Cited by 73Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Rumination following bereavement: an overview

Open access
Eisma, Maarten C, Stroebe, Margaret S·2017·Bereavement Care

Abstract

This contribution provides an overview of rumination (i.e., thinking repetitively and recurrently about negative events and/or negative emotions) in adjustment to bereavement. First, we summarise a growing literature on rumination and mental health outcomes of bereavement. Next, we compare two main theories explaining the maladaptive effects of rumination after loss, which hold conflicting implications for clinical practice. The Response Styles Theory (RST) states that rumination is a maladaptive confrontation strategy that perpetuates distress by increasing negative cognitions, impairing problem solving and instrumental behaviour and reducing social support. Conversely, the Rumination as Avoidance Hypothesis (RAH) holds that rumination may serve to avoid painful aspects of the loss, thereby hampering adjustment to bereavement. Crucially, while RST predicts that distraction reduces rumination, RAH predicts that loss exposure is more effective. We review evidence for RST and RAH and their clinical implications and conclude with a brief exploration of ways to reconcile these theories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02682621.2017.1349291

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One longitudinal study demonstrated that worry predicted complicated grief symptoms over and above baseline symptoms and background variables.

    “One longitudinal study demonstrated that worry predicted CG symptoms over and above baseline symptoms and background variables (Eisma et al., 2017).”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Eisma et al., 2017

    The ‘grief rumination’ section (page unavailable) reports longitudinal associations between grief rumination and complicated-grief symptoms. The ‘Depressive rumination’ section (page unavailable) describes a baseline-symptom adjustment for a finding about reflection, but the copy does not report that worry predicted complicated grief after adjustment for baseline symptoms and background variables. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Three surveys showed moderate positive associations between worry and complicated grief symptoms concurrently and longitudinally.

    “The relationship between worry (repetitive, negative thoughts and images about the future) and CG symptoms was examined in three surveys that showed moderate positive associations between worry and CG symptoms concurrently and longitudinally (Boelen, 2010b; Boelen et al., 2016; Eisma et al., 2017).”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Eisma et al., 2017

    The ‘grief rumination’ section (page unavailable) reports concurrent and longitudinal associations between grief rumination and complicated-grief symptoms, but it does not identify that thinking as worry about the future. Searches for ‘worry,’ ‘three surveys,’ and worry–grief associations found no passage reporting the claimed moderate associations. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Worry predicted complicated grief symptoms longitudinally over and above baseline symptoms in one study, yet not in another.

    “Worry predicted symptoms longitudinally over and above baseline symptoms in one study (Eisma et al., 2017), yet not in another (Boelen et al., 2016).”

    From Emotion Regulatory Strategies in Complicated Grief: A Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Eisma et al., 2017

    The “grief rumination” section reports longitudinal associations between grief rumination and complicated grief symptoms, but it does not say that worry predicted those symptoms after controlling for baseline symptoms. Searches for worry and longitudinal prediction found no passage establishing the finding attributed to Eisma et al. (2017). (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Freud, S (1917/1957). Mourning and melancholia. In: J Strachey (ed). Standard edition of the complete works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth, 152-170.
  2. Tai R, Silver RC (1989). Coming to terms with major negative life events. In: JS Uleman, JA Bargh (eds). Unintended thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 351-382.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eisma, M. C., & Stroebe, M. S.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Eisma, Maarten C
  • Stroebe, Margaret S
Venue
Bereavement Care
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
58-64
ISSN
  • 0268-2621 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8279
OpenAlex
W2735491261
Cited by
73
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bereavement Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
rumination, bereavement, grief, adaptation to loss, response styles theory, distraction, negative thinking, social support, mental health outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review