The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The student as co‐producer: learning from public administration about the student–university relationship
Abstract
The dominant metaphor/model used to characterise the relationship of the student to the university, that is, the ‘student as consumer’, is partial and not appropriate to the realities of contemporary higher education. This article suggests that co‐production, a concept drawn from the public administration literature, offers a more appropriate metaphor. In this metaphor, the student, lecturers and others who support the learning process are viewed as being engaged in a cooperative enterprise focused on the production, dissemination and application of knowledge, and on the development of learners rather than merely skilled technicians.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S. (1996) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001 · Cited by 7,281
Morgan, G. (1986) · Cited by 5,650
ON QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES IN LEARNING: I—OUTCOME AND PROCESS*
MARTON, F., & SÄLJÖ, R. (1976) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x · Cited by 4,608
Hirsch, F., & Lamberton, D. M. (1977) · Economic Analysis and Policy · doi:10.1016/s0313-5926(77)50008-2 · Cited by 2,759
Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development
Ostrom, E. (1996) · World Development · doi:10.1016/0305-750x(96)00023-x · Cited by 2,637
Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services
Bovaird, T. (2007) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x · Cited by 1,971
The spirit of community: rights, responsibilities, and the Communitarian agenda
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-1818 · Cited by 830
Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery
Whitaker, G. P. (1980) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.2307/975377 · Cited by 647
The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda
Pierre, A. J., & Etzioni, A. (1993) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20045724 · Cited by 477
Cited by
Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education
Bryson, C. (2016) · International Journal for Academic Development · doi:10.1080/1360144x.2016.1124966 · Cited by 864
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4 · Cited by 685
Nixon, E., Scullion, R., & Hearn, R. (2018) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1196353 · Cited by 267
The consumerist turn in higher education: Policy aspirations and outcomes
Naidoo, R., Shankar, A., & Veer, E. (2011) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2011.609135 · Cited by 221
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Bovill, C. (2020) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1620721 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- McCulloch, A.
- Venue
- Studies in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-183
- ISSN
- 0307-5079 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-174X
- OpenAlex
- W2012685465
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 50.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The student as co‐producer: learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/03075070802562857
- The paper
- McCulloch, A. (2009). The student as co‐producer: learning from public administration about the student–university relationship. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802562857
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.