Cited by 91Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Attachment, continuing bonds, and complicated grief following violent loss: testing a moderated model.

Currier, Joseph M., Irish, Jennifer E. F., Neimeyer, Robert A., Foster, Joshua D.·2015·Death Studies

Abstract

There is increasing consensus that mourners' general attachment security and ongoing sense of connectedness to the deceased figure prominently in adjustment to bereavement. However, the interplay between these variables has not been investigated thoroughly. We therefore studied 195 young adults who were bereaved by violent causes (homicide, suicide, and fatal accidents) in the previous 2 years, measuring their attachment-related insecurities (anxiety and avoidance), their specific ongoing attachment or "continuing bond" (CB) to the deceased, and their complicated grief (CG) symptomatology over the loss of this relationship. Analyses indicated that CBs were concurrently linked with greater CG symptomatology. However, other results also suggested that attachment could moderate the adaptiveness of maintaining a sense of connection to the deceased loved one. Specifically, CBs were less predictive of CG symptomatology for individuals with high anxiety and low avoidance, and most predictive of intense grieving for bereaved people whose attachment styles were more highly avoidant and minimally anxious. These findings suggest the relevance of evaluating the appropriateness of clinical techniques that emphasize or deemphasize the CB for mourners who differ in their styles of attachment. Such studies could potentially promote a better match of interventions to clients whose styles of coping are congruent with these procedures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07481187.2014.975869

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Currier, J. M., Irish, J. E. F., Neimeyer, R. A., & Foster, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of South Alabama (US)
  • Fuller Theological Seminary (US)
  • University of Memphis (US)
Corresponding author
Currier, Joseph M.
Venue
Death Studies
Published
2014-12-31
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
201-210
ISSN
  • 0748-1187 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-7683
OpenAlex
W2031667390
Cited by
91
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Death Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
complicated grief, continuing bonds, attachment security, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, homicide, suicide, fatal accidents, bereavement, young adults, moderated mediation, attachment styles, grief intervention
MeSH terms
Accidents, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Bereavement, Death, Escape Reaction, Female, Grief, Homicide, Humans, Male, Object Attachment, Prognosis, Psychological Techniques, Psychopathology, Social Adjustment, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review