Cited by 84Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory Processes and Influences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attentional biases in dysphoria: An eye-tracking study of the allocation and disengagement of attention

Abstract

This study looked for evidence of biases in the allocation and disengagement of attention in dysphoric individuals. Participants studied images for a recognition memory test while their eye fixations were tracked and recorded. Four image types were presented (depression-related, anxiety-related, positive, neutral) in each of two study conditions. For the simultaneous study condition, four images (one of each type) were presented simultaneously for 10 seconds, and the number of fixations and the total fixation time to each image was measured, similar to the procedure used by Eizenman et al. (2003) and Kellough, Beevers, Ellis, and Wells (2008). For the sequential study condition, four images (one of each type) were presented consecutively, each for 4 seconds; to measure disengagement of attention an endogenous cuing procedure was used (Posner, 1980). Dysphoric individuals spent significantly less time attending to positive images than non-dysphoric individuals, but there were no group differences in attention to depression-related images. There was also no evidence of a dysphoria-related bias in initial shifts of attention. With respect to the disengagement of attention, dysphoric individuals were slower to disengage their attention from depression-related images. The recognition memory data showed that dysphoric individuals had poorer memory for emotional images, but there was no evidence of a conventional mood-congruent memory bias. Differences in the attentional and memory biases observed in depressed and dysphoric individuals are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699930903399319

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sears et al. (2010) found that depressed individuals were slower initiating saccades away from dysphoric images, but not other image types, compared to non-depressed individuals, and this maintenance bias was not revealed in a free viewing condition of their study.

    “Sears et al. (2010) found that depressed individuals were slower initiating saccades away from dysphoric images, but not other image types (i.e., threatening, pleasant, neutral) compared to non-depressed individuals, a maintenance bias that was not revealed in a free viewing condition of their study.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Beck A. T., 1993, Beck Anxiety Inventory Manual
  2. Beck A. T., 1996, Beck Depression Inventory Manual
  3. Klein R. M., 2000, Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes, 195

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sears, C. R., Thomas, C. L., LeHuquet, J. M., & Johnson, J. C. S.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Sears, Christopher R.
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2010-12
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
1349-1368
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W1987373083
Cited by
84
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
dysphoria, attentional bias, attentional disengagement, attention allocation, depression, anxiety, eye fixations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review