The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of rubric use in higher education
Abstract
This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post‐secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
Citations
Cites
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 1×
“As with any form of assessment, the clarity of the language in a rubric is a matter of validity because an ambiguous rubric cannot be accurately or consistently interpreted by instructors, students or scorers (Payne 2003).”
BackgroundUsing Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning.
Andrade, H. G. (2000) · Educational leadership · Cited by 528
Self-citationScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Andrade, H. G. (2005) · College Teaching · doi:10.3200/ctch.53.1.27-31 · Cited by 436
Self-citationWhat's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics.
Popham, W. J. (1997) · Educational leadership · Cited by 346
Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2020) · doi:10.7275/g367-ye94 · Cited by 332
Self-citationStudent-Involved Classroom Assessment
Stiggins, R. J. (2000) · Cited by 288
Arter, J. A., & McTighe, J. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 262
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268 · Cited by 258
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Arter , J. and Chappuis , J. 2007 . Creating and recognizing quality rubrics , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall .
- 10.1177/016146810210400603 · DOI
- Lapsley , R. and Moody , R. 2007 . Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non‐traditional students . Journal of American Academy of Business , 12 ( 1 ) : 167 – 72 .
- Marzano , R.J. , Brandt , R.S. , Hughese , C.S. , Jones , B.F. , Presseisen , B.Z. , Stuart , C. and Shhor , C. 1998 . Dimensions of thinking , Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
- Powell , T.A. 2001 . Improving assessment and evaluation methods in film and television production courses PhD diss., Capella University. UMI No. 3034481
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 909
Selvik, J. T., Abrahamsen, E. B., Jimarkon, P., & Marshall, T. J. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00567-7 · Cited by 1
Rosmawati, E., Apriliya, S., & Muslihin, H. Y. (2025) · Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education · doi:10.56916/jirpe.v4i3.1371 · Cited by 1
Role of Adaptable Rubrics in Modern Education: A Systematic Review
Gupta, P., & Mehrotra, D. (2025) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-5066-8_23 · Cited by 1
Gondivkar, S. M., Panchbhai, A., Gadbail, A. R., & Gaikwad, R. N. (2025) · The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3853 · Cited by 1
Schuster, C., Evangelou, D., Krebs, R., Mierwald, M., Brauch, N., & Stadtler, M. (2026) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102842 · Cited by 2
Massara, G. V., Ryan, C. B., & Mallia, M. E. (2026) · International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/ijshe-02-2025-0116 · Cited by 1
Simulations for Leader Development
Hunter, L. G. H. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83708-544-620251032 · Cited by 1
Black, R. E., & Schafer, A. E. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6c00269 · Cited by 1
Adewuyi, H. O. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16050781 · Cited by 1
Enabling Future-Ready Tertiary Institutions Through MIS Effectiveness Framework
Ahsan, A., Waheed, L., Davison, C., & Sharma, R. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14070820 · Cited by 1
Jansen, T., Bahr, J. L., Schaller, N.-J., Höft, L., & Meyer, J. (2026) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2026.102969 · Cited by 2
Villalón, J., Beghelli, A., & Merino, J. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2016.36 · Cited by 1
Læring med videoteknologi – peer feedback og videosupervision
Lauridsen, H. H., Nørgaard, C., & Toftegaard, R. C. (2016) · Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM) · doi:10.7146/lom.v9i16.24373 · Cited by 1
Going beyond ‘good enough’ teaching in psychiatric training
Sarkar, S. N., & Young, A. H. (2017) · BJPsych Advances · doi:10.1192/apt.bp.115.015107 · Cited by 1
Estrategias de evaluación para las competencias transversales CT-02, CT-04 y CT-06
Pérez, C. E., Baviera‐Puig, A., & Vera, J. M. B. (2017) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2017.2017.6669 · Cited by 1
Student Engagement with Rubrics to Promote Enhanced Written Communication of Health Information
Kedrowicz, A. A., Hammond, S., & Dorman, D. C. (2018) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-018-0608-4 · Cited by 1
Soe, M. T. M., Shultz, R. B., Muscarella, J., Ward, J., & Fontecchio, A. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--29911 · Cited by 1
A B or not a B? A Proposed Framework for Discussing Grade Aggregation in Standards-Based Assessment
Hylton, J. B., & Walker, M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--29655 · Cited by 1
