Cited by 365Cognitive Abilities and TestingReading and Literacy DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Working memory training improves reading processes in typically developing children.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to investigate whether a brief cognitive training intervention results in a specific performance increase in the trained task, and whether there are transfer effects to other nontrained measures. A computerized, adaptive working memory intervention was conducted with 9- to 11-year-old typically developing children. The children considerably improved their performance in the trained working memory task. Additionally, compared to a matched control group, the experimental group significantly enhanced their reading performance after training, providing further evidence for shared processes between working memory and reading.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09297049.2011.575772

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 86 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Brown , L. , Sherbenou , R. J. and Johnsen , S. K. 1997 . TONI-3: Test of Nonverbal Intelligence , 3rd , Austin , TX : Pro-Ed. .
  2. Landerl , K. , Wimmer , H. and Moser , E. 1997 . Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtest (SLRT). Verfahren zur Differentialdiagnose von Störungen des Lesens und Schreibens für die 1. bis 4. Schulstufe , Bern , , Switzerland : Hans Huber .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 365

Metadata

Authors
Loosli, S. V., Buschkuehl, M., Perrig, W. J., & Jaeggi, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Jaeggi, Susanne M.
Venue
Child Neuropsychology
Published
2011-05-26
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
62-78
ISSN
  • 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-4136
OpenAlex
W2128397957
Cited by
365
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 10
FWCI
22.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory training, cognitive training, reading achievement, typically developing children, transfer effects
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Cognition, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Reading, Transfer, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review