The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of rubric use in higher education
Abstract
This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post‐secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
Citations
Cites
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 1×
“As with any form of assessment, the clarity of the language in a rubric is a matter of validity because an ambiguous rubric cannot be accurately or consistently interpreted by instructors, students or scorers (Payne 2003).”
BackgroundUsing Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning.
Andrade, H. G. (2000) · Educational leadership · Cited by 528
Self-citationScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Andrade, H. G. (2005) · College Teaching · doi:10.3200/ctch.53.1.27-31 · Cited by 436
Self-citationWhat's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics.
Popham, W. J. (1997) · Educational leadership · Cited by 346
Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2020) · doi:10.7275/g367-ye94 · Cited by 332
Self-citationStudent-Involved Classroom Assessment
Stiggins, R. J. (2000) · Cited by 288
Arter, J. A., & McTighe, J. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 262
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268 · Cited by 258
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Arter , J. and Chappuis , J. 2007 . Creating and recognizing quality rubrics , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall .
- 10.1177/016146810210400603 · DOI
- Lapsley , R. and Moody , R. 2007 . Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non‐traditional students . Journal of American Academy of Business , 12 ( 1 ) : 167 – 72 .
- Marzano , R.J. , Brandt , R.S. , Hughese , C.S. , Jones , B.F. , Presseisen , B.Z. , Stuart , C. and Shhor , C. 1998 . Dimensions of thinking , Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
- Powell , T.A. 2001 . Improving assessment and evaluation methods in film and television production courses PhD diss., Capella University. UMI No. 3034481
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–800 of 909
Analytic Rubrics for Decision Making
Chow, A. F., & Woodford, K. C. (2014) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5202-6.ch011
Forskningsbaseret læring og innovativ praksis på jurauddannelsen
Schäfke, W., Kristiansen, B., Elgaard, K. K. E., & Hølmkjær, M. S. (2018) · Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift · doi:10.7146/dut.v13i24.96746
Improving Student Outcomes through Rubric Redesign
Raymond, R. D., Alkrisat, M., & Hebda, T. L. (2018)
Tetrick, K., Schneider, J. B., & Pezeshki, C. (2018) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--27757
Teaching Training in Medical Students as an Elective Subject
Urrutia-Aguilar, M. E., Arce-Cedeño, A., Guzmán, R. G., Beck, E., & Aburto-Arciniega, M. B. (2018) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2018.98090
Measuring Cogency in Argument in the Seventh-Grade English Classroom
Gonzalez-Balsam, M. (2020) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1575117
Dessai, K. G., & Kamat, V. V. (2018) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.2018100104
Gascueña, N. V., Fernández, J. P. R., & Pérez, M. P. S. (2018) · Advances in Building Education · doi:10.20868/abe.2018.2.3789
Bharuthram, S. (2018) · Journal for Language Teaching · doi:10.4314/jlt.v52i1.1
Sabiote, C. R., Rodríguez, J. Á., & Durán, R. D. P. G. (2018) · Revista Meta Avaliação · doi:10.22347/2175-2753v10i30.1598
The Impact of an Online Scholarly Writing Tutorial for RN-BSN StudentsPreprint
Riley, E. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3238896
The Impact of Rubric Use on Peer Feedback Tasks in a TESOL Practicum
Lindahl, K., Christison, M., & Tomaš, Z. (2019) · Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research (University of Central Lancashire)
DEVELOPING FUTURE ENGLISH TEACHERS’ WRITING SKILLS USING CHECKLISTS
Datskiv, O. (2018) · The Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy · doi:10.25128/2415-3605.18.2.8
Ashjari, H. (2018) · Recherches en didactique des mathématiques
Valor, M. V., Cazorla, M. P., Leuba, E. M., Aparisi-Torrijo, J., Pacheco-Blanco, B., Sendra, C. E., & Sanchís, E. J. (2018) · International Conference on Innovation, Documentation and Education (INNODOCT) · doi:10.4995/inn2018.2018.8817
Fernández, M. D. R., & Abad, P. (2019) · International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd) · doi:10.4995/head19.2019.9460
Chileshe, F., & Jacob, H. (2019) · Mathematical theory and modeling · doi:10.7176/mtm/9-7-02
Estudo da disposição final de resíduos da construção civil em Campina Grande-PB.