GRADO DE ACEPTACIÓN DE LOS ESTUDIANTES DEL USO DE LA PRENSA COMO HERRAMIENTA DE APRENDIZAJE ACTIVO
Gil, I. P., Guillén, A. M., Orden‐Cruz, C., & Díaz-Iglesias, S. (2019) · Journal of Management and Business Education · doi:10.35564/jmbe.2019.0009 · Cited by 1
de Oliveira, T., Stringhini, D., Craibas, J. J. S., & Corrêa, D. G. M. (2019) · RENOTE · doi:10.22456/1679-1916.95702 · Cited by 1
da Silva, J. Z., & Gallon, M. D. S. (2019) · Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada · doi:10.1590/010318138653931450692 · Cited by 1
DISRUPTIVE TIMES AND HIGHER EDUCATION IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT: IMPORTANCE OF DUAL ASSESSMENT
Hanžek, M., Biočina, Z., Martinović, M., & Pirić, V. (2021) · International Scientific Conference EMAN. Economics & Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times · doi:10.31410/eman.2021.215 · Cited by 1
Creating Electronic Portfolio Rubrics for General Education Course Assessments in Thailand
Rattiya, M. P., Nakazawa, M., Panichying, T., & Bunjongparu, N. (2022) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.4.1621 · Cited by 1
al-Tonsi, H. G. A. L. (2021) · مجلة دراسات في المناهج وطرق التدريس · doi:10.21608/mjat.2021.229427 · Cited by 1
Using Criteria-Based Assessment Rubrics for Online Marking: Technological and Pedagogical Challenges
Boudamoussi, S. E. (2022) · Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice · doi:10.33423/jhetp.v22i8.5316 · Cited by 1
Exploring the impact of the rubric on peer feedback content quality in online learning
Li, X., Zhou, X., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1145/3543321.3543344 · Cited by 1
Evaluación de competencias en estudiantes universitarios
Rodríguez, C. L., Soto, D. Y. S., Martínez, I. O., & Depraect, N. E. Z. (2022) · South Florida Journal of Development · doi:10.46932/sfjdv3n4-105 · Cited by 1
Farsani, M. A., Abdollahzadeh, E., & Hashemi, B. S. M. (2023) · The Journal of AsiaTEFL · doi:10.18823/asiatefl.2023.20.2.3.261 · Cited by 1
The Enhancement of Prospective Teachers’ Competence and Awareness in the Understanding by Design
Akbaş, O., & BAŞARAN, O. (2023) · Participatory Educational Research · doi:10.17275/per.23.83.10.5 · Cited by 1
Othman, R., & Awang, M. I. (2019) · Journal of Educational System · doi:10.22259/2637-5877.0302008 · Cited by 1
Zahid, M., Anwar, M. N., & Azim, M. U. (2023) · Journal of Development and Social Sciences · doi:10.47205/jdss.2023(4-iv)54 · Cited by 1
Denend, L., Venook, R. D., Pamnani, R. D., Sheth, K. R., & Towles, J. D. (2024) · Biomedical Engineering Education · doi:10.1007/s43683-024-00153-7 · Cited by 1
Tan, T. H., & Tan, W. H. E. (2024) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101402 · Cited by 1
Cesari, A. B., Chiappero, J., Paulucci, N. S., & Yslas, E. I. (2024) · Journal of Biological Education · doi:10.1080/00219266.2024.2386258 · Cited by 1
Assessing Student Writing in an Undergraduate Psychology Research Methods Course
Penalver, R. M., Mazariegos, C., Parker, K., & Dyer-Seymour, J. (2025) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00986283251357559 · Cited by 1
Students' problem-solving skills in-depth: ready for ‘real life’?
Calma, A. (2025) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101267 · Cited by 7
Aburumman, L. S. M., & Alkhawaldeh, A. H. (2024) · International Journal of Humanities and Social Science · doi:10.30845/ijhss.v14p24 · Cited by 1
Assessing What Matters in Civics: A Practical and Credible Tool for Student-Led Civics Projects
Nam, C., Kidd, D., & Block, L. (2026) · The Social Studies · doi:10.1080/00377996.2025.2574880 · Cited by 2
A Rubric to Evaluate and Enhance Requirements Elicitation Interviewing Skills
Lending, D., Ezell, J. D., Dillon, T. W., & May, J. (2022) · Journal of Information Systems Education · doi:10.62273/ytnl5269 · Cited by 1
Cohall, D., & Skeete, D. H.-A. (2014) · Cited by 1
Roche, C. (2014) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy2020175 · Cited by 1
Kim, J., 정세영, 구자현, & Kim, J.-H. (2011) · The Journal of Special Children Education · doi:10.21075/kacsn.2011.13.4.513 · Cited by 1
Martín-Gómez, S., & Lorenzo, C. M. (2017) · Revista Tecnología Ciencia y Educación · doi:10.51302/tce.2017.156 · Cited by 1
Continuous assessment as a tool for deeper learning
Pietikäinen, P., & Karinen, R. S. (2016) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.17020843 · Cited by 1
Gorjipour, H., & Hoseinpoor, M. (2018) · International Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.5430/ijelt.v6n1p20 · Cited by 1
Juaristi, M. R. B., Guridi, M. Y. F. D. A., Guridi, A. F. D. A., Ortega, J. A. R., Diaz, M. A., Arana, B. L., Izaga, E. M. D. M., Martín, R. H., Olaechea, M. I., Martínez, A. S., et al. (2018) · REDU Revista de Docencia Universitaria · doi:10.4995/redu.2018.9847 · Cited by 1
¿Implicar a los estudiantes en la modificación de rúbricas influye sobre su percepción de validez?
