The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of rubric use in higher education
Abstract
This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post‐secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
Citations
Cites
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 1×
“As with any form of assessment, the clarity of the language in a rubric is a matter of validity because an ambiguous rubric cannot be accurately or consistently interpreted by instructors, students or scorers (Payne 2003).”
BackgroundUsing Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning.
Andrade, H. G. (2000) · Educational leadership · Cited by 528
Self-citationScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Andrade, H. G. (2005) · College Teaching · doi:10.3200/ctch.53.1.27-31 · Cited by 436
Self-citationWhat's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics.
Popham, W. J. (1997) · Educational leadership · Cited by 346
Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2020) · doi:10.7275/g367-ye94 · Cited by 332
Self-citationStudent-Involved Classroom Assessment
Stiggins, R. J. (2000) · Cited by 288
Arter, J. A., & McTighe, J. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 262
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268 · Cited by 258
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Arter , J. and Chappuis , J. 2007 . Creating and recognizing quality rubrics , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall .
- 10.1177/016146810210400603 · DOI
- Lapsley , R. and Moody , R. 2007 . Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non‐traditional students . Journal of American Academy of Business , 12 ( 1 ) : 167 – 72 .
- Marzano , R.J. , Brandt , R.S. , Hughese , C.S. , Jones , B.F. , Presseisen , B.Z. , Stuart , C. and Shhor , C. 1998 . Dimensions of thinking , Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
- Powell , T.A. 2001 . Improving assessment and evaluation methods in film and television production courses PhD diss., Capella University. UMI No. 3034481
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 909
Buyarski, C. A., & Landis, C. M. (2014) · International Journal of ePortfolio · Cited by 32
Franklin, R., & Smith, J. (2015) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v23.27986 · Cited by 32
The Future of Teaching English in Saudi Arabia
Assulaimani, T. (2019) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2019.070801 · Cited by 32
The Assessment of Speaking Skills at the Tertiary Level
Ounis, A. (2017) · International Journal of English Linguistics · doi:10.5539/ijel.v7n4p95 · Cited by 31
Uso de rúbricas en educación superior y evaluación de competencias
Martínez, L. C. V., & Hurtado, J. C. T. (2018) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v22i3.7998 · Cited by 31
Johansson, J., Contero, M., & Elgh, F. P. W. (2018) · Advanced Engineering Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.aei.2018.07.005 · Cited by 31
Tacoronte, D. V., González-Betancor, S. M., Cruz, A. M. B., Monroy, M. F., & Sánchez, I. (2015) · Revista Brasileira de Educação · doi:10.1590/s1413-24782016216403 · Cited by 30
Course-based research experience of undergraduate medical students through project-based learning
Si, J. (2020) · Korean journal of medical education · doi:10.3946/kjme.2020.152 · Cited by 30
Nsabayezu, E., Mukiza, J., Iyamuremye, A., Mukamanzi, O. U., & Mbonyiryivuze, A. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11113-5 · Cited by 30
Developing interactive oral assessments to foster graduate attributes in higher education
Tan, C. P., Howes, D., Tan, R. K. W., & Dancza, K. M. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.2020722 · Cited by 29
The effects of rubrics on evaluative judgement: a randomised controlled experiment
Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Khosravi, H. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1887081 · Cited by 29
Morton, J. K., Northcote, M. T., Kilgour, P. W., & Jackson, W. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.4.9 · Cited by 33
Großmann, L., & Krüger, D. (2023) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21832 · Cited by 42
Giacumo, L. A., Savenye, W. C., & Smith, N. D. (2012) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01355.x · Cited by 29
Rubrics as Tools for Effective Assessment of Student Learning and Program Quality
Olson, J. M., & Krysiak, R. S. (2021) · Advances in mobile and distance learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7653-3.ch010 · Cited by 27
Building Scholarly Writing Capacity in the Doctor of Nursing Practice Program
Shirey, M. R. (2013) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.04.019 · Cited by 27
Lönngren, J., Adawi, T., & Svanström, M. (2017) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2017.1404010 · Cited by 31
Modeling Holistic Marks With Analytic Rubrics
Tomás, C., Whitt, E. J., Lavelle-Hill, R. E., & Severn, K. E. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00089 · Cited by 30