Torres, P. R. B., Tenório, E. A. G., da Silva, J. H. G., & de Menezes, W. R. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.06
Aplicação da metodologia BIM em curso de Engenharia Civil de Infraestrutura
de Oliveira, N. S., & Pfützenreuter, A. H. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.23
Modelo de aprendizagem para a disciplina de expressão gráfica
Consoli, O. J., Consoli, I. O., & Consoli, A. V. B. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.22
Apresentação de seminários como metodologia complementar de ensino de Física para as engenharias
do Amaral, M. A., Nascimento, A. D. S., & Rodrigues, A. G. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.26
Correa, F. C., Santos, G. C. F., Lourinho, J. P. D. S., & Monteiro, N. J. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.18
Lima, S. G., de Melo, A. M. C., Nobre, E. V., Nascimento, J. M. R. E. S., Costa, M. L., & Netto, A. P. D. O. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.21
Caldeira, S. D. A., & Reis, T. L. B. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.25
Módulos de comunicação para controle preciso
Martins, A. R., Hecht, R. D. S., & Fung, C. W. H. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.17
Desenvolvimento de uma unidade para a redução e calcinação de catalisadores para ensaios didáticos
da Silva, D. S., Almeida, D. F., Silva, J. G. A. B., de Assumpção, S. M. N., Santos, R. C., & Pontes, L. A. M. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.02
Programa engenharia para inovação industrial: Um estudo de caso de universidade no chão-de-fábrica
Câmara, J. C. C., Ferraz, T. G. D. A., Neves, C. D. S., Calado, F., & Souza, J. L. O. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.13
Instrumentação de uma célula eletrolítica
dos Reis, G. D. P., Segundo, A. K. R., Leal, E. M., Matos, S. N., & Figueiredo, R. L. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.03
Student-to-Student Communication in Online Graduate-Level Education Courses
Vickers, J. C. (2017) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-2682-7.ch001
Møller, K. L., & Løvschal, M. (2020) · Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM) · doi:10.7146/lom.v12i22.114504
Tregloan, K. (2012) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2012.139
DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAM OUTCOME ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR POLYTECHNIC COURSES
Swami, S., Karanjkar, D., Hingmire, S., & Karad, S. G. (2020) · International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology · doi:10.33564/ijeast.2020.v04i12.074
Progettare la valutazione per competenze nell'istruzione superiore
Angelis, M. D., & Trinchero, R. (2020) · Giornale italiano della ricerca educativa · doi:10.7346/sird-012020-p37
International Business Matters
Ashley, S. M. (2020) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/21
Diseño de una rúbrica análitica socioformativa para evaluar promoción de salud bucal
Penagos, R. G. V., Hernández, L. G. J., & Tobón, S. (2020) · Revista Habanera de Ciencias Médicas
de Oliveira, T., Stringhini, D., Craibas, J. J. S., & Corrêa, D. G. M. (2020) · Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação · doi:10.5753/rbie.2020.28.0.166
de Oliveira, T., & Stringhini, D. (2020) · RENOTE · doi:10.22456/1679-1916.105918
Primary Trait Rubric: The Case of MENA Countries
Sanavi, R. V. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53254-3_9
الرفاعی, ا. م. ص. م. (2020) · مجلة کلية التربية بدمياط · doi:10.21608/jsdu.2020.132140
KHA, Đ. K. T. (2020) · Journal of Science and Technology - IUH · doi:10.46242/jst-iuh.v43i01.613
Agostini, D., & Petrucco, C. (2020) · EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING · doi:10.3280/exioa2-2020oa10811
Evaluate manuscripts or digital assignments fairly and easily
Marques, B. P., Cardoso, M., Reis, R., & Marques, R. F. (2020) · Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) · doi:10.1145/3434780.3436680
A proposed model of cognitive approach to assess clinical performance of dental students
Khalifah, A. M. (2021) · Journal of Stomatology · doi:10.5114/jos.2021.104700
Rethinking Evaluation Within a College Pathology Course
Morch, E. A., & Fovet, F. (2021) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7106-4.ch011 · Cited by 1
Abbas, G., Qutoshi, S. B., & Angaiz, D. (2019) · Pakistan Journal of Social Research · doi:10.52567/pjsr.v1i01.6
La interpretación bilateral en el ámbito turístico: evaluación
García, C. Á., & Limbach, C. (2019) · Futhark Revista de Investigación y Cultura · doi:10.12795/futhark.2019.i14.01
