Cited by 396Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsScience Education and Pedagogy

Structuring Effective Worked Examples

Ward, Mark, Sweller, John·1990·Cognition and Instruction

Abstract

Under some conditions, substituting worked examples for problems or exercises enhances learning and subsequent problem solving. Under other conditions, worked examples are no more effective, and possibly less effective, than solving problems. Using cognitive load theory, we hypothesize that the critical factors for enhanced learning are whether the worked examples can direct attention appropriately and reduce cognitive load. It is suggested that worked examples requiring students to mentally integrate multiple sources of information are not effective because they fail with respect to both of these factors. The results of five experiments using geometric optics and kinematics under classroom conditions provided evidence for these hypotheses. Worked examples, formatted to reduce the need for students to mentally integrate multiple sources of information, resulted in test performance superior to either conventional problems or to worked examples requiring students to split their attention between, for example, text and equations or text and diagrams. We conclude that because traditional worked example formats frequently are random with respect to cognitive factors, they may be ineffective in some areas and require restructuring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532690xci0701_1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ward, M., & Sweller, J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Venue
Cognition and Instruction
Published
1990-03
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1-39
ISSN
  • 0737-0008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-690X
OpenAlex
W2147435888
Cited by
396
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
FWCI
10.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition and Instruction (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
worked examples, cognitive load theory, problem solving, attentional demands, information integration, physics learning, kinematics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review