Cited by 47Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin Protection and Aging

Dermocosmetics: beneficial adjuncts in the treatment of acne vulgaris

Open access
Araviiskaia, Elena, Lopez Estebaranz, Jose Luis, Pincelli, Carlo·2021·Journal of Dermatological Treatment

Abstract

Introduction: Dermocosmetics are increasingly being recognized as an integral part of acne management. Dermocosmetics may minimize the side effects of acne medications, provide synergistic effects by improving the efficacy of other treatments, and limit exposure to environmental factors such as ultraviolet radiation. We aimed to provide an overview of the active ingredients and different types of preparations used in dermocosmetics for acne, and highlight supporting evidence for their use in clinical practice.Methods: A literature search for selected key words was performed using PubMed. Additional papers were identified based on author expertize.Results and discussion: The different types of active ingredients in dermocosmetics for acne can be classified as: sebum-controlling, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and/or keratolytic. Such agents may modulate the pathogenic pathways in acne. Dermocosmetics can be formulated as emulsions/creams, cleansers or camouflaging make-up. Dermocosmetics are useful treatment adjuncts for acne and have been shown to improve the clinical signs of acne, reduce transepidermal water loss and modify sebum production. Dermocosmetics have also been associated with reducing side effects of pharmacological treatments, high levels of patient satisfaction and increased adherence to treatment regimens. Together this evidence supports the use of dermocosmetics in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09546634.2019.1628173

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Araviiskaia, E., Lopez Estebaranz, J. L., & Pincelli, C.
Affiliations
  • First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg (RU)
  • Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
Corresponding author
Araviiskaia, Elena
Venue
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Published
2019-07-05
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
3-10
ISSN
  • 0954-6634 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1753
OpenAlex
W2950877526
Cited by
47
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Dermatological Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
cosmeceuticals, acne, active ingredients, antimicrobial agents, anti-inflammatory agents, antioxidants, keratolytic agents, cleansers, sebum production, transepidermal water loss, treatment side effects, medication adherence, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Antioxidants, Cosmetics, Emulsions, Humans, Keratolytic Agents, Sebum, Ultraviolet Rays

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review