The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Online learner engagement: Conceptual definitions, research themes, and supportive practices
Abstract
Online learning has increased in prominence across all levels of education, despite reported learner engagement being lower online than during in-person learning. Most learner engagement research and frameworks have focused on in-person learning environments but new frameworks and strategies for online learner engagement are emerging. In this article, we integrate scholarship from educational technology with scholarship from educational psychology and the learning sciences to argue for a reconceptualization of online learner engagement that considers both critical dimensions of learner engagement and the environmental affordances that influence them. We review literature on cognitive, affective, and behavioral engagement, translating it to online contexts. We introduce five research themes and accompanying frameworks from online learning research that have shaped understanding of learner engagement in online learning environments (i.e., engagement through communication, interaction, presence, collaboration, and community). With this new perspective that synthesizes the dimensions of learner engagement and online environmental affordances, we expand online learner engagement scholarship. Finally, leveraging this reconceptualization, we share an exemplar framework and strategies for supporting online learner engagement followed by recommendations for future research and practice.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Similarly, the positive effects of SI are consistent with prior research indicating that social expectations, peer endorsement, and collective support can shape users’ acceptance of new technologies [61,103,104,105,106].”
In the citing paper
“Martin and Borup (2022) found that affective engagement can increase when others in a student’s course community facilitate communication, develop relationships, and instill an excitement for learning.”
From Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Martin and Borup (2022)
In the citing paper
“Research presents a struggle to find a clear centralized definition of engagement for online learning (Martin & Borup, 2022), and some have proposed that engagement be clearly defined by the researcher (Christenson et al., 2012).”
From Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Martin & Borup, 2022
In the citing paper
“Martin and Borup (2022) found that affective engagement can increase when others in a student's course community facilitate communication, develop relationships, and instill an excitement for learning.”
From Effects of Generative AI on Engagement and Performance Within Asynchronous Online Courses (2026) · cites this paper as Martin and Borup (2022)
Citations
Cites
Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6 · Cited by 6,619
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 · Cited by 3,050
The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.965823 · Cited by 2,911
Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education
Bull, G. L., Knezek, G., & Gibson, D. (2025) · Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education · doi:10.70725/833004pqfpbd · Cited by 2,374
A Handbook of Child Psychology
(1934) · Nature · doi:10.1038/133515b0 · Cited by 2,295
Framing student engagement in higher education
Kahu, E. R. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505 · Cited by 2,103
ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, R., & Archer, W. (2001) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875 · Cited by 1,885
The Theory and Practice of Online Learning
Anderson, T. D., & Elloumi, F. (2008) · Athabasca University Press eBooks · doi:10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.01 · Cited by 1,861
Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002 · Cited by 1,858
How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014) · Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference · doi:10.1145/2556325.2566239 · Cited by 1,850 · cited 3×
“Finally, Guo et al. (2014), when analyzing over 1500 postings from distance learners in China, determined that feedback, when facilitated in forums through responses learners received from their instructor, positively influenced cognitive engagement in the asynchronous online discussion.”
BackgroundAgency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities
Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002 · Cited by 1,618
Building Sense of Community at a Distance
Rovai, A. P. (2002) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79 · Cited by 1,207
Nonverbal overload: A theoretical argument for the causes of Zoom fatigue.
Bailenson, J. N. (2021) · Technology, Mind, and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000030 · Cited by 1,203
Academic Emotions and Student Engagement
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12 · Cited by 1,181 · cited 1×
“For instance, the phrase “ online learning ” was not found in any of the 39 chapters in the Handbook of Research on Student Engagement and only one chapter meaningfully mentioned online learning activities (Pekrun & Linnenbrink-Garcia, 2012).”
BackgroundA Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654309333844 · Cited by 1,171
Student Engagement: What Is It? Why Does It Matter?
Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_5 · Cited by 1,139 · cited 6×
“Cognitive engagement has been defined by Finn and Zimmer (2012) as “ the expenditure of thoughtful energy needed to comprehend complex ideas in order to go beyond the minimal requirements ” (p. 102).”
