The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of rubric use in higher education
Abstract
This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post‐secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
Citations
Cites
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 1×
“As with any form of assessment, the clarity of the language in a rubric is a matter of validity because an ambiguous rubric cannot be accurately or consistently interpreted by instructors, students or scorers (Payne 2003).”
BackgroundUsing Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning.
Andrade, H. G. (2000) · Educational leadership · Cited by 528
Self-citationScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Andrade, H. G. (2005) · College Teaching · doi:10.3200/ctch.53.1.27-31 · Cited by 436
Self-citationWhat's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics.
Popham, W. J. (1997) · Educational leadership · Cited by 346
Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2020) · doi:10.7275/g367-ye94 · Cited by 332
Self-citationStudent-Involved Classroom Assessment
Stiggins, R. J. (2000) · Cited by 288
Arter, J. A., & McTighe, J. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 262
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268 · Cited by 258
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Arter , J. and Chappuis , J. 2007 . Creating and recognizing quality rubrics , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall .
- 10.1177/016146810210400603 · DOI
- Lapsley , R. and Moody , R. 2007 . Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non‐traditional students . Journal of American Academy of Business , 12 ( 1 ) : 167 – 72 .
- Marzano , R.J. , Brandt , R.S. , Hughese , C.S. , Jones , B.F. , Presseisen , B.Z. , Stuart , C. and Shhor , C. 1998 . Dimensions of thinking , Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
- Powell , T.A. 2001 . Improving assessment and evaluation methods in film and television production courses PhD diss., Capella University. UMI No. 3034481
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A model for programmatic assessment fit for purpose.
van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Schuwirth, L. W. T., Driessen, E. W., Dijkstra, J., Tigelaar, D., Baartman, L. K. J., & van Tartwijk, J. (2012) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2012.652239 · Cited by 892
The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002 · Cited by 839
Assessment rubrics: towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice
Dawson, P. (2017) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294 · Cited by 368
Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently)
Schinske, J., & Tanner, K. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.cbe-14-03-0054 · Cited by 326
The quality and effectiveness of descriptive rubrics
Brookhart, S., & Chen, F. (2015) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/00131911.2014.929565 · Cited by 254
Abrahams, L., Pancorbo, G., Primi, R., Santos, D., Kyllonen, P., John, O. P., & De Fruyt, F. (2019) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000591 · Cited by 245
Appropriate criteria: key to effective rubrics
Brookhart, S. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00022 · Cited by 243
A critical review of the arguments against the use of rubrics
Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2020) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100329 · Cited by 191
Rubrics as a way of providing transparency in assessment
Jönsson, A. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.875117 · Cited by 180
Menoyo, M. Á. M. (2015) · Foro de Educación · doi:10.14516/fde.2015.013.019.004 · Cited by 147
Should You Fine-Tune BERT for Automated Essay Scoring?
Mayfield, E., & Black, A. W. (2020) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.bea-1.15 · Cited by 155
Panadero, E., Jönsson, A., Pinedo, L., & Fernández‐Castilla, B. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09823-4 · Cited by 247
Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice
Harvey, M., & Luzia, K. (2013) · Cited by 141
Fraile, J., Panadero, E., & Pardo, R. (2017) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003 · Cited by 139
Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry
Wang, W. (2013) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008 · Cited by 142
The Development and Test of the Public Speaking Competence Rubric
Schreiber, L. M., Paul, G. D., & Shibley, L. R. (2012) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.670709 · Cited by 119
Mind the gap! Students’ use of exemplars and detailed rubrics as formative assessment
