzing the knowledge construction and cognitive patterns of blog-based instructional activities using four frequent interactive strategies (problem solving, peer assessment, role playing and peer tutoring): a preliminary study
Wang, S., Hou, H., & Wu, S.-Y. (2016) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9471-4 · Cited by 44
An adaptive collaboration script for learning with multiple visual representations in chemistry
Rau, M. A., Bowman, H. E., & Moore, J. W. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.006 · Cited by 49
Supporting communities of learners in the elementary classroom: the common knowledge learning environment
Fong, C., & Slotta, J. D. (2018) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-018-9463-3 · Cited by 47
Microlearning for patient safety: Crew resource management training in 15-minutes
Gross, B., Rusin, L., Kiesewetter, J., Zottmann, J., Fischer, M. R., Prückner, S., & Zech, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213178 · Cited by 51
Facilitation of computer-supported collaborative learning in mixed- versus same-culture dyads: Does a collaboration script help?
Popov, V., Biemans, H. J. A., Brinkman, D., Kuznetsov, A. N., & Mulder, M. (2013) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.08.002 · Cited by 43
Group awareness support and argumentation scripts for individual preparation of arguments in Facebook
Tsovaltzi, D., Puhl, T., Judele, R., & Weinberger, A. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.012 · Cited by 43
Peer e-tutoring: Effects on students’ participation and interaction style in online courses
Sansone, N., Ligorio, M. B., & Buglass, S. L. (2016) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2016.1190296 · Cited by 43
Contribution to a theory of CSCL scripts: taking into account the appropriation of scripts by learners
Tchounikine, P. (2016) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9240-8 · Cited by 43
Uncovering the sequential patterns in transformative and non-transformative discourse during collaborative inquiry learning
Zhu, G., Xing, W., & Popov, V. (2019) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.02.001 · Cited by 48
Monitoring Student Interaction during Collaborative Learning: Design and Evaluation of a Training Program for Pre-Service Teachers
Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Leuders, T., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2016) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725716638010 · Cited by 43
Manipulating cognitive engagement in preparation-to-collaborate tasks and the effects on learning
Lam, R., & Müldner, K. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.05.002 · Cited by 42
Scripting to enhance university students’ critical thinking in flipped learning: implications of the delayed effect on science reading literacy
Lee, Y. (2017) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2017.1372483 · Cited by 45
Frontline Learning Research
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., et al. (2014) · Frontline Learning Research · doi:10.14786/flr.v2i3.96 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
A Topical Review of Research in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: Questions and Possibilities
Kaliisa, R., López‐Pernas, S., Misiejuk, K., Damşa, C. I., Sobocinski, M., Järvelä, S., & Saqr, M. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105246 · Cited by 42
Affective Learning in Digital Education—Case Studies of Social Networking Systems, Games for Learning, and Digital Fabrication
Näykki, P., Laru, J., Vuopala, E., Siklander, P., & Järvelä, S. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00128 · Cited by 57
‘Make it explicit!’: Improving collaboration through increase of script coercion
Papadopoulos, P. M., Demetriadis, S., & Weinberger, A. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12014 · Cited by 40
Self-regulation in online discussions: Aligning data streams to investigate relationships between speaking, listening, and task conditions
Wise, A. F., & Hsiao, Y.-T. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.034 · Cited by 47
FINCA – a conceptual framework to improve interprofessional collaboration in health education and care
Witti, M. J., Zottmann, J., Wershofen, B., Thistlethwaite, J. E., Fischer, F., & Fischer, M. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1213300 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Effects of an interculturally enriched collaboration script on student attitudes, behavior, and learning performance in a CSCL environment
Popov, V., Biemans, H. J. A., Fortuin, K. P. J., van Vliet, A. J. H., Erkens, G., Mulder, M., Jaspers, J., & Li, Y. (2019) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.004 · Cited by 42
Elementary students enhancing their understanding of energy-saving through idea-centered collaborative knowledge-building scaffolds and activities
