Cited by 37Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryCancer survivorship and care

A changed reality: Experience of an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) group after stroke

Open access
Large, Rebecca, Samuel, Victoria, Morris, Reg·2020·Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

Abstract

Copious research on the utility of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in long-term conditions has demonstrated promising results. However, little research has been conducted on ACT within stroke, particularly studies that are qualitative in nature. The aim of this paper was to gain insight into stroke survivors' experiences of ACT and to explore what processes help facilitate adjustment in living with residual disability. Interviews with thirteen stroke survivors following their attendance at a stroke-adapted ACT group were analysed using a grounded theory approach. Stroke survivors varied in age, severity of stroke, limitations and duration since stroke. Interviews revealed a main difficulty of "accepting a changed reality" following stroke. Survivors' narratives regarding their experiences of ACT revealed insight into which processes helped facilitate movement towards accepting symptoms and a changed reality and into helpful and less helpful aspects of the intervention. Stroke survivors find ACT helpful in adjusting to stroke limitations. ACT appears to have potential as a psychological intervention for stroke survivors experiencing psychological distress. Amendments to the format of the intervention to enhance the impact of ACT impact are identified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09602011.2019.1589531

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Large, R., Samuel, V., & Morris, R.
Affiliations
Cardiff University (GB)
Corresponding author
Morris, Reg
Venue
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Published
2019-03-29
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
1477-1496
ISSN
  • 0960-2011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0694
OpenAlex
W2925342522
Cited by
37
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, stroke survivors, stroke rehabilitation, psychological adjustment, psychological distress, group therapy, residual disability, lived experience
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Psychological Distress, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotherapy, Group, Patient Satisfaction, Process Assessment, Health Care, Survivors, Stroke, Qualitative Research, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review