Cited by 547Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsSocial and Intergroup PsychologyOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Biases in social comparative judgments: The role of nonmotivated factors in above-average and comparative-optimism effects

Chambers, John R., Windschitl, Paul D.·2004·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Biases in social comparative judgments, such as those illustrated by above-average and comparative-optimism effects, are often regarded as products of motivated reasoning (e.g., self-enhancement). These effects, however, can also be produced by information-processing limitations or aspects of judgment processes that are not necessarily biased by motivational factors. In this article, the authors briefly review motivational accounts of biased comparative judgments, introduce a 3-stage model for understanding how people make comparative judgments, and then describe how various nonmotivational factors can influence the 3 stages of the comparative judgment process. Finally, the authors discuss several unresolved issues highlighted by their analysis, such as the interrelation between motivated and nonmotivated sources of bias and the influence of nonmotivated sources of bias on behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.813

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Healthy adults maintain inherently positive or inflated self-views and report having more positive and less negative attributes than others (above average effect).

    “These findings align with previous work positing that healthy adults maintain inherently positive or inflated self-views (4, 32) and report having more positive and less negative attributes than others, known as the “above average effect” (6, 33).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambers, J. R., & Windschitl, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2004
Volume
130
Issue
5
Pages
813-838
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2033377303
Cited by
547
References
162
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 27
FWCI
14.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
above-average effect, motivated reasoning, self-enhancement, information processing limitations, judgment bias
MeSH terms
Affect, Humans, Judgment, Motivation, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review