El reto de evaluar presentaciones orales: uso de una rúbrica en un posgrado de educación médica
López, A. O., Mansilla, M. P., López, M. P. J. M., Flores, M. D. H., García-Minjares, M., Mendiola, M. S., & van der Goes, T. I. F. (2021) · Investigación en Educación Médica · doi:10.22201/fm.20075057e.2021.39.21345
Ramos, E. F., Rodríguez, M. L. N., & Henao-Castaño, Á. M. (2021) · Revista Edu-Física
Jimenez‐Perez, I., Requena-Bueno, L., Gil-Calvo, M., Pérez‐Soriano, P., & Priego‐Quesada, J. I. (2021) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2021.2021.13658
Musid, N. A., Affandi, H. M., & Mohd, F. M. K. (2019) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.2641694
de Boer, I., de Vegt, F., Pluk, H., & Latijnhouwers, M. (2021) · IAMSE manuals · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86848-2_1
Peer Assessment in Multicultural Classrooms: Tensions and Opportunities
Alt, D., & Raichel, N. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71644-8_6
Riese, E., & Kann, V. (2022) · Nordic Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.5324/njsteme.v4i2.4029
Engaging with Conceptual Acrobatics: Geography Assessment Standards and Rubrics
Heck, D. (2022) · Key challenges in geography · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95139-9_10
La interpretación bilateral en el ámbito turístico: evaluación
García, C. Á., & Limbach, C. (2020) · Futhark Revista de Investigación y Cultura · doi:10.12795/futhark.2020.i15.13
Understanding Strategies of Teacher-Student Interaction
Kille, T. L. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0783-3.ch076
Plano de manutenção de ativos físicos como parte estratégica do negócio
de Souza, R. F., & Brito, J. N. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.19
Analisis Berpikir Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Dimensi Tiga Berdasarkan Van Hiele
Indah, A., Yudianto, E., Sugiarti, T., & Murniawati, T. (2021) · Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning · doi:10.19184/jomeal.v1i2.24323
Fernandes, R. B. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.11
Understanding Grader Reliability through the Lens of Cognitive Modeling
Hicks, N., Douglas, K. A., & Diefes‐Dux, H. A. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--33477
(2010) · Higher Education Abstracts · doi:10.1111/j.2150-1092.2010.00017_30.x
Potencial da aplicação de fibras de coco em matriz à base de cimento Portland
Nakata, R. H., Ogata, D. R. M., & Lima, J. M. (2019) · Editora Poisson eBooks · doi:10.36229/978-85-7042-190-6.cap.05
Redaktionen (2018) · Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift · doi:10.7146/dut.v13i24.104689
Designing an Android-Based Peer Assessment E-Rubric
Cahyani, H., Setiawan, A. W., & Hanayeen, N. (2022) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v16i09.28107
Transparency in a University Introductory Course Made Simple
Brown, P. P., Kuck, S., Armstrong, J., & Ham, C. A. (2022) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-9549-7.ch005
The Research Journey as a Challenge Towards New Trends
Rodas, A. G., López, Á. M. Á., Rendón, Á. L. P., Enrique, I. V. L., Cárdenas, A. M. C., Arias, C. A., Jerez, O. B., Ossa, C. F., Giraldo, M. C. G., Cardona, E. B., et al. (2021) · Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira eBooks · doi:10.22517/9789587225723
COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT USING RUBRICS AND SOCIAL NETWORKS AND BRINGING YOUR OWN DEVICE (BYOD)
Urbano, B., Bartolomé, A. M., Carpio, D. A., & González‐Andrés, F. (2022) · Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume I · doi:10.36315/2022v1end022
Quasi-Experimental and Crossover Design Methodology to Develop Undergraduate Research Competence
Uaciquete, A. S., & Valcke, M. (2022) · AVRUG-bulletin/Afrika Focus · doi:10.1163/2031356x-35010003 · Cited by 2
Excellence bias related to rating scales with summative jury assessment
Corradi, D. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2112653
Lehmann, E. (2021) · American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (AERA) · doi:10.3102/1686418
Going Beyond ‘Good Enough’ Teaching in Psychiatric Training
Sarkar, S. N., & Cohn, V. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009053938.004
Marzano‐Felisatti, J. M., Sánchez‐Jiménez, J. L., Aparicio, I., Sanchís-Sanchís, R., Jimenez‐Perez, I., Priego‐Quesada, J. I., & Pérez‐Soriano, P. (2022) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2022.2022.15870
การพฒนาแบบประเมนรายงานกรณศกษาผปวยและครอบครวทมปญหาสขภาพซบซอนทพบในเวชปฏบตปฐมภม
