Cited by 120Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEating Disorders and BehaviorsGender Roles and Identity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Giscombe Superwoman Schema Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Associations with Mental Health and Health Behaviors in African American Women

Open access
Woods-Giscombe, Cheryl L., Allen, Amani M., Black, Angela R., Steed, Teneka C., Li, Yin, Lackey, Charity·2019·Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine the psychometric properties of the Giscombe Superwoman Schema Questionnaire. Three separate studies conducted with 739 African American women provided preliminary evidence that the Questionnaire's factor structure aligns with the Superwoman Schema Conceptual Framework and has good reliability. In addition, it is positively associated with perceived stress, depressive symptoms, using food to cope with stress, poor sleep quality, and physical inactivity. This study provides preliminary evidence to suggest that the Giscombe Superwoman Schema Questionnaire is psychometrically sound; Superwoman Schema is associated with health behaviors and psychological states that may increase risk for illness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01612840.2019.1584654

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.09.001 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/0891243202238981 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1177/0891243206294108 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Beauboeuf-Lafontant T, 2009, Behind the mask of the strong Black woman: Voice and the embodiment of a costly performance
  5. 10.1186/1471-2458-10-581 · DOI
  6. 10.2105/AJPH.2009.167817 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/smi.2464 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1207/s15327906mbr2903_5 · DOI
  10. 10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.805 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2307/2136404 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Crenshaw K, 1989, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139
  13. 10.1177/0095798414543014 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/BF00896802 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.047 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1177/1077558707305414 · DOI
  17. 10.4135/9781849208857.n10 · DOI
  18. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.060749 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1007/s12110-010-9078-0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.662 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1037//0278-6133.20.5.315 · DOI · Paper page
  22. hooks, b. (1993). Sisters of the yam: Black women and self-recovery. South End Press.
  23. Hoyle R. H, 2012, Handbook of structural equation modeling
  24. 10.1521/pedi.15.6.536.19187 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/cou0000062 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.11.011 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/sj.sc.3102127 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/0361684316646716 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/014662167700100306 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30106-1 · DOI
  31. Warren B. J, 1994, Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 32, 29, 10.3928/0279-3695-19940301-09 · DOI
  32. 10.1037/cdp0000015 · DOI
  33. 2003, Essence, 34, 188
  34. Whitt-Glover M. C., 2008, Preventing Chronic Disease, 5, A51
  35. 10.2105/AJPH.93.5.724 · DOI
  36. 10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05339.x · DOI
  38. 10.2105/AJPH.93.2.200 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1080/713667453 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1177/1533210110386776 · DOI
  41. Woods-Giscombe, C. L., Gaylord, S. A., Li, Y., Bangdiwala, S. I., Buse, J., Mann, F. D. … Faurot, K. (2016). Mindfulness-based diabetes risk reduction for African Americans with pre-diabetes: A pilot, sequential mixed-methods RCT. Annals of Behavioral Medicine , 50 , s1–s335. doi:10.1007/s12160-015-9766-4 · DOI
  42. 10.1037/1099-9809.14.3.173 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Woods-Giscombe C. L., 2012, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43, S50
  44. 10.1023/B:JOBM.0000013644.74404.02 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Metadata

Authors
Woods-Giscombe, C. L., Allen, A. M., Black, A. R., Steed, T. C., Li, Y., & Lackey, C.
Affiliations
  • School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA;
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2019-05-13
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
672-681
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
OpenAlex
W2945353172
Cited by
120
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institute of Nursing Research and the National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health (NR03443)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health (T32NR007091)
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Minority Fellowship Program at the American Nurses Association
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Nurse Faculty Scholars Program
  • Josiah Macy Foundation
  • University of California, Berkeley (UCB) Hellman Fund
  • USA
  • UCB Population Center, USA
  • UCB Research Bridging Grant, USA
  • UCB Experimental Social Science Laboratory, USA
  • Robert Wood Johnson Health and Society Scholars Program (UCB site), USA
  • UC Center for New Racial Studies, USA
  • UCB Institute for the Study of Societal Issues, USA
  • NIMHD grant (P60MD006902)
  • NIH-funded career development award, Building Interdisciplinary Careers in Women's Health (K12HD055892 NICHD/ORWH/NIH)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
Superwoman Schema, African American women, psychometric properties, factor structure, perceived stress, depressive symptoms, sleep quality, physical inactivity, health behavior, mental health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Black or African American, Depression, Female, Humans, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Health Behavior, Exercise, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review