Hong, H., & Lin, P.-Y. (2018) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9606-x · Cited by 39
Regulating self-organized collaborative learning: the importance of homogeneous problem perception, immediacy and intensity of strategy use
Melzner, N., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2020) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-020-09323-5 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions
Baker, A. R., Lin, T., Chen, J., Paul, N., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen‐Jahiel, K. (2017) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.007 · Cited by 44
Weak versus strong knowledge interdependence: A comparison of two rationales for distributing information among learners in collaborative learning settings
Deiglmayr, A., & Schalk, L. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.08.003 · Cited by 35
New TEL Environments for Vocational Education – Teacher’s Instructional Perspective
Hämäläinen, R., & Cattáneo, A. (2015) · Vocations and Learning · doi:10.1007/s12186-015-9128-1 · Cited by 36
Special Issue on CSCL: Discussion
Roschelle, J. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.749445 · Cited by 35
Forming shared inquiry structures to support knowledge building in a grade 5 community
Tao, D., & Zhang, J. (2018) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-018-9462-4 · Cited by 33
Beyond reading together: Facilitating knowledge construction through participation roles and social annotation in college classrooms
Zhu, X., Shui, H., & Chen, B. (2023) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100919 · Cited by 39
Integrating collaboration scripts, group awareness, and self-regulation in computer-supported collaborative learning
Schnaubert, L., & Vogel, F. (2022) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-022-09367-9 · Cited by 39
Using technology to promote student learning? An analysis of pre- and in-service teachers’ lesson plans
Wekerle, C., & Kollar, I. (2022) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2022.2083669 · Cited by 45
Self-citation
Inducing socio-cognitive conflict in Finnish and German groups of online learners by CSCL script
Weinberger, A., Marttunen, M. J., Laurinen, L. I., & Stegmann, K. (2013) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-013-9173-4 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
It is not either or: An initial investigation into combining collaborative and individual learning using an ITS
Olsen, J. K., Rummel, N., & Aleven, V. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-019-09307-0 · Cited by 33
Roles for Structuring Groups for Collaboration
Wever, B. D., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_17 · Cited by 32
The Collaboration Principle in Multimedia Learning
Kirschner, P. A., Kirschner, F., & Janssen, J. J. H. M. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139547369.027 · Cited by 33
Effect of regulation scripts for dialogic peer assessment on feedback quality, critical thinking and climate of trust
Cheng, L., Li, Y., Su, Y., & Gao, L. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2092068 · Cited by 35
Improving Students’ Argumentation Skills Using Dynamic Machine-Learning–Based Modeling
Wambsganß, T., Janson, A., Söllner, M., Koedinger, K. R., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.0615 · Cited by 46
How to Raise Different Game Collaboration Activities: The Association Between Game Mechanics, Players’ Roles and Collaboration Processes
Hämäläinen, R., Niilo-Rämä, M., Lainema, T., & Oksanen, K. (2018) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878117752470 · Cited by 30
“Do I feel threatened? No… I’m learning!”—Affective and relational dynamics in science professional development
Finkelstein, C., Jaber, L. Z., & Dini, V. (2018) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21489 · Cited by 31
The effects of pre-training types on cognitive load, collaborative knowledge construction and deep learning in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment
Jung, J., Shin, Y., & Zumbach, J. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1619592 · Cited by 30
Applying online content-based knowledge awareness and team learning to develop students’ programming skills, reduce their anxiety, and regulate cognitive load in a cloud classroom
Cheng, Y.-P., Shen, P.-D., Hung, M.-L., Tsai, C.-W., Lin, C.-H., & Hsu, L. C. (2022) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-020-00789-6 · Cited by 30
Preparation for Future Collaboration: Cognitively Preparing for Learning From Collaboration
Lam, R., & Kapur, M. (2017) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1386156 · Cited by 29
‘Supporting socially shared regulation during collaborative task-oriented reading’
Kielstra, J. G. G. M. A., Molenaar, I., van Steensel, R., & Verhoeven, L. T. W. (2022) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-022-09365-x · Cited by 30
Online collaborative learning in dyads: Effects of knowledge distribution and awareness