ชุมพล, จ., กาญจนสุวรรณ, ศ., แดงใจ, ธ., & พูนเพชรรัตน์, ป. (2022) · Ramathibodi Medical Journal · doi:10.33165/rmj.2022.45.4.259391
I betrayed my ethical principles: Investigating master’s dissertation marking practices in CS
Ada, M. B. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering · doi:10.1109/tale54877.2022.00021
Qualitative Assessment Guidelines for MSc Graduation Projects in Electrical Engineering
Radulov, G. I., Serra, R., Basten, T., Martínez, M. C., & Greijmans, M. (2023) · Annual Conference of the European Association for Education in Electrical and Information Engineering (EAEEIE) · doi:10.23919/eaeeie55804.2023.10181593
The Effect of Peer-Assessment Method in Enhancing Iraqi EFL University Students’ Language Ability
Sagban, A. A. (2017) · Kufa Journal of Arts · doi:10.36317/kaj/2017/v1.i32.6039
Donnelly, R., & Hughes, C. (2023) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6086-3.ch009
The Importance of Student Partnership in Rubric Construction, Discussion, and Evaluation
Laville, A., Thompson, L., Yue, Y., Hayward, A. J., & Grace-Bland, V. (2023) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6086-3.ch007
Learning How to Become a Teacher Researcher
O’Brien, E., Brady, J., CEALLAIGH, T. Ó., Babbitt, K., Brosnan, A., Byrne, E., Byrne, E. N., Curtin, R., Gaffney, L., & O'Callaghan, K. (2023) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6086-3.ch004 · Cited by 1
Açıkgöz, Ö., Aslan, A., Koçak, K., Günay, A., & Yavuz, N. (2023) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6086-3.ch010
Theophilou, E., Lobo-Quintero, R., Sánchez-Reina, J. R., & Hernández‐Leo, D. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42141-9_7
A Diagnostic Analysis of Observational Sketching: Examples from the University of Latvia
Urdziņa-Deruma, M., Celmiņa-Ķeirāne, A., Avotiņa, A., & Karlsone, I. (2023) · Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia · doi:10.15388/actpaed.2023.50.9
Methods to improve grading reliability in multi-section undergraduate courses
Ash, A. M., & Zawily, A. E. (2023) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2023.2247407
Assessment model of university innovation ecosystems in ASEAN
Chaipongpati, J. (2021) · doi:10.58837/chula.the.2021.388
Anderson, N. (2023) · Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education · doi:10.47408/jldhe.vi28.1006
Rubrics in Terms of Development Processes and Misconceptions
Elkonca, F., Ceyhan, G., & Şata, M. (2023) · Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi · doi:10.21031/epod.1251470
Hansen, S. T., & Troelsen, R. (2023) · Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift · doi:10.7146/dut.v18i35.137095
TAHAPAN DESAIN ANDROID BASED TEST PADA PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN KELAUTAN DAN PERIKANAN
Satibi, A. (2020) · Jurnal Kemaritiman Indonesian Journal of Maritime · doi:10.17509/ijom.v1i2.29808
Developing a Classroom Assessment Rubric: An Example From a Research-Based Undergraduate Course
Mishra, C., Parker, L. C., & Clase, K. L. (2022) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.1080/0047231x.2022.12290582
Hastiana, Y., & Rohmah, S. K. (2023) · JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen Kepemimpinan dan Supervisi Pendidikan) · doi:10.31851/jmksp.v8i2.13016
Jabri, S., & Fadhlaoui, J. (2023) · Studies in Applied Linguistics and TESOL · doi:10.52214/salt.v23i2.12086
Developing a Toolkit for Assessing Labor Productivity on Construction Sites
Le, D., Chi, D., Dang, C. N., & Le‐Hoai, L. (2023) · Lecture notes in civil engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-7434-4_47
de Campos, D. S., & Ferreira, D. J. (2024) · Journal of Engineering Research · doi:10.22533/at.ed.1317412409017
de Campos, D. S., & Ferreira, D. J. (2024) · doi:10.22533/at.ed.4332405029
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H.
- Affiliations
- ICFAI Business School (IN)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reddy, Y. Malini
- ORCID
- Andrade, Heidi
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-448
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2025828126
- Cited by
- 917
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 46.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University at Albany
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- rubrics, higher education assessment, academic performance, rater reliability, rubric validity, student perceptions, program evaluation, course improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review