The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of rubric use in higher education
Abstract
This paper critically reviews the empirical research on the use of rubrics at the post‐secondary level, identifies gaps in the literature and proposes areas in need of research. Studies of rubrics in higher education have been undertaken in a wide range of disciplines and for multiple purposes, including increasing student achievement, improving instruction and evaluating programmes. While, student perceptions of rubrics are generally positive and some authors report positive responses to rubric use by instructors, others noted a tendency for instructors to resist using them. Two studies suggested that rubric use was associated with improved academic performance, while one did not. The potential of rubrics to identify the need for improvements in courses and programmes has been demonstrated. Studies of the validity of rubrics have shown that clarity and appropriateness of language is a central concern. Studies of rater reliability tend to show that rubrics can lead to a relatively common interpretation of student performance. Suggestions for future research include the use of more rigorous research methods, more attention to validity and reliability, a closer focus on learning and research on rubric use in diverse educational contexts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sharing the rubrics with students can have the added benefit of enhancing learning by allowing for feedback and self-assessment (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Designing and using rubrics to grade assignments or tests can reduce inconsistencies and make grading written work more objective.”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
In the citing paper
“Perhaps most importantly, sharing grading rubrics with students can support them in identifying where their thinking has gone wrong and promote learning (Jonsson and Svingby, 2007; Reddy and Andrade, 2010).”
From Teaching More by Grading Less (or Differently) (2014) · cites this paper as Reddy and Andrade, 2010
Citations
Cites
The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002 · Cited by 1,509 · cited 1×
“As with any form of assessment, the clarity of the language in a rubric is a matter of validity because an ambiguous rubric cannot be accurately or consistently interpreted by instructors, students or scorers (Payne 2003).”
BackgroundUsing Rubrics To Promote Thinking and Learning.
Andrade, H. G. (2000) · Educational leadership · Cited by 528
Self-citationScoring Rubric Development: Validity and Reliability
Moskal, B., & Leydens, J. A. (2020) · Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/q7rm-gg74 · Cited by 502
Teaching With Rubrics: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Andrade, H. G. (2005) · College Teaching · doi:10.3200/ctch.53.1.27-31 · Cited by 436
Self-citationWhat's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics.
Popham, W. J. (1997) · Educational leadership · Cited by 346
Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment
Andrade, H., & Du, Y. (2020) · doi:10.7275/g367-ye94 · Cited by 332
Self-citationStudent-Involved Classroom Assessment
Stiggins, R. J. (2000) · Cited by 288
Arter, J. A., & McTighe, J. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 262
Hafner, J., & Hafner, P. (2003) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/0950069022000038268 · Cited by 258
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008) · Educational Measurement Issues and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x · Cited by 248
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Arter , J. and Chappuis , J. 2007 . Creating and recognizing quality rubrics , Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall .
- 10.1177/016146810210400603 · DOI
- Lapsley , R. and Moody , R. 2007 . Teaching tip: Structuring a rubric for online course discussions to assess both traditional and non‐traditional students . Journal of American Academy of Business , 12 ( 1 ) : 167 – 72 .
- Marzano , R.J. , Brandt , R.S. , Hughese , C.S. , Jones , B.F. , Presseisen , B.Z. , Stuart , C. and Shhor , C. 1998 . Dimensions of thinking , Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development .
- Powell , T.A. 2001 . Improving assessment and evaluation methods in film and television production courses PhD diss., Capella University. UMI No. 3034481
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 909
Rubric to Assess Evidence-Based Dialogue of Socio-Scientific Issues with LiteMap
Rocha, A. K. L. T., Rocha, A. B. L. T., & Okada, A. (2018) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97807-9_11 · Cited by 5
Raddawi, R., & Bilikozen, N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64104-1_9 · Cited by 5
Meyer-Beining, J. (2020) · Learning Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100368 · Cited by 5
Carmosino, M., & Minnes, M. (2020) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3328778.3366946 · Cited by 5
Janssen, F. J. J. M., & Tigelaar, D. E. H. (2018) · Educación Química · doi:10.1016/s0187-893x(17)30106-4 · Cited by 5
Poirier, T. I., Hecht, K. A., Lynch, J. C., Otsuka, A. S., Shafer, K., & Wilhelm, M. (2015) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2015.79.4.tb05900.x · Cited by 5
Marín, P. A., Gutiérrez, S. A. T., & Londoño, N. (2019) · Revista EIA · doi:10.24050/reia.v16i31.1059 · Cited by 5
A Preliminary Rubric Design to Evaluate Mixed Methods Research.
