Cited by 2,123Aging, Health, and DisabilityHealth disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology Research

Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations

Open access
Lubben, James, Blozik, Eva, Gillmann, Gerhard, Iliffe, Steve, von Renteln Kruse, Wolfgang, Beck, John C., Stuck, Andreas E.·2006·The Gerontologist

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is a need for valid and reliable short scales that can be used to assess social networks and social supports and to screen for social isolation in older persons. DESIGN AND METHODS: The present study is a cross-national and cross-cultural evaluation of the performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS-6), which was used to screen for social isolation among community-dwelling older adult populations in three European countries. Based on the concept of lack of redundancy of social ties we defined clinical cut-points of the LSNS-6 for identifying persons deemed at risk for social isolation. RESULTS: Among all three samples, the LSNS-6 and two subscales (Family and Friends) demonstrated high levels of internal consistency, stable factor structures, and high correlations with criterion variables. The proposed clinical cut-points showed good convergent validity, and classified 20% of the respondents in Hamburg, 11% of those in Solothurn (Switzerland), and 15% of those in London as at risk for social isolation. IMPLICATIONS: We conclude that abbreviated scales such as the LSNS-6 should be considered for inclusion in practice protocols of gerontological practitioners. Screening older persons based on the LSNS-6 provides quantitative information on their family and friendship ties, and identifies persons at increased risk for social isolation who might benefit from in-depth assessment and targeted interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/geront/46.4.503

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lubben, J., Blozik, E., Gillmann, G., Iliffe, S., von Renteln Kruse, W., Beck, J. C., & Stuck, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Boston College (US)
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
  • Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (CH)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Stuck, Andreas E.
Venue
The Gerontologist
Published
2006-08
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
503-513
ISSN
  • 0016-9013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5341
OpenAlex
W2116281003
Cited by
2,123
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 257 · 2025: 289 · 2024: 248 · 2023: 231 · 2022: 224 · 2021: 191 · 2020: 156 · 2019: 100 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 64 · 2016: 69 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 31
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Gerontologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Funders
European Commission (QLK6-CT-1999-02205)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
Lubben Social Network Scale, social isolation, social networks, social support, older adults, community-dwelling older adults, abbreviated scale, screening, family ties, friendship ties, cross-cultural validation, psychometric properties
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Cultural Comparison, England, Family, Germany, Humans, Male, Psychological Tests, Residence Characteristics, Social Isolation, Social Support, Switzerland, Reproducibility of Results, Geriatric Assessment, Friends, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review