Kozlov, M. D., & Große, C. S. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.043 · Cited by 28
Controversy awareness on evidence-led discussions as guidance for students in wiki-based learning
Heimbuch, S., & Bodemer, D. (2016) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.12.001 · Cited by 34
Collaboration Scripts: Guiding, Internalizing, and Adapting
Vogel, F., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_18 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Ludvigsen, S., & Arnseth, H. C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02600-8_5 · Cited by 28
Just watching is not enough: Fostering simulation-based learning with collaboration scripts
Zottmann, J., Dieckmann, P., Taraszow, T., Rall, M., & Fischer, F. (2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.3205/zma001181 · Cited by 28
Self-citation
Cross-Disciplinary Research on Learning and Instruction – Coming to Terms
Heitzmann, N., Opitz, A., Stadler, M., Sommerhoff, D., Fink, M. C., Obersteiner, A., Schmidmaier, R., Neuhaus, B. J., Ufer, S., Seidel, T., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.562658 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Empowering collaborative knowledge construction through the implementation of a collaborative argument map tool
Ouyang, F., Zhang, L., Wu, M., & Jiao, P. (2024) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100946 · Cited by 30
Conversations with Four Highly Productive German Educational Psychologists: Frank Fischer, Hans Gruber, Heinz Mandl, and Alexander Renkl
Flanigan, A. E., Kiewra, K. A., & Luo, L. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9392-0 · Cited by 1
Educational Psychology and the Internet
Glassman, M. (2016) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781316155134 · Cited by 27
Understanding adults’ strong problem-solving skills based on PIAAC
Hämäläinen, R., Wever, B. D., Nissinen, K. J., & Cincinnato, S. (2017) · Journal of Workplace Learning · doi:10.1108/jwl-05-2016-0032 · Cited by 29
Extending the SIPS-Model: A Research Framework for Online Collaborative Learning
Kreijns, K., & Kirschner, P. A. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98572-5_21 · Cited by 26
Learning to diagnose collaboratively – Effects of adaptive collaboration scripts in agent-based medical simulations
Radkowitsch, A., Sailer, M., Schmidmaier, R., Fischer, M. R., & Fischer, F. (2021) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101487 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
Exploring students’ and lecturers’ views on collaboration and cooperation in computer science courses - a qualitative analysis
Schulz, S., Berndt, S., & Hawlitschek, A. (2022) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1080/08993408.2021.2022361 · Cited by 30
CSCL: connecting the social, emotional and cognitive dimensions
Ludvigsen, S. (2016) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-016-9236-4 · Cited by 26
Promoting Students’ Collective Cognitive Responsibility through Concurrent, Embedded and Transformative Assessment in Blended Higher Education Courses
Cacciamani, S., Perrucci, V., & Fujita, N. (2021) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-021-09535-0 · Cited by 25
Non-significant intention–behavior effects in educational technology acceptance: A case of competing cognitive scripts?
de, A. M. M., & Nistor, N. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.026 · Cited by 25
Use of an interculturally enriched collaboration script in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education
Popov, V., Biemans, H. J. A., Kuznetsov, A. N., & Mulder, M. (2014) · Technology Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2014.945474 · Cited by 27
An Augmented Paper Game With Socio-Cognitive Support
Wen, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2019.2924216 · Cited by 27
Split up, but stay together: Collaboration and cooperation in mathematical problem solving
Abdu, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (2020) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09512-7 · Cited by 24
Why learning space matters: a script approach to the phenomena of learning in the emergency remote learning scenario
Chattaraj, D., & Vijayaraghavan, A. P. (2021) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-021-00182-z · Cited by 24
Designing for learning during collaborative projects online: tools and takeaways
Sankaranarayanan, S., Kandimalla, S. R., Cao, M., Maronna, I., An, H., Bogart, C., Murray, R. C., Hilton, M. L., Sakr, M. F., & Rosé, C. P. (2020) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-04-2020-0095 · Cited by 27
The Effect of Individual and Social Metacognitive Support on Students' Metacognitive Performances in an Online Discussion
Zion, M., Adler, I., & Mevarech, Z. R. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633114568855 · Cited by 27
Who benefits from a low versus high guidance CSCL script and why?