Burrows, T. J. (2013) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 5
A Mixed Methods Study on Evaluations of Virginia's STEM-Focused Governor's Schools
Stith, K. M. (2017) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 5
Implementing rubric co-construction in ESL writing teaching
Zhang, T., & Weng, Z. (2023) · ELT Journal · doi:10.1093/elt/ccad033 · Cited by 4
YILMAZ, F. N. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101413 · Cited by 4
Chong, C. T., Zhang, H., Guo, L., Qiu, Y., Valera-Medina, A., & Ng, J.-H. (2025) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2025.17.023 · Cited by 4
Assessing leadership development in groups and organizations
Martin, J. A., Weng, J. J., & Kliewer, B. W. (2022) · New Directions for Student Leadership · doi:10.1002/yd.20522 · Cited by 4
More pain, more gain? Extricating the effect of student involvement in rubric co-construction
Zhang, W., Li, Y., & Zhang, W. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2331177 · Cited by 4
Examining peer review network dynamics in higher education visual communication courses using ERGM
Dinh, L., Friedman, A., & Hawley, K. (2024) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100222 · Cited by 4
Utschig, T. T., Norback, J. S., & Bryan, J. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--22255 · Cited by 4
Alaamer, R. A. (2021) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v14n11p144 · Cited by 4
Khau, A. H., & Huynh, V. T. M. (2022) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-022-00174-5 · Cited by 4
Assessment, Assessment Rubrics and Feedback
Rajaram, K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-9201-8_9 · Cited by 6
A framework for Writing Rubrics to Support Linguistically Diverse Students
Dobbs, C. L., & Leider, C. M. (2021) · The English Journal · doi:10.58680/ej202131315 · Cited by 4
Zeeb, H., Bürgermeister, A., Saalbach, H., Renkl, A., & Glogger‐Frey, I. (2023) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-023-00184-z · Cited by 5
Designing Learning Tools: The Case of a Competence Assessment Tool
Mor, E., Guerrero‐Roldán, A., Hettiarachchi, E., & Sánchez, M. A. H. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_9 · Cited by 4
Pecka, S. L., Schmid, K. K., & Pozehl, B. (2014) · PubMed · Cited by 4
Evaluation of Course Curriculum and Teaching
Coyle, J. P., Carter, I., Campbell, D., & Talor, O. (2013) · Advances in higher education and professional development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-4458-8.ch017 · Cited by 5
Dura, S. M. (2016) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-78635-064-020161015 · Cited by 5
A Personalized Summative Model based on Learner’s Effort
Bañeres, D. (2017) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v12i06.7165 · Cited by 4
van Velzen, C., Volman, M. L. L., & Brekelmans, M. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01612-8_11 · Cited by 5
Grading and interim feedback processes for a case method course
Mu, F., & Hatch, J. E. (2019) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2019.1583160 · Cited by 4
Efforts to Improve Undergraduate Grader Consistency: A Qualitative Analysis
Hicks, N., & Douglas, K. A. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--30366 · Cited by 4
Exploring differences between international business undergraduates’ conceptual understanding
Ashley, S., Schaap, H., & de Bruijn, E. (2019) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1672642 · Cited by 5
Rickett, C., Joseph, S., Northcote, M. T., Christian, B., & Seddon, J. (2019) · TEXT · doi:10.52086/001c.23589 · Cited by 4
Brown, C. M., James, S. E., & Soroka, G. (2020) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2020.1716239 · Cited by 4
Nurhalimah, N., Husna, N., & Hidayat, D. N. (2020) · International Journal of Linguistics Literature and Culture · doi:10.21744/ijllc.v6n5.990 · Cited by 4
