The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures
Abstract
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)software systems integrate key business and management processes within and beyond a firm's boundary.Although the business value of ERP implementations has been extensively debated in trade periodicals in the form of qualitative discussion or detailed case studies, there is little large-sample statistical evidence on whether the benefits of ERP implementation exceed the costs and risks. With multiyear multi-firm ERP implementation and financial data, we find that firms that invest in ERP tend to show higher performance across a wide variety of financial metrics. Even though there is a slowdown in business performance and productivity shortly after the implementation, financial markets consistently reward the adopters with higher market valuation (as measured by Tobin's q). Due to the lack of mid- and long-term post-implementation data, future research on the long-run impact of ERP is proposed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“empirical evidence confirms that their dream to improve market positioning and to take advantage of governments' support programs have lately precipitated SMEs to adopt ERP in some economies (Hitt et al., 2002;Lall & Teyarachakul, 2006;Ramdani, Kawalek, & Lorenzo, 2009).”
From Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution (2016) · cites this paper as Hitt et al., 2002
Citations
Cites
Organization design: an information processing view
Galbraith, J. R. (1974) · Interfaces · doi:10.1287/inte.4.3.28 · Cited by 2,451
Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Evidence from Panel Data
Hitt, L. M. (1999) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.10.2.134 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–630 of 630
Information Technology Investments And Aggregate Productivity
Choi, P., & Choe, H. (2016) · doi:10.19030/jabr.v32i4.9716
“Brynjolfsson and Hitt (2002) Hitt et al. (2002) Hitt and Brynjolfsson (1996) Kudyba and Diwan (2002) 1994—1997 Park et al. (2007) Copyright by author(s); CC-BY 999 The Clute Institute The dynamics of IT investments are determined by intertemporal and income factors: First, the natural increase of…”
BackgroundChadha, P. (2016) · doi:10.4172/2472-114x.1000132
“Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software systems join key business and management procedures inside and outside a firm’s boundary [1].”
BackgroundAn IT Risk-Return Model to Study IT Governance of Indian Firms
Tripathi, M., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Bose, I. (2015) · Web · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45408-5_21
Guerreiro, A., & Guerreiro, G. (2015) · doi:10.2047/ijltfesvol6iss2-1108-1114
Pratiwi, B., & Winarno, W. (2014) · doi:10.19184/jauj.v11i1.1259
Boșcoianu, M., & Boșcoianu, E. (2013) · doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.436.571
“There should be consider: the level of personalization (with impact on costs); the impact of the re-engineering process, with major structural changes, that complicate the process of cost – benefits estimation (Stefanou, 2001); the new dynamics of ICT that generates new paradigms [7].”
BackgroundThe Dark Side of Employee Mobility: Evidence from Enterprise Software Adoption
Claussen, J., & Grohsjean, T. (2012) · Academy of Management Proceedings · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2012.13803abstract
“To make the results more comparable to the results of Hitt et al. (2002), we run some estimations with industry fixed effects at the three digit NAICS level instead of firm fixed effects.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInter-Organizational IT Capability in China: An Empirical Analysis of Dimensions and Influences
Wu, J.-N., Liu, L., Wang, N., & Wang, Z.-N. (2012) · Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations · doi:10.4018/jeco.2012070105
Notice of RetractionAnalysis on inefficient ERP investment based on Behavioral Finance
Yu, T., & Sun, Y. (2011) · International Conference on E-Business and E-Government · doi:10.1109/icebeg.2011.5882316
RetractedThe ERP investment: An evaluation model
Wu, L.-C., & Liou, F.-M. (2010) · International Conference on Education and Management Technology · doi:10.1109/icemt.2010.5657541
“However, investing in ERP system requires a substantial investment of time, money, and resources and is fraught with technical and business risk [ 1 ].”