Priego‐Quesada, J. I., Requena-Bueno, L., Jimenez‐Perez, I., & García-Ros, R. (2019) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2019.2019.10416 · Cited by 1
Las rúbricas como herramienta de mejora del aprendizaje de la Termodinámica Técnica
Peña, B. (2019) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2019.2019.10349 · Cited by 1
A Practical and Systemic Curricular Approach to Teach Computer Systems
de Oliveira, T., Stringhini, D., & Craibas, J. J. S. (2019) · IEEE Latin America Transactions · doi:10.1109/tla.2019.8932345 · Cited by 1
Abdullah, A., & Ak, A. (2020) · IIUM Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.31436/ijes.v7i1.234 · Cited by 1
Breaking down Silos through Authentic Assessment: a Live Case Analysis
Freeman, O., Hand, R., & Kennedy, A. (2020) · International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd) · doi:10.4995/head20.2020.11150 · Cited by 2
Jagten på den gode opgave: Identifikation af kriterier og implementering af peer feedback i praksis
Jensen, L. M., Burmølle, M., Johannsen, B. F., Bruun, J., & Ellegaard, M. (2020) · Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift · doi:10.7146/dut.v15i28.115204 · Cited by 1
Pham, N. T. T. (2021) · Vietnam Journal of Education (online)/Vietnam Journal of Education/Giáo dục · doi:10.52296/vje.2021.45 · Cited by 1
Matsumoto, H., Amagai, K., Yuminaka, Y., & Sampson, R. J. (2021) · Asean Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.11113/ajee2020.4n1.17 · Cited by 1
Online-based Rubric for Peer Assessment: Effectiveness and Implications
Lee, K. Y., Hassell, D. G., Salleh, S. M., & Munohsamy, T. (2021) · SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning) · doi:10.35307/saltel.v4i2.76 · Cited by 1
Scalable and Practical Interventions Faculty Can Deploy to Increase Student Success
Hempel, B., Blowers, P., & Kiehlbaugh, K. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--33252 · Cited by 1
Usabilidad y satisfacción del uso de e-Rúbricas en la Actividad Tutorial del Área de Urgencias
Alvarado, V. A. I., & Romera, D. D. M. (2021) · Revista Practicum · doi:10.24310/revpracticumrep.v6i2.12615 · Cited by 1
Basic Principles and Procedures for Effective Teaching in Psychology
Bernstein, D. A. (2022) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26248-8_55-1 · Cited by 1
Basic Principles and Procedures for Effective Teaching in Psychology
Bernstein, D. A. (2022) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28745-0_55 · Cited by 1
affordances of rubrics in L2 writing in Higher Education
Garcés-Manzanera, A. (2022) · HUMAN REVIEW International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades · doi:10.37467/revhuman.v11.4086 · Cited by 1
Ducasse, A. M., Brown, A., & ACER (2020) · Studies in Language Assessment · doi:10.58379/jwid1797 · Cited by 1
Oyama, H., Nabeshima, Y., Morimoto, K., & Sugimura, Y. (2023) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.21763 · Cited by 1
Hallström, H. (2023) · Studies in science and technology education · doi:10.3384/9789180753418
English as a medium of instruction for engineering e-portfolio
Polyakova, O., Sanchís, E. J., & Galstyan-Sargsyan, R. (2023) · Revista EntreLinguas · doi:10.29051/el.v9i00.17053
Effect of Alternative Assessments on Behavior of Students in a Secondary Art Classroom
Carper, K. J. (2012) · Cited by 1
Streff, R. J. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 1
Modelo de Avaliação do Aprendizado de Metacompetências (MAAM) em cursos de Engenharias
Tiziotto, S. A. (2018) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.18.2018.tde-17072018-092243 · Cited by 1
de Oliveira, T., Stringhini, D., Craibas, J. J. S., & Corrêa, D. G. M. (2018) · Anais do ... Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação/Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação · doi:10.5753/cbie.sbie.2018.1603 · Cited by 1
A Quantitative Assessment of Rubrics Using a Soft Computing ApproachPreprint
Bhattacharyya, S., De, S., Mršić, L., Pan, I., Muhammad, K., Mukherjee, A., & Konar, D. (2022) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202210.0197.v1 · Cited by 1
Cantaert, G. R., Pype, P. F., & Lauwerier, E. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3296691/v1 · Cited by 2
Writing with AI at the Margins: Student Voice and Authenticity at a Minority-Serving InstitutionPreprint
Chick, J. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8427622/v1 · Cited by 3
Li, J. (2012) · Research Commons (University of Waikato) · Cited by 1
Tabares, R. C., Valencia, J. H., Mesa, O. R. M., & Portilla, M. G. P. (2014) · Horizontes Pedagógicos · doi:10.33881/0123-8264.16107