Contreras-Higuera, W., Olmo, F. M., Rubio-Hurtado, M. J., & Baños, R. V. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633115612784 · Cited by 27
Martínez, L. C. V., & Hurtado, J. C. T. (2018) · International Education Studies · doi:10.5539/ies.v11n2p118 · Cited by 27
Ramon-Casas, M., Nuño, N., Pons, F., & Cunillera, T. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1525337 · Cited by 27
Rubrics for Assessing Hands-On Laboratory Skills
Harwood, C. J., Hewett, S., & Towns, M. H. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00200 · Cited by 26
An analysis of the effectiveness of feedback to students on assessed work
Taylor, C., & da Silva, K. B. (2013) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.863840 · Cited by 26
Tobajas, M., Molina, C. B., Quintanilla, A., Alonso‐Morales, N., & Casas, J. A. (2018) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2018.11.006 · Cited by 26
Assessing the Assessment: Rubrics Training for Pre-service and New In-service Teachers
Lovorn, M., & Rezaei, A. R. (2020) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/sjt6-5k13 · Cited by 27
Hempel, B., Kiehlbaugh, K., & Blowers, P. (2020) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2020.07.004 · Cited by 25
Emergence and outlook of competence-based education in European education systems: an overview
Tchibozo, G. (2011) · HAL · doi:10.1080/17496896.2010.556487 · Cited by 25
Venning, J., & Buisman-Pijlman, F. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.661842 · Cited by 25
Chong, D. Y. K., Tam, B., Yau, S. Y., & Wong, A. Y. L. (2020) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-020-02163-9 · Cited by 24
Raters’ perceptions of assessment criteria relevance
Humphry, S. M., & Heldsinger, S. (2019) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2019.04.002 · Cited by 25
Understanding when students are active‐in‐thinking through modeling‐in‐context
Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A. R., Gautam, D., Rus, V., & Shaffer, D. W. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12869 · Cited by 24
Compromiso del estudiante y percepción del proceso evaluador basado en rúbricas
Arrufat, M. J. G., & Raposo-Rivas, M. (2014) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2014.6423 · Cited by 24
Ullrich, L. E., Dumanis, S. B., Evans, T. M., Jeannotte, A. M., Leonard, C. E., Rozzi, S. J., Taylor, C. M., Gale, K., Kanwal, J. S., Maguire‐Zeiss, K. A., et al. (2014) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.3402/meo.v19.22623 · Cited by 24
Assessing oral presentation skills in Electrical Engineering: Developing a valid and reliable rubric
Sánchez, I., Tacoronte, D. V., González-Betancor, S. M., Monroy, M. F., & Cruz, A. M. B. (2016) · International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education · doi:10.1177/0020720916659501 · Cited by 24
Ibáñez, J. C., Sáiz, M. S. I., & Gómez, G. R. (2017) · Revista de Investigación Educativa · doi:10.6018/rie.36.1.278301 · Cited by 36
Marshall, E. C., & Underwood, A. (2019) · The Journal of Economic Education · doi:10.1080/00220485.2018.1551100 · Cited by 23
Project RAILS: Lessons Learned about Rubric Assessment of Information Literacy Skills
Belanger, J., Zou, N., Mills, J., Holmes, C., & Oakleaf, M. (2015) · portal Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2015.0050 · Cited by 23
The reliability and sources of error of using rubrics-based assessment for student projects
Varela, J. L. M., & Giralt, E. G. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1360838 · Cited by 23
Menéndez-Varela, J.-L., & Gregori-Giralt, E. (2018) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.06.001 · Cited by 23
Smith, G. S., & Paige, D. D. (2019) · Reading Psychology · doi:10.1080/02702711.2018.1555361 · Cited by 23
In-text and rubric-referenced feedback: Differences in focus, level, and function
Dirkx, K., Brinke, D. J.-T., Arts, J., & van Diggelen, M. (2019) · Active Learning in Higher Education · doi:10.1177/1469787419855208 · Cited by 23
Burgoyne, M. B., & Chuppa-Cornell, K. (2015) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.05.005 · Cited by 22
Kishbaugh, T. L. S., Cessna, S. G., Horst, S. J., Hostetler, L. A., Flanagan, T., Neufeld, D. G., & Siderhurst, M. S. (2012) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/c2rp00023g · Cited by 22
The examination of a teacher candidate assessment rubric: A confirmatory factor analysis
Bryant, C. L., Maarouf, S., Burcham, J. G., & Greer, D. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.03.012 · Cited by 25
Analytical rubrics in higher education: A repository of empirical data
Hack, C. J. (2015) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12304 · Cited by 21
Assessing Student Leadership Competency Development
Seemiller, C. (2016) · New Directions for Student Leadership · doi:10.1002/yd.20200 · Cited by 21
Foulstone, A. R., & Kelly, A. B. (2019) · International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2019.130209 · Cited by 20
