Cited by 527Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterialsHeavy Metal Pollution Remediation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Wood-based biochar for the removal of potentially toxic elements in water and wastewater: a critical review

Abstract

Recently, biochar has received significant attention, especially for the removal of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) from water and wastewater. No review has been focused on the potential use of wood-based biochar (WB) for the removal of PTEs in water and wastewater. Here, we have critically reviewed the (i) preparation and characterisation of WB; (ii) removal efficiency of WB for PTEs in water with respect to its physicochemical characteristics, biochar/water ratio, pH, and sorption system; (iii) removal mechanisms of PTEs by WB; (iv) fate of the sorbed PTEs onto WB; and (v) recovery of the sorbed PTEs from the resultant sludge of WB. We also discussed the removal of PTEs by engineered/designer WB as compared to pristine WB. This review demonstrates the overarching scientific opportunities for a comprehensive understanding of using WB as an emerging biosorbent and a promising low-cost and effective material for the remediation of PTEs contaminated water.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09506608.2018.1473096

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 210 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Kunhikrishnan A, 2015, Biochar: production, characterization and applications, 167
  2. Awad YM, 2017, Environ Geochem Health, 39
  3. van der Stelt MJC, 2011, Biomass Bioenergy, 35, 3748
  4. Mireles S, 2016, J Earth Sci Environ Stud, 1
  5. Li J, 2018, Chem Eng J

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shaheen, S. M., Niazi, N. K., Hassan, N. E. E., Bibi, I., Wang, H., Tsang, D. C. W., Ok, Y. S., Bolan, N., & Rinklebe, J.
Affiliations
  • Kafrelsheikh University (EG)
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • Agricultural Research Center (EG)
  • Zhejiang A & F University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Korea University (KR)
  • CRC CARE (AU)
  • University of Wuppertal (DE)
Corresponding author
Rinklebe, Jörg
Venue
International Materials Reviews
Published
2018-07-02
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
216-247
ISSN
  • 0950-6608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-2804
OpenAlex
W2810524590
Cited by
527
References
210
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 7
FWCI
23.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Materials Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • International Foundation for Science
  • Higher Education Commission, Pakistan (6425/Punjab/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2016, 6396/Punjab/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2016)
  • University of Agriculture Faisalabad
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung Humboldt Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Heavy Metal Pollution Remediation
Keywords
wood-based biochar, potentially toxic elements, heavy metal removal, biosorption, wastewater treatment, water remediation, engineered biochar, sorption mechanism, biochar preparation, sludge recovery, low-cost adsorbent

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review