CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 917Student Assessment and FeedbackEvaluation of Teaching PracticesEducational Assessment and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of rubric use in higher education

Reddy, Y. Malini, Andrade, Heidi·2010·Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
DOI 10.1080/02602930902862859
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post‐secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02602930902862859

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Arter , J. and Chappuis , J. 2007 . Creating and recognizing quality rubrics , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall .
  2. 10.1177/016146810210400603 · DOI
  3. Lapsley , R. and Moody , R. 2007 . Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non‐traditional students . Journal of American Academy of Business , 12 ( 1 ) : 167 – 72 .
  4. Marzano , R.J. , Brandt , R.S. , Hughese , C.S. , Jones , B.F. , Presseisen , B.Z. , Stuart , C. and Shhor , C. 1998 . Dimensions of thinking , Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
  5. Powell , T.A. 2001 . Improving assessment and evaluation methods in film and television production courses PhD diss., Capella University. UMI No. 3034481

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 909

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H.
Affiliations
  • ICFAI Business School (IN)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Reddy, Y. Malini
ORCID
Andrade, Heidi
Venue
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2009-08-07
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
435-448
ISSN
  • 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-297X
DOI
10.1080/02602930902862859
OpenAlex
W2025828126
Cited by
917
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
FWCI
46.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
University at Albany
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Keywords
rubrics, higher education assessment, academic performance, rater reliability, rubric validity, student perceptions, program evaluation, course improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review