Maor, R., Levi, R., Mevarech, Z. R., Paz-Baruch, N., Grinshpan, N., Milman, A., Shlomo, S., & Zion, M. (2023) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-023-09455-z · Cited by 24
OpenAI's GPT‐4 performs to a high degree on board‐style dermatology questions
Elias, M. L., Burshtein, J. G., & Sharon, V. R. (2023) · International Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/ijd.16913 · Cited by 20
Peltzer, K., Lorca, A. L., Krause, U.-M., & Busse, V. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101935 · Cited by 20
Christie, M., Grainger, P., Dahlgren, R. L., Call, K., Heck, D., & Simon, S. (2015) · Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.14434/josotl.v15i5.13783 · Cited by 20
Co-constructing a rubric checklist with first year university students
Bharuthram, S., & Patel, M. (2017) · Apples - Journal of Applied Language Studies · doi:10.17011/apples/urn.201708073430 · Cited by 21
A Novel Rubric Format for Providing Feedback on Process Skills to STEM Undergraduate Students
Czajka, C. D., Reynders, G. J., Stanford, C., Cole, R. S., Lantz, J. M., & Ruder, S. M. (2021) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2021.12290533 · Cited by 20
Leman, S. C., House, L., & Hoegh, A. B. (2015) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2015.1090337 · Cited by 20
Assessment of Parametric Assembly Models Based on CAD Quality Dimensions
Otey, J., Contero, M., & Camba, J. D. (2018) · Computer-Aided Design and Applications · doi:10.14733/cadaps.2019.628-653 · Cited by 20
Stevens, L. L., Fehler, M., Bidwell, D., Singhal, A., & Baumeister, D. (2022) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics7010025 · Cited by 19
Evaluar con Rúbricas. Una Propuesta Exitosa dentro del ABP
Artime, C. N., & Domínguez, J. L. B. (2022) · Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.15366/riee2022.15.1.006 · Cited by 19
van Helvoort, A. A. J. (2012) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2012.03.016 · Cited by 19
McGoldrick, K., & Peterson, B. (2013) · International Review of Economics Education · doi:10.1016/j.iree.2013.04.009 · Cited by 19
Active learning interventions and student perceptions
Lobo, G. J. (2017) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-09-2016-0061 · Cited by 20
Bergsmann, E., Klug, J., Burger, C., Först, N. M., & Spiel, C. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1378617 · Cited by 24
Planning for Student Variability
Quaglia, B. (2015) · Music Theory Online · doi:10.30535/mto.21.1.6 · Cited by 19
Rubric co-creation to promote quality, interactivity and uptake of peer feedback
Yan, D. “. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2333005 · Cited by 21
Karaman, P. (2024) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-024-00867-w · Cited by 77
Jönsson, A., Panadero, E., Pinedo, L., & Fernández‐Castilla, B. (2025) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2025.2486947 · Cited by 31
Language Models are Few-Shot Graders
Zhao, C., Silva, M. O., & Poulsen, S. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98459-4_1 · Cited by 23
Teaching Assistants’ Experiences of Tutoring and Assessing in Computer Science Education
Riese, E., & Kann, V. (2020) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie44824.2020.9274245 · Cited by 27
Nadolski, R. J., Hummel, H. G. K., Rusman, E., & Ackermans, K. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10030-7 · Cited by 18
Effects of Using Rubrics in a University Academic Level Romanian Literature Class
Laurian, S., & Fitzgerald, C. J. (2013) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.141 · Cited by 18
Grainger, P., Christie, M., Thomas, G. J., Dole, S., Heck, D., Marshman, M. F., & Carey, M. D. (2017) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2017.1295931 · Cited by 19
Content validation of an interprofessional learning video peer assessment tool
Nisbet, G., Jorm, C. M., Roberts, C., Gordon, C. J., & Chen, T. F. (2017) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-017-1099-5 · Cited by 18
Probing the landscape: Toward a systematic taxonomy of online peer assessment systems in education
Babik, D., Gehringer, E. F., Kidd, J. M., Pramudianto, F., & Tinapple, D. (2016) · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) · Cited by 18
The content aspect of validity in a rubric-based assessment system for course syllabuses
Giralt, E. G., & Varela, J. L. M. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100971 · Cited by 18
Improving Student Presentation Skills Using Asynchronous Video-Based Projects
Namin, A., Ketron, S. C., Kaltcheva, V. D., & Winsor, R. D. (2021) · Organizational Behavior Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/1052562920978805 · Cited by 18
Aprendizaje de lengua y literatura mediante rúbricas de evaluación
Vélez, K. J. G. (2021) · Sociedad & Tecnología · doi:10.51247/st.v4i2.103 · Cited by 18
What do we know about rubrics used in higher education?
