Cited by 11Digital literacy in educationArtificial Intelligence in EducationLibrary Science and Information Literacy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing and validating an AI literacy scale for university students in Vietnam

Do, Hung Van, Bui, Thuy Thanh, Hoa Tran, Duc, Nguyen, Hai Thi, Dinh, Ly Dieu·2026·IFLA Journal

Abstract

This study addresses the increasing role of artificial intelligence in higher education by developing a self-assessment instrument for artificial intelligence literacy among university students in Vietnam. Three primary dimensions of artificial intelligence literacy were identified: understanding, application, and ethics and responsibility. The scale was tested using data collected from 843 university students. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted on a sample of 420 students to explore the structure of the scale, and confirmatory factor analysis was carried out on a separate sample of 423 students to validate the tool. The analysis results showed that the final questionnaire demonstrated high reliability and validity; it comprised 26 items and the Cronbach's alpha coefficients for each dimension exceeded .886. This instrument not only supports the evaluation of students’ artificial intelligence literacy but also aids universities in designing appropriate training programs, thereby enhancing students’ awareness and ability to apply artificial intelligence in a creative and responsible manner.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/03400352251385058

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Çelebi C, Yilmaz F, Demir Ü, et al. (2023) Artificial intelligence literacy : An adaptation study. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning 4(2): 291–306.
  2. Concordia University and Dawson College (2021) Artificial Intelligence Competency Framework: A Success Pipeline from College to University and Beyond. Montréal: Pôle montréalais d’enseignement supérieur en intelligence artificielle (PIA). Available at: https://www.dawsoncollege.qc.ca/ai/wpcontent/uploads/sites/180/Corrected-FINAL_PIA_ConcordiaDawson_AICompetencyFramework.pdf.
  3. Kim SW, Lee Y (2022) The artificial intelligence literacy scale for middle school students. Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information 27(3): 225–238.
  4. UNESCO (2024a) AI Literacy Framework for Students. Paris: UNESCO.
  5. UNESCO (2024b) AI Literacy Framework for Teachers. Paris: UNESCO.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Do, H. V., Bui, T. T., Hoa Tran, D., Nguyen, H. T., & Dinh, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Vietnam National University, Hanoi (VN)
  • Faculty of Library and Information Science, University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Vietnam
Corresponding author
Bui, Thuy Thanh
Venue
IFLA Journal
Published
2025-10-22
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
222-233
ISSN
  • 0340-0352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2651
OpenAlex
W4415440013
Cited by
11
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IFLA Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
Keywords
AI literacy, scale development, scale validation, university students, higher education, Vietnam

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review