Mende, S., Proske, A., Körndle, H., & Narciss, S. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9411-7 · Cited by 23
How to combine collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples to foster mathematical argumentation – when working memory matters
Schwaighofer, M., Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Strohmaier, A., Terwedow, I., Ottinger, S., Reiss, K. M., & Fischer, F. (2017) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-017-9260-z · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Investigating the self-study phase of an inverted biochemistry classroom – collaborative dyadic learning makes the difference
Kühl, S. J., Schneider, A., Kestler, H. A., Toberer, M., Kühl, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2019) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-019-1497-y · Cited by 24
Emotional and motivational effects of automated and personalized formative feedback: The role of reference frames
Weidlich, J., Fink, A., Jivet, I., Yau, J. Y.-K., Giorgashvili, T., Drachsler, H., & Frey, A. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13024 · Cited by 27
What students do when encountering failure in collaborative tasks
Lam, R. (2019) · npj Science of Learning · doi:10.1038/s41539-019-0045-1 · Cited by 22
A Conceptual Stance on CSCL History
Ludvigsen, S., Lund, K., & Oshima, J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65291-3_3 · Cited by 22
A Collaborative Clinical Simulation Model for the Development of Competencies by Medical Students
Guinez-Molinos, S., Martínez-Molina, A., Gomar-Sancho, C., Arias González, V. B., Szyld, D., García Garrido, E., & Maragaño Lizama, P. (2017) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2016.1248913 · Cited by 22
Use of Intelligent Agents in Collaborative MLearning: Case of Facilitating Group Learner Interactions
Njenga, S. T., Oboko, R. O., Omwenga, E., & Maina, E. M. (2017) · International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science · doi:10.5815/ijmecs.2017.10.03 · Cited by 22
Research Integration in Information Systems Education: Students’ Perceptions on Learning Strategies, Skill Development, and Performance
Natsis, A., Papadopoulos, P. M., & Obwegeser, N. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/4120 · Cited by 22
Comparing the effectiveness of CSCL scripts for shared task perceptions in socially shared regulation of collaborative learning
Miller, M., & Hadwin, A. F. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-024-09434-3 · Cited by 24
Designing a remote professional development course to support teacher customization in science
Bichler, S., Gerard, L., Bradford, A., & Linn, M. C. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106814 · Cited by 21
Blending Facebook discussions into seminars for practicing argumentation
Puhl, T., Tsovaltzi, D., & Weinberger, A. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.006 · Cited by 21
Conversational Agents as Group-Teacher Interaction Mediators in MOOCs
Demetriadis, S., Tegos, S. D., Psathas, G., Tsiatsos, Τ., Weinberger, A., Caballé, S., Dimitriadis, Y. A., Gómez‐Sánchez, E., Papadopoulos, P. M., & Καρακώστας, Α. (2018) · IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS) · doi:10.1109/lwmoocs.2018.8534686 · Cited by 21
Improving Students Argumentation Learning with Adaptive Self-Evaluation Nudging
Wambsganß, T., Janson, A., Käser, T., & Leimeister, J. M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555633 · Cited by 20
Visualization analysis on the research topic and hotspot of online learning by using CiteSpace—Based on the Web of Science core collection (2004–2022)
Shen, Y., Huang, L., & Wu, X. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1059858 · Cited by 21
How instructors frame students' interactions with educational technologies can enhance or reduce learning with multiple representations
Wu, S. P. W., Corr, J., & Rau, M. A. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.012 · Cited by 26
Differential impact of learning path based versus conventional instruction in science education
Smet, C. D., Wever, B. D., Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.04.001 · Cited by 22
Leveraging social networking sites for knowledge co-construction: Positive effects of argumentation structure, but premature knowledge consolidation after individual preparation
Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.06.004 · Cited by 20
