Cited by 50Artificial Intelligence in EducationIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

My teammate is AI: understanding students’ perceptions of student-AI collaboration in drawing tasks

Kim, Jinhee, Cho, Young Hoan·2025·Asia Pacific Journal of Education

Abstract

Educators expect artificial intelligence (AI) to augment student capabilities and rapidly transform teaching and learning practices. However, little is known about students’ perceptions of AI and what they expect from AI in student-AI teaming. There is a lack of holistic understanding of the nature, effects, and areas of improvement in teamwork by students and AI on learning. This study aims to explore students’ perceptions and experiences about student-AI collaboration (SAC) to provide effective measures for the successful integration and implementation of SAC. In-depth interviews were carried out with 20 undergraduate students in South Korea after a drawing task with AutoDraw. This study found that students expected AI to serve various roles, including a learning mate, a tutor, and an effective tool to complete the task during SAC. Students perceived that SAC could benefit both the students’ affective domain and task performance. In contrast, students addressed multiple barriers to SAC both from the AI-related and student-related aspects. These findings can provide insights into the dynamic interaction between students and AI for problem-solving performance and meaningful learning. This study also provides implications on AI literacy education and the design of educational AI that can be made pedagogically rich to enhance student-AI teams.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02188791.2023.2286206

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., & Cho, Y. H.
Affiliations
  • Old Dominion University (US)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, Young Hoan
Venue
Asia Pacific Journal of Education
Published
2023-11-29
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
1013-1027
ISSN
  • 0129-4776 (ISSN-L)
  • 0218-8791
  • 1742-6855
OpenAlex
W4389144132
Cited by
50
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 7
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia Pacific Journal of Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
student perceptions of AI, drawing tasks, affective domain, task performance, AI adoption barriers, AI literacy, meaningful learning, problem-solving performance, undergraduate students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review