Analysis of Exertion with Relative Grading Mechanism in Academics Using Computational Technique
Dasari, N., Parihar, M., & Shaik, M. S. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/1099/1/012018 · Cited by 4
The Effects of Different Rater Training Procedures on ESL Essay Raters’ Rating Accuracy
Rethinasamy, S. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.s3.21 · Cited by 4
Reid, K., Chiavaroli, N. G., & Bilszta, J. L. C. (2022) · Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development · doi:10.1177/23821205221081813 · Cited by 4
Daw, M. I. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2134552 · Cited by 4
Mjenda, M., Mutarutinya, V., & Owiti, D. S. O. (2023) · International Journal of Education and Practice · doi:10.18488/61.v11i3.3434 · Cited by 4
Roslan, M. M. (2024) · UMRAN - International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies · doi:10.11113/umran2024.11n1.678 · Cited by 4
Tabares, R. C., Valencia, J. H., Mesa, O. R. M., & Portilla, M. G. P. (2014) · Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · Cited by 4
The Use of a Rubric as a Tool to Guide Pre-Service Teachers in the Development of IEPs
Rosas, C. E., & Winterman, K. G. (2012) · Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals · doi:10.64546/jaasep.170 · Cited by 4
Chong, A., & Romkey, L. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--21351 · Cited by 4
Pérez-Torregrosa, A.-B., Romero-López, M.-A., Ibáñez-Cubillas, P., & Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J. (2017) · Revista Practicum · doi:10.24310/revpracticumrep.v2i1.8265 · Cited by 4
de Oliveira, T., Stringhini, D., & Corrêa, D. G. M. (2018) · Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (LACLO) · doi:10.1109/laclo.2018.00073 · Cited by 4
The effectiveness of using scoring rubrics in academic writing to English-majored students
Trinh, L. H. (2020) · Vietnam Journal of Education (online)/Vietnam Journal of Education/Giáo dục · doi:10.52296/vje.2020.83 · Cited by 4
Flipping Professional Development to Improve Writing Skills in Undergraduates
Grose‐Fifer, J., Crossman, A. M., & Baker, S. M. (2021) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2021.1954871 · Cited by 4
Adedoyin, C. A. (2013) · Journal of Teaching in Social Work · doi:10.1080/08841233.2013.774304 · Cited by 4
Tepsuriwong, S., & Bunsom, T. (2013) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n14p279 · Cited by 4
RÚBRICAS Y EVALUACIÓN DE COMPETENCIAS EN LOS TFG Un paso atrás para saltar
Estapé‐Dubreuil, G., Ayza, M. R., Plana, C. L., Pons, J., & Parera, D. T. (2012) · Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) · Cited by 4
Applying a framework to evaluate assignment marking software: a case study on Lightwork
Heinrich, E., & Milne, J. (2012) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v20i0.16152 · Cited by 4
Developing a Behavior-Based Rubric for Assessing Professional Skills During Hiring
Sambamurthy, N., & Cox, M. (2016) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/p.27288 · Cited by 4
A Curriculum Challenge—The Need for Outcome (Competence) Descriptors
Stupans, I. (2017) · Pharmacy · doi:10.3390/pharmacy5010007 · Cited by 8
Kedrowicz, A. A., Hammond, S., & Dorman, D. C. (2017) · Journal of Veterinary Medical Education · doi:10.3138/jvme.0816-124r2 · Cited by 4
Innovative assignment rubrics for ODL courses: design, implementation and impact
Mariapan, R. (2018) · AAOU Journal/AAOU journal · doi:10.1108/aaouj-01-2018-0009 · Cited by 4
Fitt, M. R. H. (2021) · ProQuest Demo Repository · doi:10.26076/326d-494b · Cited by 4
Moni, A., Argüelles, M. J. M., & Serradell-López, E. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app142411554 · Cited by 3
Pérez‐Higueras, J. J., Arroquia, J. J. H., & Gancedo‐Caravia, L. (2025) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.1002/jdd.13831 · Cited by 3