BackgroundStudy of the Internet-based supply chain management application
Wang, Y.-X., Zhang, X.-C., & Wang, H.-T. (2010) · International Conference on Computer Application and System Modeling · doi:10.1109/iccasm.2010.5619151
Electronic Networking Technologies, Innovation Misfit and Plant PerformancePreprint
Fichman, R. G., & Melville, N. P. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1554317
“…number of studies have verified a positive link between IT capital and productivity, both when IT is defined as aggregated IT investment (Brynjolfsson and Hitt 1996) and when it is defined as the use of some particular technology (Barua et al. 2004; Hitt et al. 2002; Mukhopadhyay et al. 1997).”
BackgroundA study on architecture and key techniques of agricultural resource planning
Li, Y., Wu, H., Dong, H., & Zhang, X. (2009) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference · doi:10.1109/ccdc.2009.5194871
The Quantitative Effects of ERP Systems in Korean Manufacturing Industry
장활식, Choi, W.-H., Park, K.-O., & 한정희 (2008) · Management & Information Systems Review · doi:10.29214/damis.2008..26.002
Ludmer, G., & Falk, J. A. (2007) · doi:10.4301/s1807-17752007000200003
ERP Investment Evaluation Based on Options Theory
Wu, L.-C., Ong, C.-S., & Hsu, Y. (2006) · doi:10.6382/jim.200610.0001
“ERP is significantly more time-consuming to invest than ordinary IT applications, often taking two to five years to get into operation (Hitt et al. 2002).”
BackgroundImpact of Different ERP Systems on Organizational Performance and Managerial Decision Making
Williams, M. R., Kocakulah, M., & McGuire, B. L. (2006) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.903212
Development of a learning package for interactive learning in enterprise resources planning (ERP)
Chattopadhyay, G. (2004) · 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574) · doi:10.1109/iemc.2004.1407501
The Value of Academic Research
Piccoli, G., & Wagner, E. (2003) · doi:10.1177/0010880403442003
CRM Systems and Management Revenue Forecasts: Evidence from ASC 606
Cheng, Z., Frost, T. S., He, Z., & Richardson, V. J. (2025) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5355331
Pirro, N. (2024) · Social Science Research Network · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4845318
Does ERP Adoption Affect Stock Price Volatility? Evidence from Egypt
Abdelall, M. A. A., & Wu, D. (2023) · International Journal of Economics Business and Management Research · doi:10.51505/ijebmr.2023.71108
“Previous research on the use of ERP has concentrated on its effects on firm performance (Poston & Grabski, 2001; Hitt et al., 2002; Nicolaou, 2004), management control (Chapman & Kihn, 2009; Morris a, 2011), earnings management (Brazel & Dang, 2008), internal control weakness (Morris b, 2011),…”
MethodSelf-citationMaximizing the Value of Packaged Software Customization
Balint, B. (2021) · Research Anthology on Recent Trends, Tools, and Implications of Computer Programming · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch025
Gärtner, B., Duller, C., & Stadler, A. (2019) · Controlling – Aktuelle Entwicklungen und Herausforderungen · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-27723-9_7
Drivers of the Alignment of Financial Accounting to Management Accounting
Trucco, S. (2015) · Contributions to management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18723-5_4
Software, firm performance and work organisation : an empirical analysis
Sarbu, M. (2014) · doi:10.22028/d291-23385
“The empirical analyses done so far on the topic of software and rm performance con- rm that enterprise software positively impacts rm performance (Aral et al. 2006; Hendricks et al. 2007; Hitt et al. 2002).”
BackgroundTECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT DRESDEN
Manuskript, A., Herbach, C., Merla, K., Musiol, G., Ortlepp, H., Pausch, G., Alkhazov, I. D., Drapchinsky, L. V., Ganza, E. A., Kovalenko, S., et al. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9783527693009.ch18
Ludmer, G., & Falk, J. A. (2007) · Americanae (AECID Library) · doi:10.1590/s1807-17752007000200003 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Management Information Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-98
- ISSN
- 0742-1222 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-928X
- OpenAlex
- W2146740775
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 50.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management Information Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- enterprise resource planning, ERP implementation, business value, firm performance, productivity, Tobin's Q, market valuation, IT investment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