Interdisciplinary Teaching Strategy in the Development of Chemical Courses
Romero‐Ceronio, N., Lobato-García, C. E., Gómez‐Rivera, A., Gallegos‐García, A. J., & Velázquez-Oropeza, D. J. (2015) · Journal of Laboratory Chemical Education
Engaging design students through a video-based tutorial system
Francis, R. L., & McCarthy, J. (2011) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)
Assessment in higher education: exploring the gap between standards and idiosyncracies
Ekbrand, H., Gunnarsson, A., Jansson, M., & Carle, J. (2014)
WHAT PROPERTY STUDENTS MAY LEARN FROM PLAYING GAMES
Boyd, S. (2013)
Pérez, M. P. S., Alonso, M. A. F., & Esteban, M. A. R. (2015) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)
Ibrahim, K. A., Ahmad, A., & Amran, A. C. (2014) · Malaysia University Conference Engineering Technology
The nature of written feedback: A study of postgraduate lecturers' perspectives
Edlin, A. (2011) · Unitec Research Bank (Unitec Institute of Technology)
Action research on beginners university teachers training program through a rubric
Guerra-Martín, M. D., Lima‐Serrano, M., Pórcel‐Gálvez, A. M., León-Larios, F., & González‐López, J. R. (2015) · Educación Médica Superior
Designing a Faculty Development Program for the Effective Use of Analytic Grading Rubrics
Phillips, C., & Choudhury, R. (2014) · Sigma Theta Tau International's 25th International Nursing Research Congress
Grading Rubrics: What's in it for Faculty?
Phillips, C., & Choudhury, R. (2014) · STTI/NLN Nursing Education Research Conference
Toprak, A. (2015) · QSpace (Queen's University Library)
Aplicació de rúbriques per a l’avaluació dels alumnes en el laboratori químic
Gonell, F., Gonell, S., Julián‐López, B., & Mata, J. A. (2016) · Revista d Innovació Docent Universitària · doi:10.1344/ridu2016.8.2
Perceptions of Business School Students About Character Development and Ethical Reasoning
Mays, L. (2016) · ScholarWorks (Walden University)
Diseño de una rúbrica para evaluar trabajos en grupo: revisión y reflexión.
Mauricio, M. D., Eva, S., Vallés, S. L., Aldasoro, M., & Vila, J. M. (2016) · Congreso de Innovación Educativa y Docencia en Red (IN-RED) · doi:10.4995/inred2016.2016.4291
Understanding Strategies of Teacher-Student Interaction
Kille, T. L. (2016) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9995-3.ch011
Using a Distributed Learning Environment Model to Foster Learner-Educator Interaction
Havice, P. A., & Havice, W. L. (2014) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6461-6.ch015
Integration of a Community Assessment Project (CAP) into an AT Course
Loftspring, R. (2011) · International Journal of Athletic Therapy & Training · doi:10.1123/ijatt.16.1.32
Santhiyagu, A. S. (2016) · IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science · doi:10.9790/0837-210705100108
Color-coding rubrics for increased effectiveness
Schofield, S. (2015) · doi:10.31274/itaa_proceedings-180814-1163
Analysis of the use and design of rubrics in competency assessment in engineering degrees
Leticia-Concepción, Velasco-Martínez, Juan-Carlos, & Hurtado, J. C. T. (2016) · Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21) · doi:10.1145/3012430.3012514
Peer evaluation rubric criteria developed by university students for problem-based learning
Han, S. I. (2017) · International Journal of Current Advanced Research · doi:10.24327/ijcar.2017.2464.0028
Singleton, M. (2016) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)
Strategies to assess generic skills for different types of students
Baviera‐Puig, A., Pérez, C. E., & Vera, J. M. B. (2017) · International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd) · doi:10.4995/head17.2017.4797
Rubrics for Performance Assessment: Examples for Writing
Yetiş, V. A. (2017) · Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.19171/uefad.369223
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H.
- Affiliations
- ICFAI Business School (IN)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reddy, Y. Malini
- ORCID
- Andrade, Heidi
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-448
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2025828126
- Cited by
- 917
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 46.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University at Albany
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- rubrics, higher education assessment, academic performance, rater reliability, rubric validity, student perceptions, program evaluation, course improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review