Howell, P., Aryal, A., & Battle, C. (2025) · Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development · doi:10.1108/jbsed-02-2025-0023 · Cited by 3
AI-Supported Grading and Rubric Refinement for Free Response Questions
Zhao, C., Fowler, M., Gertner, Y., Poulsen, S., West, M., & Silva, M. O. (2026) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3770762.3772545 · Cited by 3
Yetiş, V. A. (2019) · Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje · doi:10.15516/cje.v21i1.2922 · Cited by 3
Ishikawa, Y., Umemoto, T., Tsubota, Y., Fujiwara, S., Suto, A., & Nishiyama, K. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77889-7_20 · Cited by 3
Social Science Teachers’ Instructional and Assessment Challenges in the New Normal
Mabborang, F. D. N., Rabago, J. K. M., Paguyo, C. G., Najorda, I. L., & Lasaten, R. C. S. (2023) · Journal of Education Society and Behavioural Science · doi:10.9734/jesbs/2023/v36i71233 · Cited by 3
Leal-Ramı́rez, C., & Echavarría-Heras, H. (2024) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math12071015 · Cited by 3
Bewertung durch eine künstliche Intelligenz?
Reinhold, L., & Händel, M. (2025) · MedienPädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung · doi:10.21240/mpaed/65/2025.08.03.x · Cited by 3
Lorenzo, M. T. C. (2014) · Porta Linguarum Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica de las Lenguas Extranjeras · doi:10.30827/digibug.30492 · Cited by 3
Venning, J., & Buisman‐Pijlman, F. T. A. (2011) · Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) · Cited by 3
Watt, S. S. (2014) · Contemporary Argumentation & Debate · Cited by 3
Formativ evaluering med IT-systemet Peergrade
Bertel, T. F., & Bentzen, T. Ø. (2018) · Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM) · doi:10.7146/lom.v10i18.103307 · Cited by 3
Radiography Student Preferences Regarding Assessments and Feedback
Oh, A., Williams, I., & Hodgson, Y. (2018) · Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal · doi:10.11157/fohpe.v19i3.255 · Cited by 3
A graduate education programs look at grading
Akinde, O. A. (2020) · Educational Research and Reviews · doi:10.5897/err2019.3782 · Cited by 3
Diseño y validación de un instrumento de evaluación de TFG
García, C., González, P. P., & Orcos, L. (2021) · Bordón. Revista de pedagogía · doi:10.13042/bordon.2021.89015 · Cited by 3
Muddle, L., O’Malley, C. J., & Stupans, I. (2021) · International journal of osteopathic medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ijosm.2021.08.001 · Cited by 3
Scierri, I. D. M. (2021) · Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies (ECPS Journal) · doi:10.7358/ecps-2021-024-scie · Cited by 3
Teaching Note—Teaching Students About Homelessness: A Model for Curriculum Integration
Aykanian, A., & Ryan-Dedominicis, T. (2021) · Journal of Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/10437797.2021.1997688 · Cited by 4
Bui, M. C., & Vuong, K. T. M. (2022) · European Journal of English Language Teaching · doi:10.46827/ejel.v7i1.4112 · Cited by 3
Lessons Learned From Quantitatively Exploring Visualization Rubric Utilization for Peer Feedback
Barajas, D. J., Apedoe, X. S., Brizan, D. G., Joshi, A. P., & Engle, S. J. (2022) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcg.2022.3149683 · Cited by 3
Evaluating the impact of transparency on peer review quality in MOOCs
Perdue, M., & Sandland, J. G. (2022) · IEEE Learning With MOOCS (LWMOOCS) · doi:10.1109/lwmoocs53067.2022.9928020 · Cited by 3
Quay, J., Williams, B. J., Pietzner, J., Boyer, A., Browning, D., & Brodie-McKenzie, A. (2023) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2023.2242914 · Cited by 3
de Campos, D. S., & Ferreira, D. J. (2023) · Congresso sobre Tecnologias na Educação (Ctrl+e) · doi:10.5753/ctrle.2023.232953 · Cited by 3
Pancorbo, G., Primi, R., John, O. P., Santos, D. D. D., & Fruyt, F. D. (2023) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2023.2271679 · Cited by 4