BackgroundInfluentialHillman, D. C. A., Willis, D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923649409526853 · Cited by 1,048
The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science
Sinatra, G. M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924 · Cited by 1,044
Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review
Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005 · Cited by 1,010
Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction
Anderson, T. D. (2003) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v4i2.149 · Cited by 890
The Electronic Journal of e-Learning
(2023) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · doi:10.34190/ejel · Cited by 765
Theoretical Principles of Distance Education
Hills, P. J., & Keegan, D. J. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121685 · Cited by 730
New Frontiers: Regulating Learning in CSCL
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748006 · Cited by 722
In support of a functional definition of interaction
Wagner, E. D. (1994) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923649409526852 · Cited by 643
A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009 · Cited by 616
Self-citationLearner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework
Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1481 · Cited by 566
Technology in Support of Collaborative Learning
Resta, P., & Laferrière, T. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9042-7 · Cited by 564
Language within language: immediacy, a channel in verbal communication
York, N. (1970) · Journal of Communication Disorders · doi:10.1016/0021-9924(70)90036-5 · Cited by 563
E-Learning in the 21st Century
Garrison, D. R. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203838761 · Cited by 549
Jeong, H., & Hmelo‐Silver, C. E. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654 · Cited by 538
An Online Engagement Framework for Higher Education
(2018) · doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175 · Cited by 497
Self-Efficacy as an Engaged Learner
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_10 · Cited by 439
Ben‐Eliyahu, A., Moore, D. W., Dorph, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2018) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.01.002 · Cited by 422
Blended Learning: Research Perspectives
Picciano, A. G., Dziuban, C. D., & Graham, C. R. (2007) · Cited by 414
Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for teaching in online learning environments
Archambault, L., Leary, H., & Rice, K. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2051513 · Cited by 389
Communities of Inquiry in Online Learning
Garrison, D. R. (2009) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-198-8.ch052 · Cited by 384
Engagement in School and Out-of-School Contexts: A Multidimensional View of Engagement
Fredricks, J. A. (2011) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.607401 · Cited by 380
The Role of Family Support in Facilitating Academic Success of Low-Income Students
Roksa, J., & Kinsley, P. (2018) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-018-9517-z · Cited by 374
Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities
Greenhow, C. M., Graham, C. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364 · Cited by 333
Baker, C. (2010) · The Journal of Educators Online · doi:10.9743/jeo.2010.1.2 · Cited by 332
Ku, H., Tseng, H., & Akarasriworn, C. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.019 · Cited by 310
Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning
Yamagata-Lynch, L. C. (2014) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1778 · Cited by 276 · cited 1×
“Yamagata-Lynch (2014) stated the importance of making deliberate, well-structured design-decisions when blending synchronous and asynchronous communication aspects of instruction (e.g., allowing flexibility through asynchronous communication but building a stronger sense of connection through…”
Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences?
Capdeferro, N., & Roméro, M. (2012) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127 · Cited by 272
Borup, J., Graham, C. R., West, R. E., Archambault, L., & Spring, K. J. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09744-x · Cited by 259
The Effects of Teacher Social Presence on Student Satisfaction, Engagement, and Learning
Wise, A. F., Chang, J.-Y., Duffy, T. M., & Martín, R. D. V. (2004) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/v0lb-1m37-rnr8-y2u1 · Cited by 256
Evaluating the quality of interaction in asynchronous discussion forums in fully online courses
Nandi, D., Hamilton, M., & Harland, J. (2012) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.667957 · Cited by 246
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D. T., & Gijselaers, W. (2013) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12020 · Cited by 221
Tate, T. P., & Warschauer, M. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597 · Cited by 217
A Self-regulated Learning Perspective on Student Engagement
Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_30 · Cited by 215
Achievement Goal Theory, Conceptualization of Ability/Intelligence, and Classroom Climate
Anderman, E. M., & Patrick, H. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_8 · Cited by 207
Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning
Ferdig, R. E. (2024) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.1184/r1/6686810 · Cited by 207
Examining interactivity in synchronous virtual classrooms
Martin, F., Parker, M. A., & Deale, D. F. (2012) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1174 · Cited by 206
Building bridges to advance the Community of Inquiry framework for online learning
Shea, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989 · Cited by 195
The role of students' motivation in peer‐moderated asynchronous online discussions
Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x · Cited by 174
Engagement Across Developmental Periods
Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B. J., Matjasko, J. L., & Farb, A. F. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_3 · Cited by 171
A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction
Kucuk, S., & Richardson, J. C. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1455 · Cited by 155
ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE ISSUES
Garrison, D. R. (2007) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v11i1.1737 · Cited by 152
Applying gamifications to asynchronous online discussions: A mixed methods study
Ding, L. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.022 · Cited by 141
Miller, A. N., Sellnow, D. D., & Strawser, M. G. (2020) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2020.1857418 · Cited by 125
Examining the impact of video feedback on instructor social presence in blended courses
Borup, J., West, R. E., Thomas, R. L., & Graham, C. R. (2014) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1821 · Cited by 123
Ethnicity and Student Engagement
Bingham, G. E., & Okagaki, L. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_4 · Cited by 119
