Cited by 137Thermoregulation and physiological responsesGastrointestinal motility and disordersExercise and Physiological Responses

Gastrointestinal distress is common during a 161-km ultramarathon

Stuempfle, Kristin Jean, Hoffman, Martin Dean·2015·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

This study examined the incidence, severity, and timing of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in finishers and non-finishers of the 161-km Western States Endurance Run. A total of 272 runners (71.0% of starters) completed a post-race questionnaire that assessed the incidence and severity (none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3, very severe = 4) of 12 upper (reflux/heartburn, belching, stomach bloating, stomach cramps/pain, nausea, vomiting) and lower (intestinal cramps/pain, flatulence, side ache/stitch, urge to defecate, loose stool/diarrhoea, intestinal bleeding/bloody faeces) GI symptoms experienced during each of four race segments. GI symptoms were experienced by most runners (96.0%). Flatulence (65.9% frequency, mean value 1.0, s = 0.6 severity), belching (61.3% frequency, mean value 1.0, s = 0.6 severity), and nausea (60.3% frequency, mean value 1.0, s = 0.7 severity) were the most common symptoms. Among race finishers, 43.9% reported that GI symptoms affected their race performance, with nausea being the most common symptom (86.0%). Among race non-finishers, 35.6% reported that GI symptoms were a reason for dropping out of the race, with nausea being the most common symptom (90.5%). For both finishers and non-finishers, nausea was greatest during the most challenging and hottest part of the race. GI symptoms are very common during ultramarathon running, and in particular, nausea is the most common complaint for finishers and non-finishers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2015.1012104

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stuempfle, K. J., & Hoffman, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Gettysburg College (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Stuempfle, Kristin Jean
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2015-02-26
Volume
33
Issue
17
Pages
1814-1821
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2036018519
Cited by
137
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5
FWCI
9.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Cupola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College (Gettysburg College) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
gastrointestinal symptoms, ultramarathon, nausea, flatulence, belching, diarrhea, race performance, heat exposure, endurance running
MeSH terms
Adult, Eructation, Female, Flatulence, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea, Physical Endurance, Running

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review