Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018)

Singh, Vandana, Thurman, Alexander·2019·American Journal of Distance Education

Abstract

Online learning as a concept and as a keyword has consistently been a focus of education research for over two decades. In this paper, we present results from a systematic literature review for the definitions of online learning because the concept of online learning, though often defined, has a range of meanings attached to it. Authors and scholars use the term to mean very distinct, if not contradictory concepts. We conducted systematic literature for over the last 30 years (1988 to 2018) to investigate the number and content of definitions of online learning. We collected 46 definitions from 37 resources and conducted a content analysis on these sets of definitions. Content analysis of the collected definitions led to an understanding of the core elements for defining online learning, the confusion surrounding the terms and the synonyms used for online learning. An evolution of the definition of the concept of online learning was also mapped to the evolution of technology in the last three decades.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bates A. W., 2001, Teaching faculty how to use technology: Best practices from leading institutions, 141
  2. Budd R. W., 1967, Content analysis of communications
  3. 10.14221/ajte.204v39n11.8 · doi:10.14221/ajte.204v39n11.8
  4. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03723.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.19030/cier.v7i3.8645 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/07399339209516006 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/s10956-016-9605-9 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Graham C. R, 2006, Handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs, 3
  9. 10.1145/1089107 · doi:10.1145/1089107
  10. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01183.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00009-7 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Lindkvist K., 1981, Advances in content analysis, 23
  14. Lowenthal P. R., 2009, 32nd Annual proceedings: Selected research and development papers presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology
  15. 10.1080/08923647.2017.1264807 · DOI
  16. Miller A., 2016, Suggestions for improving IPEDS distance education data collection. (NPEC 2017). U.S. Department of Education
  17. 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.24059/olj.v20i2.790 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Palloff R., 2001, Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching
  20. 10.1080/00909889909365539 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1080/10668926.2015.1044584 · DOI
  22. 10.2304/pfie.2009.7.5.555 · DOI
  23. 10.14705/rpnet.2019.36.956 · DOI
  24. Tavangarian, D., Leypold, M.E., Nölting, K., Röser, M. & Voigt, D.Is e-Learning the solution for individual learning?Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 2 (2) (2004), pp. 273–280
  25. Tesch R., 1990, Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools
  26. Triacca L, 2004, Systematic Usability Evaluation for E-learning Web Applicationsaace Journal, 12, 4

Cited by

See all 1,425

Metadata

Authors
Singh, V., & Thurman, A.
Venue
American Journal of Distance Education
Published
2019-10-01
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
289-306
ISSN
  • 0892-3647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-9286
OpenAlex
W2977355190
Cited by
1,425
References
2
FWCI
53.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082
The paper
Singh, V., & Thurman, A. (2019). How Many Ways Can We Define Online Learning? A Systematic Literature Review of Definitions of Online Learning (1988-2018). American Journal of Distance Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1663082

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.