Borup, J., & Evmenova, A. S. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i2.1468 · Cited by 119
The nature of teacher engagement at an online high school
Borup, J., Graham, C. R., & Drysdale, J. S. (2013) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12089 · Cited by 114
Virtually Successful: Defeating the Dropout Problem through Online School Programs
Roblyer, M. D. (2006) · Phi Delta Kappan · doi:10.1177/003172170608800107 · Cited by 103
Systematic Review of Two Decades (1995 to 2014) of Research on Synchronous Online Learning
Martin, F., Ahlgrim‐Delzell, L., & Budhrani, K. S. (2017) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2017.1264807 · Cited by 101
Engaging learners in the emergency transition to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic
Martin, F., Xie, K., & Bolliger, D. U. (2022) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2021.1991703 · Cited by 90
The Impact of Teaching Presence on Online Engagement Behaviors
Zhang, H., Lin, L., Zhan, Y., & Ren, Y. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116648171 · Cited by 84
Is the Second Time the Charm? Investigating Trends in Online Re-enrollment, Retention and Success
Hachey, A. C., Wladis, C. W., & Conway, K. M. (2012) · The Journal of Educators Online · doi:10.9743/jeo.2012.1.2 · Cited by 81
Computer-Assisted Language Learning
Yamazaki, K., & Thomas, M. (2023) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0305 · Cited by 69
Wu, P., & Wu, H. (2020) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09503-8 · Cited by 65
Teacher Perceptions of Parent Engagement at a Cyber High School
Borup, J. (2016) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2016.1146560 · Cited by 61
Measuring and Visualizing Students’ Behavioral Engagement in Writing Activities
Liu, M., Calvo, R. A., Pardo, A., & Martin, A. J. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2014.2378786 · Cited by 52
Factors underlying the perceived importance of online student engagement strategies
Bolliger, D. U., & Martin, F. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-02-2020-0045 · Cited by 50
Teacher Perceptions of Learner-Learner Engagement at a Cyber High School
Borup, J. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2361 · Cited by 48
Leony, D., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Pardo, A., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2013) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.030 · Cited by 45
Guo, W., Chen, Y., Lei, J., & Wen, Y. (2014) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci4020193 · Cited by 41
Student Perceptions of Online Teacher and On-site Facilitator Support in Supplemental Online Courses
Borup, J., Chambers, C. B., & Stimson, R. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i4.1565 · Cited by 37
Editorial: Conferences and changes
Moore, M. G. (1989) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923648909526674 · Cited by 35
Advising Experiences and Needs of Online, Cohort, and Classroom Adult Graduate Learners
Schroeder, S. M., & Terras, K. (2015) · NACADA Journal · doi:10.12930/nacada-13-044 · Cited by 33
The Nature of Parental Engagement at an Online Charter High School
Borup, J., Stevens, M., & Waters, L. H. (2015) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v19i5.699 · Cited by 30
Velasquez, A., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2013) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1465 · Cited by 29
Online Student Use of a Proximate Community of Engagement at an Independent Study Program
Oviatt, D., Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Davies, R. S. (2018) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1153 · Cited by 28
Developing a sense of community and the online student experience
Oliphant, T., & Branch-Mueller, J. L. (2016) · Education for Information · doi:10.3233/efi-160979 · Cited by 22
Responsibilities of Online Teachers and On-Site Facilitators in Online High School Courses
Borup, J., & Stimson, R. (2018) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2019.1554984 · Cited by 20
Borup, J., Walters, S., & Call-Cummings, M. (2019) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3605 · Cited by 18
Student Perceptions of Video Communication in an Online Sport and Recreation Studies Graduate Course
Atwater, C., Borup, J., Baker, R. E., & West, R. E. (2016) · Sport Management Education Journal · doi:10.1123/smej.2016-0002 · Cited by 14
The Implementation of Web Conferencing Technologies in Online Graduate Classes.
Zotti, R. (2017) · ProQuest LLC eBooks · Cited by 6
MOOCs and MOOC Camps for Online Teacher Professional Development
Mabuan, R. A. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429264900-6 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Archambault L., 2016, Journal of Online Learning Research,, 2, 303
- Borup J., 2020, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,, 28, 161
- Draus P. J., 2014, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,, 10, 240
- Drysdale J., 2016, International Journal of e-Learning,, 15, 149
- Freidhoff J. R., 2015, Journal of Online Learning Research, 1, 107
- Hodges C., 2020, Educause Review,, 27, 1
- Lowes S., 2015, Journal of Online Learning Research,, 1, 17
- Olson, P. G. (2014).An investigation into student engagement with an online collaboration platform (Edmodo) in a high school environmental science course[Doctoral dissertation]. University of Delaware.
- Trust T., 2020, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,, 28, 189
- Vygotsky L. S., 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, Ed.)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pillars of online pedagogy: A framework for teaching in online learning environments
Archambault, L., Leary, H., & Rice, K. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2051513 · Cited by 389
Foundations of online learning: Challenges and opportunities
Greenhow, C. M., Graham, C. R., & Koehler, M. J. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2090364 · Cited by 333
Tate, T. P., & Warschauer, M. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2062597 · Cited by 217
Unpacking student engagement in higher education learning analytics: a systematic review
Bergdahl, N., Bond, M., Sjöberg, J., Dougherty, M., & Oxley, E. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00493-y · Cited by 138
Saqr, M., López‐Pernas, S., Helske, S., & Hrastinski, S. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104787 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, F., & Borup, J.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Martin, Florence
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-07-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 162-177
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W4285083760
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 39 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 14
- FWCI
- 97.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Psychologist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, virtual learning environments, environmental affordances, online collaboration, online communities, student interaction, engagement framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