Marin-Garcia, J. A., & Santandreu‐Mascarell, C. (2015) · Intangible Capital · doi:10.3926/ic.538 · Cited by 18
Jay, J., & Owen, A. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1071317 · Cited by 17
PRESENTACIÓN: Evaluación formativa con e-rúbrica: aproximación al estado del arte
de la Serna, M. C., & Bergman, M. (2014) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2014.6427 · Cited by 17
Bharuthram, S. (2015) · Africa Education Review · doi:10.1080/18146627.2015.1110907 · Cited by 18
Sari, D. P., Wulan, A. R., & Solihat, R. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022093 · Cited by 17
Pui, P., Yuen, B., & Goh, H. (2020) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1795811 · Cited by 17
Monbec, L., Tilakaratna, N. L., Brooke, M., Lau, S. T., Chan, Y. S., & Wu, X. V. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1855414 · Cited by 17
Supporting peer evaluation of student-generated content: a study of three approaches
Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Khosravi, H. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.2006140 · Cited by 17
Linking Rubrics and Academic Performance: An Engagement Theory Perspective
Francis, J. (2018) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.15.1.2 · Cited by 17
Like a bell responding to a striker: Instruction contingent on assessment
Huang, S.-C. (2012) · English Teaching Practice & Critique · Cited by 17
On the design and validation of a rubric for the evaluation of performance in a musical contest
Álvarez-Díaz, M., Muñiz-Bascón, L. M., Soria-Alemany, A., Veintimilla-Bonet, A., & Fernández-Alonso, R. (2020) · International Journal of Music Education · doi:10.1177/0255761420936443 · Cited by 16
Nsabayezu, E., Iyamuremye, A., Nahimana, J. P., Mukiza, J., Kampire, E., & Nsengimana, T. (2022) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-022-00005-y · Cited by 16
Yen, P. H., Phan, Q. T., & Thảo, L. T. (2023) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-023-00256-y · Cited by 16
Implementing an Open Personal Learning Environment
Soumplis, A., Chatzidaki, E., Koulocheri, E., & Xenos, M. (2011) · Panhellenic Conference on Informatics · doi:10.1109/pci.2011.2 · Cited by 16
Glaser, R. (2014) · Journal of Learning Design · doi:10.5204/jld.v7i2.202 · Cited by 15
Khosravi, H., Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., & Lodge, J. M. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3375462.3375532 · Cited by 16
Development and psychometric properties of rubrics for assessing social-emotional skills in youth
Pancorbo, G., Primi, R., John, O. P., Santos, D. D. D., Abrahams, L., & Fruyt, F. D. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100938 · Cited by 20
Reliability and validity test of a Scoring Rubric for Information Literacy
van Helvoort, A. A. J., Brand‐Gruwel, S., Huysmans, F., & Sjoer, E. (2017) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/jd-05-2016-0066 · Cited by 16
Psychometric properties of the ProficiencyIn+E rubric: Self-evaluation of teaching skills
Biencinto-López, C., García-García, M., Molina, E. C., Manero, P. V., & Manresa, S. T. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101040 · Cited by 23
Validation of a novel intraoperative assessment tool: The Surgical Procedure Feedback Rubric
Toprak, A., Luhanga, U., Jones, S., WINTHROP, A. L., & McEwen, L. A. (2015) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.032 · Cited by 16
Validation of an Assessment Rubric via Controlled Modification of a Classroom Activity
Bauer, C. F., & Cole, R. S. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/ed2003324 · Cited by 15
Kranenburg, L., Reerds, S. T. H., Cools, M., Alderson, J., Muscarella, M., Magrite, E., Kuijper, T. M., Abdelgaffar, S., Balsamo, A., Brauner, R., et al. (2017) · Hormone Research in Paediatrics · doi:10.1159/000475992 · Cited by 15
Writing Across the Curriculum: Reliability Testing of a Standardized Rubric
Minnich, M., Kirkpatrick, A. J., Goodman, J. T., Whittaker, A., Chapple, H. S., Schoening, A. M., & Khanna, M. M. (2018) · Journal of Nursing Education · doi:10.3928/01484834-20180522-08 · Cited by 15
Rubrics as Assessment, Evaluation and Scoring Tools
Muhammad, A., Lebar, O., & Mokshein, S. E. (2018) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i10/5309 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H.
- Affiliations
- ICFAI Business School (IN)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reddy, Y. Malini
- ORCID
- Andrade, Heidi
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-448
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2025828126
- Cited by
- 917
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 46.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University at Albany
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- rubrics, higher education assessment, academic performance, rater reliability, rubric validity, student perceptions, program evaluation, course improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review