:null (2023) · Waxmann Verlag GmbH eBooks · doi:10.31244/9783830997498 · Cited by 5
O uso de rubricas na educação básica: Revisão e recomendações
Brookhart, S. M. (2024) · Estudos em Avaliação Educacional · doi:10.18222/eae.v35.10803 · Cited by 3
Panadero, E., Delgado, P., Barrenetxea-Mínguez, L., Zamorano, D., Pinedo, L., & Fernández-Ortube, A. (2025) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-025-00951-9 · Cited by 3
Dahmash, N. F. B. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1588046 · Cited by 3
Perceptions on Project-Based Assessment Rubrics: A Rubric Design for Indonesian School Contexts
Azhar, F. (2015) · Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4s3p463 · Cited by 3
Teaching and Learning in Saudi Arabia
Hamdan, A. K. (2015) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6300-205-9 · Cited by 3
Díaz, A. M. C. (2013) · Nodos y Nudos · doi:10.17227/01224328.2281 · Cited by 3
Multi-criteria Fuzzy Ordinal Peer Assessment for MOOCs
Capuano, N., & Caballé, S. (2018) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98557-2_34 · Cited by 3
Arcuria, P., Morgan, W., & Fikes, T. G. (2019) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3303772.3303829 · Cited by 3
Detailed Comparison of Instructor and Student-based Assessment in Project Based Learning
Setiawan, A. W. (2019) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon.2019.8725126 · Cited by 3
Evaluation of Self and Peer Assessments in a Second Year Engineering Module
Hassell, D., & Lee, K.-Y. (2019) · IAFOR Journal of Education · doi:10.22492/ije.7.2.06 · Cited by 2
‘Read it, now what? Engaging students with information literacy’
Foord, K. (2020) · Higher Education Skills and Work-based Learning · doi:10.1108/heswbl-06-2020-0128 · Cited by 3
Students' competence in making language skill assessment rubric
Sudaryanto, M., & Akbariski, H. S. (2021) · REID (Research and Evaluation in Education) · doi:10.21831/reid.v7i2.44005 · Cited by 3
van Helvoort, A. A. J. (2013) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-03919-0_58 · Cited by 3
Peer-review in architecture education: Application in Geographic Information Systems learning
Garcia-Almirall, M. P., Domínguez, E. R., Dalmau, F. V., & Fonseca, D. (2015) · Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) · doi:10.1109/cisti.2015.7170497 · Cited by 3
Puig, M. S. (2015) · tic revista d innovació educativa · doi:10.7203/attic.14.4176 · Cited by 3
Du changement dans l’évaluation du travail d’équipe : validation de l’outil RUTE
Nadal, C. T., Rodríguez, J. L. C., Farrán, F. X. C., & Barado, S. I. (2014) · Les dossiers des sciences de l éducation · doi:10.4000/dse.603 · Cited by 4
McMay, D. V., Gradel, K., & Scott, C. (2013) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2013.41009 · Cited by 3
Developing reflection on competence-based learning: the Russian experience with the Tuning approach
Serbati, A., & Surian, A. (2014) · Tuning Journal for Higher Education · doi:10.18543/tjhe-1(2)-2014pp463-481 · Cited by 4
Quality Assurance for OER : Current State of the Art and the TIPS Framework
Kawachi, P. (2015) · E-learning papers · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H.
- Affiliations
- ICFAI Business School (IN)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Reddy, Y. Malini
- ORCID
- Andrade, Heidi
- Venue
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-08-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 435-448
- ISSN
- 0260-2938 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2025828126
- Cited by
- 917
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 46.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University at Albany
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- rubrics, higher education assessment, academic performance, rater reliability, rubric validity, student perceptions, program evaluation, course improvement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review