Lipnevich, A. A., McCallen, L. N., Miles, K. P., & Smith, J. K. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9299-9 · Cited by 116
Gradescope: A Fast, Flexible, and Fair System for Scalable Assessment of Handwritten Work
Singh, A., Karayev, S., Gutowski, K., & Abbeel, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale · doi:10.1145/3051457.3051466 · Cited by 113
Cockett, A., & Jackson, C. (2018) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.022 · Cited by 110
Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation
Laveault, D., Allal, L., & Publishing, S. I. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0 · Cited by 105
Exploring the Impact of Assessment on Medical Students’ Learning
Preston, R., Gratani, M., Owens, K., Roche, P., Zimanyi, M. A., & Malau‐Aduli, B. S. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1614145 · Cited by 120
Wang, W. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1261993 · Cited by 114
Beyond Fairness and Consistency in Grading: The Role of Rubrics in Higher Education
Ragupathi, K., & Lee, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1628-3_3 · Cited by 93
Bosman, L., & Fernhaber, S. A. (2018) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9010007 · Cited by 88
Using the analytic rubric as an evaluation tool in nursing education: The positive and the negative
Shipman, D., Roa, M., Hooten, J., & Wang, Z. J. (2011) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.007 · Cited by 87
Can a rubric do more than be transparent? Invitation as a new metaphor for assessment criteria
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1637842 · Cited by 85
Córdova, K. E. G. (2020) · Problems of Education in the 21st Century · doi:10.33225/pec/20.78.61 · Cited by 93
Bayerlein, L. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.870531 · Cited by 80
Hendry, G. D., Armstrong, S. J., & Bromberger, N. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.515014 · Cited by 82
Entrepreneurial competences in a higher education business plan course
Ferreras-Garcia, R., Hernández‐Lara, A. B., & Serradell-López, E. (2019) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-04-2018-0090 · Cited by 76
Common Structural Design Features of Rubrics May Represent a Threat to Validity
Humphry, S. M., & Heldsinger, S. (2014) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x14542154 · Cited by 78
Understanding variations between student and teacher application of rubrics
Li, J., & Lindsey, P. (2015) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.003 · Cited by 72
Howitz, W. J., McKnelly, K. J., & Link, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00450 · Cited by 75
Chan, C. K. Y., & Luo, J. J. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1888074 · Cited by 87
Becker, A. (2016) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.05.002 · Cited by 72
Rakedzon, T., & Baram‐Tsabari, A. (2017) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.12.004 · Cited by 81
The Use and Design of Rubrics to Support Assessment for Learning
Jönsson, A., & Panadero, E. (2016) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3045-1_7 · Cited by 77
Panadero, E., Alonso‐Tapia, J., & Martínez, J. A. H. (2014) · Journal for the Study of Education and Development Infancia y Aprendizaje · doi:10.1080/02103702.2014.881655 · Cited by 69
Greenberg, K. P. (2015) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628315587618 · Cited by 68
Insights about large-scale online peer assessment from an analysis of an astronomy MOOC
Formánek, M., Wenger, M., Buxner, S., Impey, C., & Sonam, T. (2017) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.019 · Cited by 71
¿Cómo emplear las rúbricas para implementar una verdadera evaluación formativa?
Fraile, J., Pardo, R., & Panadero, E. (2017) · Revista Complutense de Educación · doi:10.5209/rced.51915 · Cited by 75
Balloo, K., Evans, C., Hughes, A., Zhu, X., & Winstone, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00069 · Cited by 74
Improving and evaluating reflective narratives: A rubric for higher education students
Alsina, ́., Ayllón, S., Colomer, J., Fernández‐Peña, R., Noell, J. F., Díaz, M. P. I., Burriel, M. P., & Serra, L. (2017) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.015 · Cited by 64
Giacumo, L. A., & Savenye, W. C. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09664-5 · Cited by 67
Equity Beyond Bias in Language Technologies for Education
Mayfield, E., Madaio, M., Prabhumoye, S., Gerritsen, D., McLaughlin, B., Dixon-Román, E., & Black, A. W. (2019) · Proceedings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4446 · Cited by 62
Hagan, A. K., Topçuoğlu, B. D., Gregory, M. E., Barton, H. A., & Schloss, P. D. (2020) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01680-20 · Cited by 62