Collaborate like expert designers: An exploratory study of the role of individual preparation activity on students' collaborative learning
Lyu, Q., Chen, W., Su, J., & Heng, J. (2023) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100920 · Cited by 19
Collaborative design practices in pre-service teacher education for technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): Group composition matters
Backfisch, I., Franke, U., Ohla, K., Scholtz, N., & Lachner, A. (2023) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-023-00192-z · Cited by 26
Comparing the effects of a collaboration script and collaborative reflection on promoting knowledge about good collaboration and effective interaction
Strauß, S., Tunnigkeit, I., Eberle, J., Avdullahu, A., & Rummel, N. (2024) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-024-09430-7 · Cited by 23
Leveraging affordances of immersive technology-supported collaborative learning (ITCL): A systematic review
Kang, J., Xu, X., & Yan, L. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13079-y · Cited by 23
Orchestrierungsmodelle und -szenarien technologie-unterstützten Lernens
Weinberger, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-18333-2_7 · Cited by 19
Learning to Diagnose with Simulations
Fischer, F., & Opitz, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89147-3 · Cited by 26
Self-citation
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Productive Peer Talk Moves
Hu, L., & Chen, G. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-023-09513-9 · Cited by 19
Aprendizaje estratégico y tecnologías de la información y la comunicación: una revisión crítica
Font, C. M. I., & Badia, A. (2013) · Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) · doi:10.14201/eks.10212 · Cited by 19
Identifying Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) Research in Selected Journals Published from 2003 to 2012: A Content Analysis of Research Topics and Issues.
Zheng, L., Huang, R., & Yu, J. (2014) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 18
Diagnosing Collaboratively: A Theoretical Model and a Simulation-Based Learning Environment
Radkowitsch, A., Sailer, M., Fischer, M. R., Schmidmaier, R., & Fischer, F. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89147-3_10 · Cited by 18
Self-citation
Supporting children’s place-based observations and explanations using collaboration scripts while learning-on-the-move outdoors
Zimmerman, H. T., & Land, S. M. (2022) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-022-09366-w · Cited by 20
Generating Situated Reflection Triggers About Alternative Solution Paths: A Case Study of Generative AI for Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
Naik, A., Yin, J. R., Kamath, A., Ma, Q., Wu, T., Murray, C., Bogart, C., Sakr, M. F., & Rosé, C. P. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-64302-6_4 · Cited by 17
Crossing boundaries in interprofessional education: A call for instructional integration of two script concepts
Kiesewetter, J., Kollar, I., Fernández, N., Lubarsky, S., Kiessling, C., Fischer, M. R., & Charlin, B. (2016) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.1080/13561820.2016.1184238 · Cited by 17
Self-citation
Identifying learning features and models for context-aware ubiquitous learning with phenomenological research method
Liu, G., Liu, T. C., Lin, C. C., Kuo, Y.-L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016) · International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation · doi:10.1504/ijmlo.2016.079501 · Cited by 17

Authors: Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C.
Affiliations: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author: Fischer, Frank
ORCID: Fischer, Frank
Kollar, Ingo
Stegmann, Karsten
Wecker, Christof
Venue: Educational Psychologist
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2013-01
Volume: 48
Issue: 1
Pages: 56-66
ISSN: 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
1532-6985
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2012.748005
PMC: PMC3557614
OpenAlex: W2131910319
Cited by: 525
References: 50
Citations by year: 2026: 51 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 16
FWCI: 81.77
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Locations: Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords: script theory, computer-supported collaborative learning, cooperative script, scaffolding, content knowledge, learner development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks