The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of rubric use in higher education
Abstract
This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post‐secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
Citations
Cites
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 1×
“As with any form of assessment, the clarity of the language in a rubric is a matter of validity because an ambiguous rubric cannot be accurately or consistently interpreted by instructors, students or scorers (Payne 2003).”
BackgroundUsing Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning.
Andrade, H. G. (2000) · Educational leadership · Cited by 528
Self-citationScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Andrade, H. G. (2005) · College Teaching · doi:10.3200/ctch.53.1.27-31 · Cited by 436
Self-citationWhat's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics.
Popham, W. J. (1997) · Educational leadership · Cited by 346
Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2020) · doi:10.7275/g367-ye94 · Cited by 332
Self-citationStudent-Involved Classroom Assessment
Stiggins, R. J. (2000) · Cited by 288
Arter, J. A., & McTighe, J. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 262
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268 · Cited by 258
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Arter , J. and Chappuis , J. 2007 . Creating and recognizing quality rubrics , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall .
- 10.1177/016146810210400603 · DOI
- Lapsley , R. and Moody , R. 2007 . Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non‐traditional students . Journal of American Academy of Business , 12 ( 1 ) : 167 – 72 .
- Marzano , R.J. , Brandt , R.S. , Hughese , C.S. , Jones , B.F. , Presseisen , B.Z. , Stuart , C. and Shhor , C. 1998 . Dimensions of thinking , Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
- Powell , T.A. 2001 . Improving assessment and evaluation methods in film and television production courses PhD diss., Capella University. UMI No. 3034481
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 909
Using videos to improve oral presentation skills in distance learning engineering master's degrees
Galindo, C., Gregori, P., & Martínez, V. (2019) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2019.1662118 · Cited by 15
FOPA-MC: fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making for peer assessment
Capuano, N., Caballé, S., Percannella, G., & Ritrovato, P. (2020) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-020-05155-5 · Cited by 15
Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research in Evaluative Judgment
Khosravi, H., Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., Lodge, J. M., & Abdi, S. (2021) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2021.7206 · Cited by 16
Flores, G. D. L. C., & Hernández, L. F. A. (2014) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2014.6429 · Cited by 15
Evaluación de recursos tecnológicos didácticos mediante e-rúbricas
Barrera, A. G. (2016) · Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED) · doi:10.6018/red/49/13 · Cited by 15
Martens, K. S. R. (2018) · Evaluation Journal of Australasia · doi:10.1177/1035719x17753961 · Cited by 15
Teaching and learning in Saudi Arabia: perspectives from higher education
Sulaimani, A. (2016) · Asian Englishes · doi:10.1080/13488678.2016.1142706 · Cited by 15
An Assessment Framework for First-Year Introduction to Engineering Courses
Purzer, Ş., Douglas, K. A., Folkerts, J., & Williams, T. (2018) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--27552 · Cited by 14
Granbom, M. (2015) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2015.1028572 · Cited by 15
The Rubric: An Assessment Tool to Guide Students and Markers
Cox, G. C., Morrison, J., & Brathwaite, B. (2015) · International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd) · doi:10.4995/head15.2015.414 · Cited by 14
Applying a Thurstonian, Two-Stage Method in the Standardized Assessment of Writing
McGrane, J. A., Humphry, S. M., & Heldsinger, S. (2018) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2018.1495216 · Cited by 14
Thinwiangthong, S., Eddy, C. M., & Inprasitha, M. (2020) · Malaysian journal of learning & instruction · doi:10.32890/mjli2020.17.1.5 · Cited by 16
Rúbrica de evaluación. Usos y aprendizajes en un grupo de docentes universitarios
Kweksilber, C., & Trías, D. (2020) · Páginas de Educación · doi:10.22235/pe.v13i2.2234 · Cited by 14
Isusi-Fagoaga, R. M., & García-Aracil, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12239826 · Cited by 14
A Hybrid Virtual Cloud Learning Model During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Sorour, S. E., Kamel, T. M., & Abdelkader, H. E. (2021) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2021.014395 · Cited by 14
Greenberg, K. (2012) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/0098628311430643 · Cited by 18
Improvement of student confidence and competence through a self-care skills multi-course integration
Franz, T., Cailor, S. M., Chen, A. M. H., Thornton, P. L., & Norfolk, M. G. (2019) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2019.12.022 · Cited by 14
Competencies in business degrees: A face-to-face and online comparative study
Ferreras-Garcia, R., Ribas, C., Sales-Zaguirre, J., & Serradell-López, E. (2020) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2020.1751025 · Cited by 14
Teaching Assistants’ Experiences of Lab Sessions in Introductory Computer Science Courses
Riese, E. (2018) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie.2018.8659243 · Cited by 14
Developing an Opioid Curriculum for Medical Students: A Consensus Report from a National Symposium
Wallace, P. M., Warrier, S. S., Kahn, M. J., Welsh, C., & Fischer, M. (2019) · Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/08897077.2019.1635971 · Cited by 14
Assessing creative outcomes in studio-based learning: a comparative assessment of analytical rubrics
Abdellatif, R. A., & El-Wakeel, H. A. (2024) · International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation · doi:10.1080/21650349.2024.2426645 · Cited by 13
Rubric-based debriefing to enhance nursing students’ critical thinking via simulation
Wong, J. Y. H., Chan, M. M. K., Tsang, V. W. Y., Pang, M. T. H., Chan, C. K. Y., Chau, P. H., & Tiwari, A. (2020) · BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2019-000523 · Cited by 13
García-Ros, R., Ruescas-Nicolau, M.-A., Serrano, N. C., Carrasco, J. J., Pérez‐Alenda, S., Sastre-Arbona, C., Valenzuela, C. S. M., Flor-Rufino, C., & Sánchez-Sánchez, M. L. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18094957 · Cited by 13
Implementation of Specifications Grading in an Upper-Division Chemical Biology Lecture Course
Kelz, J. I., Uribe, J. L., Rasekh, M. F., Takahashi, G. R., Gibson, W. S., Link, R. D., McKnelly, K. J., & Martin, R. W. (2023) · The Biophysicist · doi:10.35459/tbp.2022.000239 · Cited by 13
Assessment rubrics: thinking inside the boxes
Bennett, C. (2016) · Learning and Teaching · doi:10.3167/latiss.2016.090104 · Cited by 17
Cobos, T. L., & González, M. C. (2021) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v25i1.8374 · Cited by 13
Learning together: A case study of a partnership to co-create assessment criteria
Smith, S., Akhyani, K., Axson, D., Arnautu, A., & Stanimirova, I. (2021) · International Journal for Students as Partners · doi:10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4647 · Cited by 13
Supervisors’ untrained postgraduate rubric use for formative and summative purposes
Postmes, L., Bouwmeester, R. A. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., & van der Schaaf, M. F. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.2021390 · Cited by 15
Huang, Y., & Gui, M. (2014) · Journal of Education and Training Studies · doi:10.11114/jets.v3i3.753 · Cited by 13
Think Before (and After) You Speak: Practice and Self-Reflection Bolster Oral Communication Skills
Sterling, E. J., Bravo, A., Porzecanski, A. L., Burks, R. L., Linder, J. M., Langen, T. A., Fernández, D. S., Ruby, D., & Bynum, N. (2016) · The journal of college science teaching · doi:10.2505/4/jcst16_045_06_87 · Cited by 13
Developing Communication Management Skills
Cyphert, D., Dodge, E. N., & Duclos, L. K. (2016) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/2329490616660815 · Cited by 13
Holmstedt, P., Jönsson, A., & Aspelin, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00054 · Cited by 15
Writing Matrix and Assessing Literature Review: A Methodological Element of a Scientific Project
Murniarti, E., Nainggolan, B., Panjaitan, H., Pandiangan, L. E. A., Widyani, I. D. A., & Dakhi, S. (2018) · Journal of Asian Development · doi:10.5296/jad.v4i2.13895 · Cited by 13
Carson, J. T. (2019) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2019.1602762 · Cited by 14
Representational transformations: Using maps to write essays
Binks, A., Toniolo, A., & Nacenta, M. A. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2022.102851 · Cited by 12
“…Prosser and Webb, 1994; Smith et al., 1999) and (2) how to measure the quality of their essay outcomes (Biggs, 1988; Lavelle and Zuercher, 2001; Reddy and Andrade, 2010) Hayes and Flower (1987) identify that writers use three major processes: planning, where writers generate and organise…”
BackgroundEffects of rubric quality on marker variation in higher education
Chakraborty, S., Dann, C. E., Mandal, A., Dann, B., Paul, M., & Hafeez‐Baig, A. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100997 · Cited by 12
Zhao, K., Zhou, J., & Dawson, P. (2021) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2021.1908225 · Cited by 12
Using qualitative comparative analysis approach in tourism studies: a critical review
Selçuk, O., & Çızel, B. (2023) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-023-01675-y · Cited by 13
Rubric Development and Validation for Assessing Tasks' Solving via AI Chatbots
Hmoud, M., Swaity, H., Anjass, E., & Ramírez, E. M. A. (2024) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · doi:10.34190/ejel.22.6.3292 · Cited by 18
Closing the Circle: Use of Students’ Responses for Peer-Assessment Rubric Improvement
Song, Y., Hu, Z., & Gehringer, E. F. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25515-6_3 · Cited by 12
Allen, W. J., Grant, A., Earl, L., MacLellan, R., Waipara, N. W., Mark‐Shadbolt, M., Ogilvie, S., Langer, E. R., & Marzano, M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-76956-1_11 · Cited by 12
Villa, K. R., Sprunger, T. L., Walton, A. M., Costello, T. J., & Isaacs, A. N. (2020) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe7648 · Cited by 12
Jones, P. A. (2020) · Journal of Public Affairs Education · doi:10.1080/15236803.2020.1773713 · Cited by 12
Validación de una rúbrica para la evaluación de trabajos fin de máster
Muñoz‐Repiso, A. G., Martín, A. H., del Pozo, M. M., & Migueláñéz, S. O. (2020) · Profesorado Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.30827/profesorado.v24i2.15151 · Cited by 12
Smith, J. S. (2016) · Journalism & Mass Communication Educator · doi:10.1177/1077695816648866 · Cited by 12
Ruiz-Terroba, R., Cano, E. V., & Sevillano-García, M. L. (2017) · Ocnos Revista de Estudios sobre Lectura · doi:10.18239/ocnos_2017.16.2.1349 · Cited by 12
Yuan, M., & Recker, M. M. (2018) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-018-9605-y · Cited by 18
ODNI as an analytic ombudsman: is Intelligence Community Directive 203 up to the task?
Marcoci, A., Vercammen, A., & Burgman, M. A. (2018) · Intelligence & National Security · doi:10.1080/02684527.2018.1546265 · Cited by 12
Bruna, C., Villarroel, V., Bruna, D., & Martínez, J. A. (2019) · Formación universitaria · doi:10.4067/s0718-50062019000200017 · Cited by 12
Ghanbari, N., & Barati, H. (2020) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-020-00112-3 · Cited by 12
Porzecanski, A. L., Bravo, A., Groom, M. J., Dávalos, L. M., Bynum, N., Abraham, B. J., Cigliano, J. A., Griffiths, C. S., Stokes, D. L., Cawthorn, M., et al. (2021) · Case Studies in the Environment · doi:10.1525/cse.2021.1536396 · Cited by 12
Evaluation of electronic SOAP note grading and feedback
Barnett, S. G., Gallimore, C. E., Kopacek, K. J., & Porter, A. L. (2014) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2014.04.010 · Cited by 12
Kinne, L. J., Hasenbank, J., & Coffey, D. (2014) · Cited by 12
Using AI to generate formative feedback in doctoral education
Tensen, D., Grainger, P., & Graham, W. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2536558 · Cited by 19
Ahmed, M. M., Rahman, A., Hossain, M. K., & Tambi, F. B. (2022) · AAOU Journal/AAOU journal · doi:10.1108/aaouj-05-2022-0064 · Cited by 11
Democratising assessment rubrics for international students
Gonsalves, C. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2281237 · Cited by 11
Radović, S., & Seidel, N. (2025) · Innovative Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10755-024-09771-z · Cited by 16
How Consistent Are Humans When Grading Programming Assignments?
Messer, M., Brown, N. C. C., Kölling, M., & Shi, M. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3759256 · Cited by 16
Carmenado, I. D. L. R., Sastre-Merino, S., Jiménez, C. F., Rio, M. C. N. D., Reyes, E., & García-Arjona, N. (2016) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.192 · Cited by 11
Students' motivation for rubric use in the EFL classroom assessment environment
He, C., Zeng, J., & Chen, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895952 · Cited by 14
Designing and validating an assessment rubric for writing emails in English as a foreign language
Keller, S., Trüb, R., Raubach, E. E., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., & Fleckenstein, J. (2023) · Research in Subject-matter Teaching and Learning (RISTAL) · doi:10.2478/ristal-2023-0002 · Cited by 11
Impacto de una rúbrica electrónica de argumentación científica en la metodología blended-learning
Robles, D. C., de la Serna, M. C., Arrufat, M. J. G., & Contreras, J. Q. (2017) · RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia · doi:10.5944/ried.21.1.18827 · Cited by 11
Expósito‐Langa, M., Nicolau-Juliá, D., & Tomás‐Miquel, J. (2017) · Revista Complutense de Educación · doi:10.5209/rced.51618 · Cited by 11
How program evaluators use and learn to use rubrics to make evaluative reasoning explicit
Martens, K. S. R. (2018) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.03.006 · Cited by 11
Grader Consistency in using Standards-based Rubrics
Hicks, N., & Diefes‐Dux, H. A. (2018) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--28416 · Cited by 11
Yusri, R., Muspardi, M., Kemal, E., & Rahmat, W. (2019) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042129 · Cited by 11
Clement, L., Dorman, J. B., & McGee, R. (2020) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.19-11-0235 · Cited by 12
Torres, M. J. A., Contero, M., & Camba, J. D. (2021) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-020-09651-5 · Cited by 12
Angell, K. (2015) · Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian · doi:10.1080/01639269.2015.996481 · Cited by 12
Evaluating standards-based assessment rubrics in a postgraduate public health subject
Kite, J., & Phongsavan, P. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1199773 · Cited by 12
LUPDA: a comprehensive rubrics-based assessment model for STEAM education
Cheng, Y., & Huang, Y. (2025) · International Journal of STEM Education · doi:10.1186/s40594-025-00570-2 · Cited by 15
Connecting Native Students to STEM Research Using Virtual Archaeology
Cannon, M. B., Cohen, A. S., & Jimenez, K. N. (2021) · Advances in Archaeological Practice · doi:10.1017/aap.2021.2 · Cited by 10
Corbella, L., Oliva, C. T., Moriche, M. P. R., & Úcar, X. (2021) · Revista Española de Pedagogía · doi:10.22550/rep79-3-2021-05 · Cited by 10
Tadesse, T., Chalachew, A. A., Getachew, K., Ferede, B., Tarekegne, W. M., Siebeck, M., & Fischer, M. R. (2022) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci12070468 · Cited by 10
Rubrics - Sharing the Rules of the Game
Balch, D., Blanck, R., & Balch, D. H. (2016) · Journal of Instructional Research · doi:10.9743/jir.2016.4 · Cited by 10
Miñambres, P. R., Rico, A., de Robles, A. L. D. S. L., & Gorostiza, A. I. U. (2018) · Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado · doi:10.6018/reifop.21.2.315011 · Cited by 10
Delineando criterios para la evaluación de tecnología educativa
Noriega, I. D. P., Rojas, I. E. E., Segura-Azuara, N. D. L. Á., Hambleton-Fuentes, A., & Cabrera, M. V. L. (2018) · Educación Médica · doi:10.1016/j.edumed.2018.04.020 · Cited by 10
Schuller, K. A., Cronin, C. E., Nicks, S. E., Jing, X., Kingori, C., & Morrone, M. (2019) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.02.013 · Cited by 10
Validation of a reflection rubric for higher education
Rogers, J., Peecksen, S., Douglas, M. E., & Simmons, M. (2019) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2019.1676712 · Cited by 12
Rubric as a learning tool in teaching application of derivatives in basic calculus
Auxtero, L. C., & Callaman, R. A. (2020) · JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) · doi:10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11449 · Cited by 10
ASSESSMENT RUBRIC FOR RESEARCH REPORT WRITING: A TOOL FOR SUPERVISION
Bukhari, N., Jamal, J. B., Ismail, A., & Shamsuddin, J. B. (2021) · Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction · doi:10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.1 · Cited by 10
Tinoco-Giraldo, H., Sánchez, E. M. T., & García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14074025 · Cited by 10
Peer assessment of language learning resources in virtual learning environments with e-rubrics
Martín-Monje, E., Cano, E. V., & Álvarez, M. F. (2014) · International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1504/ijtel.2014.069018 · Cited by 10
Brignell, C., Wicks, T. J., Tomás, C., & Halls, J. G. (2019) · MSOR Connections · doi:10.21100/msor.v18i1.1019 · Cited by 13
Instruments to assess students’ critical thinking—A qualitative approach
Paul, J. A., Sinha, M., & Cochran, J. D. (2023) · Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education · doi:10.1111/dsji.12295 · Cited by 11
Developing a rubric for assessing students’ competencies in entrepreneurial-STEM learning context
Eltanahy, M., & Mansour, N. (2024) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2024.2311701 · Cited by 14
Radović, S., & Seidel, N. (2024) · International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education · doi:10.21449/ijate.1502786 · Cited by 9
Filice, S., Tregunno, D., Edge, D. S., & Egan, R. G. (2020) · International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship · doi:10.1515/ijnes-2019-0056 · Cited by 9
Language assessment in EMI: unravelling the implicit-explicit dichotomy
Gronchi, M. (2023) · Educational Linguistics · doi:10.1515/eduling-2023-0011 · Cited by 9
Adapting Existing Assessment Tools For Use in Assessing Engineering Graduate Attributes
Chong, A., & Romkey, L. (2012) · Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4644 · Cited by 9
Torres, M., Sousa, A. J., & Torres, R. T. (2017) · International Journal of Technology and Design Education · doi:10.1007/s10798-017-9399-y · Cited by 9
Exploring Deliberate Practice & the Use of Skill Sheets in the Collegiate Leadership Competition
Allen, S. J., Jenkins, D. M., & Krizanovic, B. (2018) · Journal of Leadership Education · doi:10.12806/v17/i1/c3 · Cited by 9
La huerta escolar como estrategia pedagógica para fortalecer el aprendizaje
Quintero, Y. Z. (2018) · Cultura Educación y Sociedad · doi:10.17981/cultedusoc.9.3.2018.53 · Cited by 9
Rubric Reliability and Annotation of Content and Argument in Source-Based Argument Essays
Gao, Y., Driban, A., McManus, B. X., Musi, E., Davies, P., Muresan, S., & Passonneau, R. J. (2019) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4452 · Cited by 9
Gortney, J. S., Lahiri, M., Giuliano, C., Saleem, H., Khan, M., Salinitri, F. D., & Lucarotti, R. L. (2020) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe8201 · Cited by 10
Ergüleç, F., Kara, A., & Eren, E. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03136-5 · Cited by 11
Hodgson, Y., Cant, R., Tighe, J., & Garvey, L. (2022) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2022.2061842 · Cited by 9
Lombard, B. J. J. (2011) · The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa · Cited by 9
Villasol, C. D. L. I. (2020) · Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa · doi:10.15366/riee2020.13.1.003 · Cited by 9
Bradley, E. J., Anderson, S., & Eagle, L. (2020) · Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education · doi:10.47408/jldhe.vi18.557 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H.
- Affiliations
- ICFAI Business School (IN)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reddy, Y. Malini
- ORCID
- Andrade, Heidi
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-448
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2025828126
- Cited by
- 917
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 46.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University at Albany
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- rubrics, higher education assessment, academic performance, rater reliability, rubric validity, student perceptions, program evaluation, course improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review