Values in evaluation – The use of rubrics
Dickinson, P., & Adams, J. (2017) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.07.005 · Cited by 60
Zedelius, C. M., Mills, C., & Schooler, J. W. (2018) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-018-1137-1 · Cited by 67
Sadaf, A., Martin, F., & Ahlgrim‐Delzell, L. (2019) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v23i4.2009 · Cited by 60
Allil, K. (2024) · Journal of Marketing Analytics · doi:10.1057/s41270-023-00281-z · Cited by 57
Rubrics enhance accuracy and reduce cognitive load in self-assessment
Krebs, R., Rothstein, B., & Roelle, J. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09302-1 · Cited by 81
Supporting Peer Feedback on Learning Strategies: Effects on Self-Efficacy and Feedback Quality
Bürgermeister, A., Glogger‐Frey, I., & Saalbach, H. (2021) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/14757257211016604 · Cited by 71
Towards an empirically validated model for assessment of code quality
Stegeman, M., Barendsen, E., & Smetsers, S. (2014) · Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/2674683.2674702 · Cited by 56
Bartholomew, S. R., Strimel, G., & Yoshikawa, E. (2018) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-018-9442-7 · Cited by 56
Gupta, M. M., Jankie, S., Pancholi, S. S., Talukdar, D., Sahu, P. K., & Sa, B. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10120352 · Cited by 60
From “Seeing Through” to “Seeing With”: Assessment Criteria and the Myths of Transparency
Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00096 · Cited by 51
Siekmann, L., Parr, J. M., & Busse, V. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100672 · Cited by 51
Maor, R., Paz-Baruch, N., Grinshpan, N., Milman, A., Mevarech, Z. R., Levi, R., Shlomo, S., & Zion, M. (2023) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101425 · Cited by 91
Jansen, T., Höft, L., Bahr, L., Fleckenstein, J., Møller, J., Köller, O., & Meyer, J. (2024) · Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht · doi:10.2378/peu2024.art08d · Cited by 58
Tadesse, T., Manathunga, C. E., & Gillies, R. M. (2018) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.15.1.3 · Cited by 51
How to assess professional competencies in Education for Sustainability?
García, M. R., Pubill, M. J. I., & Riberaygua, M. F. (2017) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-03-2016-0055 · Cited by 50
Lara, F. G., & Uribarren-Berrueta, T. D. N. J. (2013) · Investigación en Educación Médica · doi:10.1016/s2007-5057(13)72684-x · Cited by 49
Nordrum, L., Evans, K., & Gustafsson, M. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.758229 · Cited by 64
La evaluación de competencias en Educación Superior mediante rúbricas: un caso práctico
Sanz, M. P. G. (2014) · Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.6018/reifop.17.1.198861 · Cited by 49
An experimental test: Using rubrics for reflective writing to develop reflection
Cheng, M., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.001 · Cited by 48
Cantaert, G. R., Pype, P. F., Valcke, M., & Lauwerier, E. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192214799 · Cited by 52
Taylor, B. L., Kisby, F., & Reedy, A. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2299330 · Cited by 47
Using calibrated exemplars in the teacher-assessment of writing: an empirical study
Heldsinger, S., & Humphry, S. M. (2013) · Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00131881.2013.825159 · Cited by 47
When rubrics aren’t enough: Exploring exemplars and student rubric co-construction
Bacchus, R., Colvin, E., Knight, E. B., & Ritter, L. (2019) · Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/15505170.2019.1627617 · Cited by 45
Ghaffar, M. A., Khairallah, M., & Salloum, S. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100468 · Cited by 45
Hoang, A.-D., Pham, H.-H., Nguyen, C. Y., Nguyen, L.-K.-N., Vuong, Q., Dam, M. Q., Tran, T., & Nguyen, T. (2020) · International Review of Education · doi:10.1007/s11159-020-09850-1 · Cited by 44
Performing standards: a critical perspective on the contemporary use of standards in assessment
Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. J. (2019) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1678579 · Cited by 43
Jones, L., Allen, B., Dunn, P. K., & Brooker, L. R. (2016) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2016.1177000 · Cited by 42
Validez y confiabilidad en la evaluación del aprendizaje mediante las metodologías activas
Medina-Díaz, M. D. R., & Carrión, A. L. V. (2020) · Alteridad · doi:10.17163/alt.v15n2.2020.10 · Cited by 104
The power of subjectivity in competency-based assessment
