Cited by 186Water Governance and InfrastructureWater Resource Management and QualityTransboundary Water Resource Management

Gender, class, and access to water: Three cases in a poor and crowded delta.

Open access
Crow, Ben, Sultana, Farhana·2002·Society & Natural Resources

Abstract

Water plays a pivotal role in economic activity and in human well-being. Because of the prominence of water in production (primarily for irrigation) and in domestic use (drinking, washing, cooking), conflict over water and the effects of gender-influenced decisions about water may have far-reaching consequences on human well-being, economic growth, and social change. At the same time, social conflicts and social change are shaped and mediated, often in unexpected ways, by the natural conditions in which water occurs. The social relations of water are poorly understood. This article introduces a framework for disaggregating conditions of access to water and uses it to examine three pressing questions in Bangladesh. First, extraction of groundwater for irrigation has made many drinking-water hand pumps run dry. Second, increasing use of groundwater for drinking has been associated with the poisoning of at least 20 million people through naturally occurring arsenic in groundwater. Third, the article examines some of the ways access to water has been changed by the rise of shrimp aquaculture for export. This article highlights new directions for the analysis of interactions among water, class, and gender. The existing literature has tended to focus on the implications of gender analysis for government policy, especially development projects and water resources management, and for women's organization. In this article we begin to sketch some questions that arise from a concern to understand the broader context of social change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08941920290069308

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General and sexual harassment are more frequently observed/documented in sanitation than water research.

    “General harassment, including taunting, teasing, name calling, and throwing things at women or girls is more frequently observed in sanitation [138, 168, 174, 175, 181, 187, 190, 263] than water research [168,199] Sexual harassment, including verbal harassment, peeping, flashing, and male masturbation is also more frequently documented in sanitation [171-174, 189, 190, 214, 217, 226, 231, 233]”
  • Women qualitatively reported perceived linkages between various illnesses and their water and sanitation environments, including diarrhea, vomiting, dysentery, cholera, hepatitis, schistosomiasis, and skin diseases due to polluted water, and diarrhea due to limitations on hygiene in times of water scarcity.

    “Women reported experiencing or fearing diarrhea, vomiting, dysentery, cholera, hepatitis, schistosomiasis, and skin diseases due to polluted water, [65,70,86,111,144,177,178,197,199,214,220,225,231,248,259,273,288] and experiencing diarrhea due to limitations on hygiene in times of water scarcity [70,123,202].”
  • When women lacked control over income and assets, they had limited decision-making power over improving or accessing water sources; constrained finances limited women's access to preferred water sources, desired water quantity, and water treatment methods.

    “When women lacked control over income and assets, they had limited decision-making power over improving or accessing water sources [65,76,86,118,123,194,199,201,258,292].Constrained finances limited women's access to preferred water sources, [64,86,111,158,170,194,[197][198][199] desired water quantity, [86,192] and water treatment methods [86,111,118,204,293].”
  • Women reported challenges related to privacy and water, specifically concerning hygiene, including challenges obtaining privacy at water sources used for bathing, post-defecation cleansing, and washing, particularly during menstruation.

    “Women reported challenges related to privacy and water, specifically concerning hygiene.Women and girls in Bangladesh, [199] India, [184, 189, 226] Indonesia, [115] and Mozambique [175, 261] described challenges obtaining privacy at water sources used for bathing, post-defecation cleansing, and washing, particularly during menstruation.”
  • Constraints on women's time limit access to safe water or resources needed to treat or boil water; women also spend considerable time caring for family members ill with water-related diseases.

    “Constraints on women's time limit access to safe water or resources needed to treat or boil water [92,118,197,199,208]. Women also spend considerable time caring for family members ill with waterrelated diseases [26,63,111,177,193,239,240,248,259].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Agarwal, B. 1994. Gender and command over property: A critical gap in economic analysis and policy in South Asia. World Dev. 22(10):1455±1478.
  2. Agarwal, B. 1997b. Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Econ. 3(1):1±51.
  3. Agarwal, B. 2000. Conceptualizing environmental collective action: Why gender matters. Cambridge J. Econ. 24(3):283±285.
  4. Boyce, J. 1987. Agrarian impasse in Bengal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Elson, D. 1995. Male bias in the development process, 2nd ed. Manchester: Manchester Uni- versity Press.
  6. Harvey, C. 2002. Hydrogeological and geochemical causes of high arsenic concentrations in the Ganges Delta. US-Bangladesh Collaborative Workshop on the Ganges-Brahmaputr a Delta of Bangladesh: Issues of Land, Water and Environment, Bangladesh, January 28±31.
  7. Jackson, C. 1998. Gender, irrigation and environment: Arguing for agency. Agric. Hum. Values 15(4):313±324.
  8. National Conference. 1999. Proceeding of the National Conference on Co-ordinated Action for Arsenic Mitigation, February, Dhaka, Bangladesh, organized by Government of Bangladesh with UNDP, World Bank, WHO, UNICEF.
  9. Pearson, R. 1992. Gender matters in development. In Poverty and development in the 1990s, eds. T. Allen and A. Thomas, 291±312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Rahman, A. 1994. The impact of shrimp culture on the coastal environment. In Environment and development in Bangladesh, eds. A. A. Rahman, S. Huq, R. Haider, and E. Jansen, Vol. 1, 449±524. Bangladesh: University Press Ltd.
  11. Sadeque, S. Z. 1996. Nature's bounty or scarce commodity: Competition and consensus over ground water use in Banglades h. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Inter- national Association for the Study of Common Property, Berkeley, CA, June.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crow, B., & Sultana, F.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Venue
Society & Natural Resources
Published
2002-09
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
709-724
ISSN
  • 0894-1920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0723
OpenAlex
W1559454724
Cited by
186
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Society & Natural Resources (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Transboundary Water Resource Management
Keywords
water access, gender, social class, groundwater pumping, arsenic toxicity, drinking water, irrigation, shrimp aquaculture, Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna delta, Bangladesh, social change, water conflicts, hand pumps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review