The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective
Abstract
:Electronic data interchange (EDI) has dramatically changed the manner in which interorganizational transactions are conducted. The electronic exchange of transaction documents has had a significant impact on business practices, particularly in the sales and purchase/merchandising functions of organizations. EDI brings in many benefits to the organization such as reduced costs, faster turnaround. better customer service, and in some firms strategic advantage over their competitors. Despite these benefits, rums still have problems in implementing EDI.This study, drawing upon research in innovation theory and information systems, examines the relationship between various innovation characteristics (complexity, two forms of compatibility, costs, relative advantage, and communicability) and various attributes of diffusion (adaptation, internal diffusion, external diffusion, and implementation success) of EDI in organizations. The data for the study were collected from a large-scale field survey of 201 firms in the United States that have implemented EDI. Two senior executives, one from information systems (IS) and the other from the sales/purchase function, provided matched responses to a questionnaire that measured the various research constructs.The results of the multivariate regression analyses revealed that relative advantage, costs, and technical compatibility were the major predictors of adaptation. While relative advantage and duration were important predictors of internal diffusion, technical compatibility and duration were found to be important predictors of external diffusion. Both forms of compatibility (technical and organizational) and costs were found to be important predictors of implementation success in EDI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549
Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60 · Cited by 10,697
Cited by
Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective1
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036518 · Cited by 1,639
Kuan, K. K. Y., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2001) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00073-8 · Cited by 1,335
Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption
Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571111161262 · Cited by 1,181
A Review of the Predictors, Linkages, and Biases in IT Innovation Adoption Research
Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J. W., & Lacity, M. C. (2006) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000056 · Cited by 1,136
Adoption of new information technologies in rural small businesses
Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999) · Omega · doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00071-1 · Cited by 1,108
Self-citationUnderstanding the determinants of RFID adoption in the manufacturing industry
Wang, Y.-M., Wang, Y.-S., & Yang, Y.-F. (2010) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.03.006 · Cited by 912
Toward Blockchain-Based Accounting and Assurance
Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-51804 · Cited by 881
Understanding e-business adoption across industries in European countries
Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2010) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571011087428 · Cited by 641
A Meta-Analysis of Research on Information Technology Implementation in Small Business
Premkumar, G. (2003) · Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1207/s15327744joce1302_2 · Cited by 444
Self-citationA conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations
Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007 · Cited by 442
Determinants of E-Business Use in U.S. Firms
Hsu, P.-F., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D. (2006) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415100401 · Cited by 330
Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore
Tung, L. L., & Rieck, O. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.06.001 · Cited by 278
Organizational intention to adopt big data in the B2B context: An integrated view
Sun, S., Hall, D. J., & Cegielski, C. G. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.09.003 · Cited by 212
Information technology adoption: a review of the literature and classification
Salahshour Rad, M., Nilashi, M., & Mohamed Dahlan, H. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-017-0534-z · Cited by 181
Li, Y.-H. (2008) · 2008 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering 15th Annual Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icmse.2008.4668890 · Cited by 112
The assimilation of RFID technology by Chinese companies: A technology diffusion perspective
Wei, J., Lowry, P. B., & Seedorf, S. (2015) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.05.001 · Cited by 112
Azadegan, A., & Teich, J. (2010) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/14635771011060558 · Cited by 86
Organizational determinants of IT adoption in the pharmaceutical distribution sector
Bruque-Cámara, S., Vargas-Sánchez, A., & Hernández-Ortiz, M. J. (2004) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000490 · Cited by 61
Developing and validating a model explaining the assimilation process of RFID: An empirical study
Hossain, M. A., Quaddus, M., & Islam, N. (2016) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9537-y · Cited by 57
Motivators for IOS Adoption in Denmark
Henriksen, H. Z. (2006) · Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations · doi:10.4018/jeco.2006040102 · Cited by 37
Understanding and improving artifact sharing in software engineering research
Timperley, C. S., Herckis, L., Le Goues, C., & Hilton, M. (2021) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-021-09973-5 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K., & Nilakanta, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 157-186
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W144083620
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