Virk, A., Joshi, A., Mahajan, R., & Singh, T. (2020) · Journal of Postgraduate Medicine · doi:10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_591_20 · Cited by 40
Students’ Perception of the Use of a Rubric and Peer Reviews in an Online Learning Environment
Mphahlele, L. (2022) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm15110503 · Cited by 45
Power, J., & Tanner, D. A. (2023) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2023.2185769 · Cited by 60
Alsina, ́., Ayllón, S., & Colomer, J. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1486391 · Cited by 39
Evaluating Student Learning Outcomes in Counselor Education
Minton, C. A. B., & Gibson, D. M. (2012) · Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1177/2150137812452561 · Cited by 38
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0329-x · Cited by 38
Seraj, M., Katterfeldt, E.-S., Bub, K., Autexier, S., & Drechsler, R. (2019) · Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/3364510.3364515 · Cited by 38
Students’ use of a rubric for research theses
Prins, F. J., de Kleijn, R. A. M., & van Tartwijk, J. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1085954 · Cited by 37
Zhang, Y., Chen, B.-L., Ge, J., Hung, C.-Y., & Mei, L. (2018) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1553187 · Cited by 34
Hung, Y.-J. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1584783 · Cited by 37
Digital Storytelling as a Tool for Fostering Reflection
Hamilton, A., Rubin, D. L., Tarrant, M. A., & Gleason, M. (2019) · Frontiers The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad · doi:10.36366/frontiers.v31i1.443 · Cited by 37
La investigación formativa en ambientes ubicuos y virtuales en Educación Superior
Velandia-Mesa, C., Pastor, F. J. S., & Martínez Segura, M. J. (2017) · Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva (Universidad de Huelva) · doi:10.3916/c51-2017-01 · Cited by 6
Sutter, T. S., Bozkır, A. S., Gehring, B., & Berlich, P. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207272 · Cited by 56
García-Ros, R. (2017) · Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology · doi:10.25115/ejrep.v9i25.1468 · Cited by 37
Assessment and Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature for the Higher Education Academy
Jackel, B., Pearce, J., Radloff, A., & Edwards, D. (2017) · ACEReSearch Repository (Australian Council for Educational Research) · Cited by 37
Hendry, G. D., & Anderson, J. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.703998 · Cited by 36
Lázaro-Carrascosa, C., Losada, I. H., Alonso, D. P., & Velázquez‐Iturbide, J. Á. (2021) · Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS) · doi:10.14201/eks.23617 · Cited by 36
Is group work beneficial for producing creative designs in STEM design education?
Han, J., Park, D., Hua, M., & Childs, P. (2021) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-021-09709-y · Cited by 36
eRubrics in cooperative assessment of learning at university
de la Serna, M. C., Angulo, J. S., & Torres, M. Z. R. (2014) · Comunicar · doi:10.3916/c43-2014-15 · Cited by 36
Stanford, C., Cole, R. S., Froyd, J. E., Friedrichsen, D., Khatri, R., & Henderson, C. (2015) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0034-3 · Cited by 36
Berrocoso, J. V., & Gómez, A. C. (2014) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2014.6415 · Cited by 43
Varela, J. L. M., & Giralt, E. G. (2015) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.998169 · Cited by 35
Ortíz, A. M. B., Uribe, Á. C., & Camacho, L. R. (2021) · Folios · doi:10.17227/folios.55-14163 · Cited by 47
McKevitt, C. (2016) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.13.1.2 · Cited by 34
Rubrics and formative assessment in K-12 education: A scoping review of literature
English, N., Robertson, P., Gillis, S., & Graham, L. E. (2022) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101964 · Cited by 54
Instructional Design Collaboration: A Professional Learning and Growth Experience
Brown, B., Eaton, S. E., Jacobsen, M., Roy, S., & Friesen, S. (2013) · doi:10.11575/prism/34910 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H.
- Affiliations
- ICFAI Business School (IN)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reddy, Y. Malini
- ORCID
- Andrade, Heidi
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-448
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2025828126
- Cited by
- 917
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 46.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University at Albany
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- rubrics, higher education assessment, academic performance, rater reliability, rubric validity, student perceptions, program evaluation, course improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review