Cited by 126Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationThermoregulation and physiological responsesUrban Heat Island Mitigation

Thermal pleasure in built environments: alliesthesia in different thermoregulatory zones

Parkinson, Thomas, de Dear, Richard, Candido, Christhina·2016·Building Research & Information

Abstract

The principle of thermal alliesthesia indicates that the hedonic character of a thermal environment is determined as much by the general state of the subject as by the environment itself. An environmental stimulus that offsets or counters a thermoregulatory load error will be pleasantly perceived, and vice versa. Extant empirical evidence supporting thermal alliesthesia only exists for instances of core temperature deviation. Yet the reconciliation of alliesthesia with contemporary neurophysiological discourse (in the previous paper in this series) renders the concept directly relevant to everyday experiences in built environments where core temperature rarely deviates from neutral values. New experimental data are presented that explore alliesthesia in non-steady-state conditions across three different physiological states: thermoneutral; the upper and lower fringes of the thermoneutral zone; and mild excursions into the sweating and shivering regulatory zones. Thirteen human subjects evaluated the hedonic tone of a sequence of temperature step-changes and ramps. It was found that the psychophysiological principle of thermal alliesthesia operates within the thermoneutral zone, making it equally relevant to quotidian indoor environments as it is to the extremes found in traditional physiological research. Non-steady-state built environments can potentially offer spatial alliesthesia through carefully managed contrasts between local and mean skin temperature trends. Transitional zones are suggested as design solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09613218.2015.1059653

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is possible to evoke alliesthesia within the TNZ, which is most representative for the physiological state of building occupants in most indoor environments.

    “Parkinson et al. [118] concluded that it is even possible to evoke alliesthesia within the TNZ, which is most representative for the physiological state of building occupants in most indoor environments.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parkinson, T., de Dear, R., & Candido, C.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Parkinson, Thomas
Venue
Building Research & Information
Published
2015-07-10
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
20-33
ISSN
  • 0961-3218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-4321
OpenAlex
W1412627499
Cited by
126
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Building Research & Information (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Keywords
thermal comfort, thermoneutral zone, thermoregulation, skin temperature, sweating, shivering, indoor thermal environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review