Cited by 34Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionStudent Stress and Coping

Facets of dispositional mindfulness versus sources of social support predicting college students’ psychological adjustment

Kingery, Julie Newman, Bodenlos, Jamie S., Lathrop, Jessica A.·2020·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the relative contribution of five dispositional mindfulness (DM) facets and two aspects of social support along with sex in predicting psychological adjustment. Participants: Three hundred fifty-three undergraduates (72% female; M = 18.82 years) participated with data collected from September 2014 through March 2016. Methods: Self-report measures of DM, social support, perceived stress, and emotional well-being were completed. Results: Sex and higher scores on specific mindfulness facets (ie, nonreactivity, nonjudging) predicted lower stress and greater emotional well-being. Higher family support predicted lower stress, whereas friend support predicted greater emotional well-being. The mindfulness facets were stronger predictors of adjustment than the social support domains. Females reported higher perceived stress and lower emotional well-being than males, and males scored significantly higher on total mindfulness, nonjudging, and nonreactivity. Conclusions: Results have implications for mindfulness-based interventions with college students such that focusing on the nonjudging and nonreactivity facets may enhance effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2019.1574801

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kingery, J. N., Bodenlos, J. S., & Lathrop, J. A.
Affiliations
Hobart and William Smith Colleges (US)
Corresponding author
Kingery, Julie Newman
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2019-03-25
Volume
68
Issue
4
Pages
403-410
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W2994860525
Cited by
34
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
FWCI
5.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
trait mindfulness, mindfulness facets, non-judgment, non-reactivity, social support, family support, friend support, perceived stress, emotional well-being, psychological adjustment, university students, sex differences, mindfulness-based interventions
MeSH terms
Emotional Adjustment, Adolescent, Emotions, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Personality, Sex Factors, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Students, Universities, Young Adult, Self Report, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review