The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptualizing student motivation
Abstract
Because classrooms are work settings in which students are engaged in compulsory activities and because the work involved is largely intellectual rather than physical, concepts and measures developed for studying motivation in free choice play situations have limited application to the study of student motivation for engaging in academic activities. More attention is needed to the cognitive aspects of motivation (not just its affective aspects) and to the value that students place on academic activity (not just their performance expectations and attributions). This article discusses these issues and offers suggestions about how teachers might become more successful than they are now in socializing their students to become motivated to learn. Motivation to learn in school means seeking to acquire the knowledge or skill that an academic activity is designed to develop, not merely getting the activity finished or doing the minimum necessary to meet requirements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586 · Cited by 2,675
The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation
Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461528309529266 · Cited by 853
Cited by
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33 · Cited by 8,332
Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.
Ames, C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261 · Cited by 6,468
Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation
Schunk, D. H. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653133 · Cited by 4,292
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594
Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design
Keller, J. M. (1987) · Journal of Instructional Development · doi:10.1007/bf02905780 · Cited by 2,332
Student engagement in high school classrooms from the perspective of flow theory
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Shneider, B., & Shernoff, E. S. (2003) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860 · Cited by 1,237
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562 · Cited by 921
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2000) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316 · Cited by 892
Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.105 · Cited by 756
Self-Efficacy and Education and Instruction
Schunk, D. H. (1995) · The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5_10 · Cited by 720
Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory
Blumenfeld, P. C. (1992) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.272 · Cited by 587
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3 · Cited by 573
Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics.
Turner, J. C., Meyer, D. K., Cox, K. E., Logan, C., DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. T. (1998) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.730 · Cited by 325
Chory‐Assad, R. M. (2002) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370209385646 · Cited by 286
Dev, P. C. (1997) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193259701800104 · Cited by 217
Kinzie, M. B. (1990) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02298244 · Cited by 181
Cole, A. W., Anderson, C., Bunton, T., Cherney, M. R., Cronin Fisher, V., Draeger, Jr., Featherston, M., Motel, L., Nicolini, K. M., Peck, B., et al. (2017) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v21i4.966 · Cited by 69
Experienced teachers: Their constructs of effective teaching
Covino, E. A., & Iwanicki, E. F. (1996) · Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education · doi:10.1007/bf00125499 · Cited by 42
Working Inside the Box: Exploring the Relationship Between Student Engagement and Cognitive Rigor
Paige, D. D., Sizemore, J. M., & Neace, W. P. (2013) · NASSP Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0192636512473505 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Brophy, J.
- Venue
- Educational Psychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1983-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 200-215
- ISSN
- 0046-1520 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-6985
- OpenAlex
- W2071543416
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.